Except....he's not asking to sub his own new rules.....he's saying Schiff shouldn't be doing that....
Again, reading comprehension, think you need to brush up on it.
NO - you have repeated a Barr edit of a partial statement from Mueller that Barr cherry picked and shortened.
Of course Schiff should be doing just that as it is carrying out his constitutional responsibilities.
And again- you have to resort to personal insults.
Independent clause haymarket, look it up.
Is it an insult if it's true?
So you think it's Schiff's job to substitute his judgement for the electorate's?
Well there ya go folks......
Of course it is Schiff's job to perform his constitutional duties. Why would you even ask that? And using his own judgment is always part of that equation regardless of the party and situation. Judgment comes with every situation.... at least it better.
Yea, just like every other thread, deflect, dodge, avoid, twist.....
You are a completely dishonest poster.
If I was any more direct in answering you, the similarity between you and roadkill would not be accidental..
Yep, that's you, the poster child for direct,
"What do YOU THINK is preceding the sentence that you said is edited"
Your reply "I will read the report"
Yep, extremely direct.
I have already provided an extremely direct answer to this question.
You may not like the answer - but the question was directly answered.
LOL keep telling yourself that,
Direct and delusional, you are nailing it.
Really? So everything you said in support of Trump was sarcasm and you really did not mean it?
Adam Schiff went through an entire litany of Trump behavior that was not okay by his standards and by American standards and principles and not one person was able to correct him.
You demonstrate once again your inabilities.
You're really a very funny person.
If you actually are a person and not a Russian bot in a Macedonian sweat shop.
Schiff lies every time he makes a statement.
He is never honest in anything he says about anything at any time the complete sense. Never.
the answer was given and it was a direct one.
Your approval is NOT necessary.
Like I said, you are delusional, and on one one said my approval is necessary,
But I don't think direct means what you want it to mean,
"What do you think would change the meaning of that sentence"
"I have to read the report"
Yep, that's direct, it's ok, everyone can see you are afraid to give an opinion.
asked and answered.
repeatedly.
The possibility exists of a report issued in edited and abridged from where we do not see the reactions or see that they have been made simply because that material is missing.
And the Congress is a co-equal branch of government and has a right top see the full report.
Yea,but the same evasive, non direct, answer you always give.....it comes down to you can't give an opinion, because you haven't been told what to think... "I have to read the report first, there is absolutely no way I can form my own opinion, when the report hasn't been released, and the leadership of the left haven't given their talking points"
Yea,but the same evasive, non direct, answer you always give.....it comes down to you can't give an opinion, because you haven't been told what to think... "I have to read the report first, there is absolutely no way I can form my own opinion, when the report hasn't been released, and the leadership of the left haven't given their talking points"
When Deven Nunes, senior official of the House Intelligence Committee, requested documents from the swamp FBI and DOJ, he was slow walked by the Democrats. It took over a year to get many of the documents. Maybe we need to use that standard on the Democrats and swamp.
Barr and Republicans are much more cooperative than were the Democrats. The main difference in behavior was the Democrats had stuff to hide, while the Republican are innocent so they can be more cooperative and transparent. The documents that Nunes finally obtained are not good for the Democrats and are about to lead to indictments. This is why these documents were slow walked for so long. If Barr delivers in 2 weeks, the Democrats will have a second rug pulled from under them. Fast means innocent and slow means guilty.
asked - answered - repeatedly.
The answer is I do not know what is the the first part of that missing sentence.
And neither does anyone else.
asked & answered repeatedly.LOL We get it, you don't know how to think on your own because you don't know the talking points yet....no worries.