• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him?”

phoenix2020 said:
Cool story or whatever but what we all need from you right now is for you to unlock that safe where you keep your incontrovertible proof of massive 2020 electoral fraud that Donald asked you to hang on to. He (and we) are getting rather tired of your failure to produce even a single shred of it.
Click to expand...
They're not done killing that dead horse yet, they must think it's Mr. Ed and if they keep beating the corpse it will talk?
 
Craig234 said:
Wait, the Russian effort did not manipulate any votes? What a bizarre and false statement. So, the flooded social media with targeted propaganda, and claim it did not affect one vote? The evidence says otherwise.
Click to expand...

I took that to mean that the Russians did not manage to directly manipulate votes via voting machine interference. Direct manipulation as opposed to influence.
 
vanceen said:
I took that to mean that the Russians did not manage to directly manipulate votes via voting machine interference. Direct manipulation as opposed to influence.
Click to expand...
I have to agree, I suspected that might be the case, but they said it wrong.
 
lynnwinslow said:
Grandpa talking out of his ass again.
(Also, didn't the Supreme Court just give presidents broad immunity?)

Click to expand...

For acts related to his job. Interfering in an election probably isn't his job.
 
Craig234 said:
Wait, the Russian effort did not manipulate any votes? What a bizarre and false statement. So, the flooded social media with targeted propaganda, and claim it did not affect one vote? The evidence says otherwise.
Click to expand...
It does. But with no way to prove it either way, the general belief is that no votes were tampered with. We know that millions were influenced.
 
The AntiDonald said:
It does. But with no way to prove it either way, the general belief is that no votes were tampered with. We know that millions were influenced.
Click to expand...
I've often said that the beauty of it is that the influence is hard to measure. I highly doubt someone being polled is going to admit that they changed their vote from Hillary to Trump because of the Russian lies they saw on Facebook.
 
Lord Cheeto needs this manufactured diversion from the Epstein quagmire, and plenty of MAGAs are falling for it care of rags like ZeroHedge.
 
The AntiDonald said:
It does. But with no way to prove it either way, the general belief is that no votes were tampered with. We know that millions were influenced.
Click to expand...
Ya, I agree with what they seemed to be trying to say, but think they used the wrong language. They referred to 'manipulating' votes seeming to mean only corrupting the votes cast in the system, but that's not what the word actually means.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom