- Joined
- Nov 27, 2016
- Messages
- 30,840
- Reaction score
- 6,485
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid, and no investigation was required in order for it to happen
That's continues to be the best defense.
Anything else obscures this fact and leaves Trump open to claims such as being reported that Bolton is claiming.
It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid, and no investigation was required in order for it to happen
That's continues to be the best defense.
Anything else obscures this fact and leaves Trump open to claims such as being reported that Bolton is claiming.
It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid, and no investigation was required in order for it to happen
That's continues to be the best defense.
Richard Reid, the Shoe Bomber, could claim the same defense - he never blew up the airplane, so he should go free.
was tha aid late, on time, or early?
It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid, and no investigation was required in order for it to happen
That's continues to be the best defense.
Anything else obscures this fact and leaves Trump open to claims such as being reported that Bolton is claiming.
It continues to be the case that it is illegal to want to blow up a plane.
Its not illegal to withhold aid.
It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid
was tha aid late, on time, or early?
...after trump was caught.
Your thread is aptly titled.
It continues to be the case that it is illegal to want to blow up a plane.
Its not illegal to withhold aid.
It's illegal to withhold approved aid for personal benefit. The GAO said so.
It continues to be the case that it is illegal to want to blow up a plane.
Its not illegal to withhold aid.
except there is absolutely no proof he did so for personal reasons , if at all.
The whistle-blower coming forward was required for the aid to be released.It continues to be a fact that Ukraine received its aid, and no investigation was required in order for it to happen
That's continues to be the best defense.
Anything else obscures this fact and leaves Trump open to claims such as being reported that Bolton is claiming.
Do you know when the aid was released?
I believe it was the day after the whistle blower complaint became public knowledge. So the idea that no investigation was needed is kind of absurd on it's face. Trump abused his power in an attempt to bribe a foreign nation with American taxpayer dollars for his own benefit. He stopped when he got caught.
Hmm... in other words, oversight worked?
Hmm... in other words, oversight worked?
except there is absolutely no proof he did so for personal reasons , if at all.
It sure as hell was; GAO: Trump’s hold on Ukraine aid violated budget law
Not really. Sure, Trump panicked when the scandal first broke, and in fact all Republicans were panicking for a good month before they settled on attacking the impeachment process as a defense in addition to outright gaslighting. But if the White House can block subpoenas with impunity then, ultimately, oversight isn't really a thing.
It's illegal to withhold approved aid for personal benefit. The GAO said so.
The OMB disagrees with the GAO's opinion on the release of aid.
Not really. Sure, Trump panicked when the scandal first broke, and in fact all Republicans were panicking for a good month before they settled on attacking the impeachment process as a defense in addition to outright gaslighting. But if the White House can block subpoenas with impunity then, ultimately, oversight isn't really a thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?