Bannon Is Subpoenaed in Mueller’s Russia Investigation

[MateoMtnClimber]

Thank you very much for proving my point about the liberal arrogance and know it all attitude. One of these days you will outgrow it and hope I am here to see it. Help yourself because you are the one that truly needs it

Liberal arrogance. Mmhmm. The spite reflected in your posts indicates your insecurity. I would feel badly for you if I liked you. Now, let's see what Bannon tells Mueller and then resume this pointless conversation.

 

[haymarket]

That is the point, NO CAST VOTES were changed so what is the big issue here about Russian hacking of the DNC Computers? Trump won the election and here we are over a year later and you still cannot accept the fact that the Obama record, legacy, and Hillary Clinton lost

Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

 

[haymarket]

Oh brother...:roll: If you think that what Russia attempted in the '16 election is any different than what they have been doing since the cold war, then you are fooling yourself....BTW, we do the same damned crap to them that they do to us....You guys are throwing the most epic tantrum since little Jimmy didn't get the toy he wanted at the WalMart toy isle....Also, I am sure you condemn Obama for meddling in Israel's election too don't you? No, I didn't think so.

Okay - I will indulge you - p[lease present that evidence that what the Russians did in the 2016 election was also done in the many previous elections since the cold war started in the late 40's.

I will await your evidence.

 

[Conservative]

Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

So you are telling me that the Russian hacking didn't affect the election, thank you, we totally agree as does the head of DHS under Obama, so why the witch hunt?

 

[haymarket]

So you are telling me that the Russian hacking didn't affect the election, thank you, we totally agree as does the head of DHS under Obama, so why the witch hunt?

You failed to answer the direct question put to you.


I ask you again.... Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

How do you know the Russian actions did not effect the election?

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

I can't wait to see the answer to this.

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

So you are telling me that the Russian hacking didn't affect the election, thank you, we totally agree as does the head of DHS under Obama, so why the witch hunt?

The witch hunt is a special investigation directed by the attorney general's designee. The attorney general was nominated by the president. Lord gawd jeezus, I hope you are still a member of this forum when it all ends. I'm practicing what I will say to you.

 

[haymarket]

I can't wait to see the answer to this.

I am afraid we will all have to wait until the proverbial Hell freezes over.

 

[Conservative]

You failed to answer the direct question put to you.


I ask you again.... Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

How do you know the Russian actions did not effect the election?

I don't have a fricken clue what you are talking about, been drinking today and tonight? What the hell is this Russian hacking deal all about then? The issue is that Russians influenced the election for Trump which means propaganda trumps illegal votes and illegal activity. I don't know nor do I care and you certainly cannot prove it either what the Russians did because we are a country of free will and since no votes were changed at the voting booth your problem is you lost the election and cannot get over it.

 

[haymarket]

I don't have a fricken clue what you are talking about,

It is fairly simple... You failed to answer the direct question put to you.


I ask you again.... Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

How do you know the Russian actions did not effect the election?

 

[Conservative]

It is fairly simple... You failed to answer the direct question put to you.


I ask you again.... Whose argument are you taking issue with? Who is it - ANYWHERE - who claims the issue with Russian interference is that Clinton votes were changed to Trump votes?

How do you know the Russian actions did not effect the election?

As I recall that is what you and the left are claiming as Hillary was winning but Russia changed people's minds and votes to Trump

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

 

[haymarket]

As I recall that is what you and the left are claiming as Hillary was winning but Russia changed people's minds and votes to Trump

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
That is the point, NO CAST VOTES were changed so what is the big issue here about Russian hacking of the DNC Computers?

I do not know of a single person who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of people who made this argument - produce it.

I do not know of a single person associated with the Clinton campaign who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of people who made this argument - produce it.

I do not know of a single member of the US House of Representatives who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of Representatives who made this argument - produce their claim.

I do not know of a single US Senator who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of Senators who made this argument - produce their claim.

I do not know of a single member of the US Intelligence community who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of any who made this argument - produce it.

Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
Thread after thread about Russian involvement in our election, yet no votes changed, that is bottom line that you and everyone else is ignoring while you are also ignoring the real problem voter fraud.

You keep repeating the same statement over and over and over and have done so for months and months now but who are you arguing with? Nobody has claimed what you keep arguing with. Nobody.

 

[Conservative]

I do not know of a single person who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of people who made this argument - produce it.

I do not know of a single person associated with the Clinton campaign who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of people who made this argument - produce it.

I do not know of a single member of the US House of Representatives who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of Representatives who made this argument - produce their claim.

I do not know of a single US Senator who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of Senators who made this argument - produce their claim.

I do not know of a single member of the US Intelligence community who has ever claimed that ballots cast for Clinton were changed by the Russians into votes for Trump. If you claim you know of any who made this argument - produce it.



You keep repeating the same statement over and over and over and have done so for months and months now but who are you arguing with? Nobody has claimed what you keep arguing with. Nobody.

You are right, you do not know very much. The claim was that Russian hacked the US election and that Hillary had the votes to win but their hacking caused people to change their minds BEFORE entering the voting booth. That is reality and now you want to word smith everything to try and save face, too late, you can never save faith as a radical leftists out of touch with reality

 

[haymarket]

You are right, you do not know very much. The claim was that Russian hacked the US election and that Hillary had the votes to win but their hacking caused people to change their minds BEFORE entering the voting booth. That is reality and now you want to word smith everything to try and save face, too late, you can never save faith as a radical leftists out of touch with reality

Your claim was

Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
That is the point, NO CAST VOTES were changed so what is the big issue here about Russian hacking of the DNC Computers?

 

[Conservative]

Your claim was

You don't seem to understand basic English as that statement is accurate, what was changed according to you and the radical left were the uncast votes as Hillary had the election in the bag according to liberals until Russia changed all those minds. All Polls had Hillary winning the election and of course her record and illegal activities played certainly no role in her loss but rather it was the Russian hacking of the DNC computers and releasing accurate information about the Clinton campaign. What an embarrassment for the Democratic Party.

 

[haymarket]

You don't seem to understand basic English as that statement is accurate, what was changed according to you and the radical left were the uncast votes as Hillary had the election in the bag according to liberals until Russia changed all those minds. All Polls had Hillary winning the election and of course her record and illegal activities played certainly no role in her loss but rather it was the Russian hacking of the DNC computers and releasing accurate information about the Clinton campaign. What an embarrassment for the Democratic Party.

here was YOUR claim of alleged fact

Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
That is the point, NO CAST VOTES were changed so what is the big issue here about Russian hacking of the DNC Computers?

You have been posting this sort of claim for nearly a year now. You have made it crystal clear that since nobody has shown that any cast ballots were changed from Clinton to Trump, that this should not be an issue. The only problem with that is nobody ever made such a claim about switched ballots in the first place. It is nonsense that you made up and you continue to push and is a fantasy borne from your own extremism and desire to excuse anything Trump does.

 

[Conservative]

here was YOUR claim of alleged fact



You have been posting this sort of claim for nearly a year now. You have made it crystal clear that since nobody has shown that any cast ballots were changed from Clinton to Trump, that this should not be an issue. The only problem with that is nobody ever made such a claim about switched ballots in the first place. It is nonsense that you made up and you continue to push and is a fantasy borne from your own extremism and desire to excuse anything Trump does.

Do you know the difference between an UNCAST VOTE AND A CAST VOTE?? Which one elects the President and Congressional leaders? For some reason this is something you do not seem to understand. And yes it is my issue that Russian influence that didn't change a CAST BALLOT shouldn't take over a year to investigate so why don't you tell me exactly what the issue is with regard to the Russian investigation?

 

[haymarket]

Do you know the difference between an UNCAST VOTE AND A CAST VOTE?? Which one elects the President and Congressional leaders? For some reason this is something you do not seem to understand. And yes it is my issue that Russian influence that didn't change a CAST BALLOT shouldn't take over a year to investigate so why don't you tell me exactly what the issue is with regard to the Russian investigation?

So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

 

[Conservative]

So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

Russia has done nothing that the US doesn't do all over the world but apparently propaganda is only bad when it hurts a radical and the American people are too stupid according to liberals to know a lie from the truth. You lost the election, get over it. The head of Obama's DHS said that Russian didn't cost Hillary the election but that isn't good enough for radicals who now want to still overturn the election results. Quite frankly I don't give a damn about what the Russians did but rather how stupid the Democrats were in putting such damaging information on their computer. It really pisses you off that the corrupt Democratic Party was uncovered and that is the real issue.

 

[haymarket]

Russia has done nothing that the US doesn't do all over the world but apparently propaganda is only bad when it hurts a radical and the American people are too stupid according to liberals to know a lie from the truth. You lost the election, get over it. The head of Obama's DHS said that Russian didn't cost Hillary the election but that isn't good enough for radicals who now want to still overturn the election results. Quite frankly I don't give a damn about what the Russians did but rather how stupid the Democrats were in putting such damaging information on their computer. It really pisses you off that the corrupt Democratic Party was uncovered and that is the real issue.

I ask you again: So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

 

[Conservative]

I ask you again: So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

Investigating ongoing for well over a year on an issue that had no bearing on the election results is a waste of time, effort, and money. Hacking of private computers is a violation of the law that should be prosecuted but it isn't a national issue at all as the election result were not compromised. Nothing but red meat to radicals who will never accept defeat. I would have thought a former civics teacher would understand this issue.

 

[haymarket]

Investigating ongoing for well over a year on an issue that had no bearing on the election results is a waste of time, effort, and money. Hacking of private computers is a violation of the law that should be prosecuted but it isn't a national issue at all as the election result were not compromised. Nothing but red meat to radicals who will never accept defeat. I would have thought a former civics teacher would understand this issue.

Would that be a YES or a NO to my question? So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

 

[Conservative]

I ask you again: So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

Look, I get it, you don't like losing but you lost, get over it. There are a lot more pressing issues than Russia hacking a DNC computer but apparently illegals, the dead, and people voting multiple times don't meet your standards and are trumped by simple propaganda that turned out to be true. By all means focus on Russian hacking that didn't affect the election and ignore voter ID laws and requirements to prevent actual illegal votes from being cast. No wonder you have zero credibility and continue to lose elections. Here are the results you want to ignore

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Original Data Value

Series Id: LNS12000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Years: 2007 to 2017

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 146028 146057 146320 145586 145903 146063 145905 145682 146244 145946 146595 146273

2016 150576 151005 151229 150978 151048 151164 151484 151687 151815 151939 152126 152233
2017 152076 152511 153064 153161 152892 153250 153511 153471 154324 153846 153917 154021

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Original Data Value

Series Id: LNS12032194
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Hours at work: 1 to 34 hours
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time
Years: 2007 to 2017
2007 4279 4220 4253 4313 4473 4342 4410 4576 4521 4325 4494 4618

2016 5960 6021 6099 6027 6491 5751 5898 5977 5893 5955 5719 5554
2017 5776 5670 5500 5309 5268 5264 5236 5209 5148 4880 4851 4915

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Original Data Value

Series Id: LNS13000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Unemployment Level
Labor force status: Unemployed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Years: 2007 to 2017


2007 7116 6927 6731 6850 6766 6979 7149 7067 7170 7237 7240 7645

2016 7811 7806 8024 7942 7465 7812 7723 7827 7919 7761 7419 7502
2017 7642 7486 7171 7021 6837 6964 6956 7127 6759 6524 6616 6576

 

[Conservative]

Would that be a YES or a NO to my question? So you are under the personal belief that since no ballots were actually changed after the voter cast their vote - then we should not be investigating Russian interference in the election and who on the USA end enabled or aided in this effort?

The hacking of a private computer is a personal issue not a federal one, get over it, you lost. You have yet to prove that Russians interfered with the election process after a year of investigation, when is enough enough.

 

[Praxas]

Investigating ongoing for well over a year on an issue that had no bearing on the election results is a waste of time, effort, and money. Hacking of private computers is a violation of the law that should be prosecuted but it isn't a national issue at all as the election result were not compromised. Nothing but red meat to radicals who will never accept defeat. I would have thought a former civics teacher would understand this issue.

Funny you guys weren't whining about the 2 YEARS you all spent investigating Hillary. Maybe you should take a civics class and realize that investigations don't end just because your partisan hackery want them to. And yes, it did have an impact on the election.