• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BaaWhaaa- DOJ Urges Court To Partially Halt Order For Trump Special Master

Do you think it's unfair to question why she was not charged the same as people are suggesting Trump be charged?
I think Donald was asked for these documents. Then, I think Donald ignored their request. I think Donald truly believes he's above the law. I guess we're gunna see if he is or not.
 
Based on the caveat that the records are marked correctly I do agree with that as a stand alone statement. I dont think anyone is contesting that.
So you agree that Presidential records and documents marked as classified are property of the US government and should not be stored at a private residence.

Then, you toss off a remark that no one is contesting that. How do you explain everyone in DP who is complaining about the FBI search to retrieve Presidential records and classified documents from Trump's private residence? Are you saying that their complaints are not contesting the DOJ and FBI's actions? That makes no sense.
 
You are wrong once again.

The special master has absolutely no control and won't be ruling on the admissibility of the evidence. That is the judge's ultimate determination.

The special master has been appointed in part to address Trump's claim that even though the FBI has already reviewed everything, he doesn't trust them cuz' they are vicious, evil and out to get him. So he wants a separate set of eyes to first review the docs to make sure the FBI doesn't see anything privileged, despite the fact they have already seen everything.

Second, the special master was appointed in part to identify/segregate documents that may be subject to Trump's claim of executive privilege, despite the fact no court anywhere has ever ruled that such a privilege exists for a former president as against the executive branch that the documents came from. She just wants to be sure to protect Trumps feelings, cuz his reputation is on the line and he could possibly, maybe prevail on the executive privilege issue.

Perhaps, maybe he had a run in with the FBI & DOJ with bogus FISA warrants and pee tapes. And an FBI lawyer faking evidence.
 
Perhaps, maybe he had a run in with the FBI & DOJ with bogus FISA warrants and pee tapes. And an FBI lawyer faking evidence.
Or perhaps he is a well known pathogical liar who has no defense of his criminal acts.
 
Have you ever held a security clearance? Even just Public Trust? I'm sure you haven't, because otherwise you would've had to pass a quiz proving that you understand how adversaries piece together a puzzle using various tidbits of seemingly mundane information. Information is classified because it could cause damage to national security, either alone or together with other information. That's what Obama was talking about and what you don't understand.
I hope to god none of these idiots ever held a clearance.
 
Perhaps, maybe he had a run in with the FBI & DOJ with bogus FISA warrants and pee tapes. And an FBI lawyer faking evidence.
Then again, maybe he didn't but wants to whine about it like he whines about everything.
More importantly, it misses the point: seeking a special master two weeks after the FBI has been reviewing ALL documents is a little late in the game if the intent is to keep the corrupt, evil FBI from reviewing documents that may contain attorney client privileged matters.

Why idiot Trump would have those mixed in with classified materials is anyone's guess. Want to take a stab at that one? And why he didn't spot those privileged materials during the "diligent search" of all boxes that he certified had been done?
 
Why was it a whoops? I want more information from them not less. They still have a lot of question they need to answer.
It's simply remarkable that you guys continue with this angle without ever once seeking answers to the really important questions that only Trump can answer. Why no interest in those questions and answers?
 
The judge is under the impression that there is a separation of powers issue between the DOJ and the former president.

She is under the impression that a private citizen has executive privilege.

She seems not aware of the Supreme Court decision that executive privilege does not hold in a criminal investigation.
In other words, she's unbelievably unqualified. Just like so many Federalists Society judges that Mitch rammed through at the last minute.
 
Perhaps, maybe he had a run in with the FBI & DOJ with bogus FISA warrants and pee tapes. And an FBI lawyer faking evidence.
Doesn't make what he did legal. He had 4 years to deal with all that and couldn't make it happen. Two wrongs never make a right.
 
Seems? How do you come to this conclusion before the DOJ has presented their case?

Presented their case? They only need to show probable cause. That has been well established.
 
Perhaps, maybe he had a run in with the FBI & DOJ with bogus FISA warrants and pee tapes. And an FBI lawyer faking evidence.

Oh yes, Donny is the victim. My lord just stop.
 
Why was it a whoops? I want more information from them not less. They still have a lot of question they need to answer.
You ask for material that is already staring you in the face. Then you ask for more and when you get that You finally start asking for people to prove a negative or you will not be satisfied. This is such an old warn out path.....You need a new playbook.

I don't suppose you have noticed that Trump and Trumpoid court actions are dropping like flies. Not that this is a surprise or something new. Do you actually think this one is going to be any different? Based on what.....law of averages?

But you will continue to blather away as if you and your boys actually have an argument to make.
 
Well there you go...that makes it all better!
Makes what all better? All im doing is reminding people of the standard that the left informed the rest of is. Garland claims he represents transparency and equal application of our laws. How can you justify giving Hillary a pass (which I agreed with back then) but not Trump today?
 
Makes what all better? All im doing is reminding people of the standard that the left informed the rest of is. Garland claims he represents transparency and equal application of our laws. How can you justify giving Hillary a pass (which I agreed with back then) but not Trump today?
Why didn't Bill Barr Indict Hillary? Why don't you start by asking yourself that question. Go find the answer and get back to us with you do. Until then, you are blowing smoke.
 
I think Donald was asked for these documents. Then, I think Donald ignored their request. I think Donald truly believes he's above the law. I guess we're gunna see if he is or not.
She destroyed documents after the FBI sent her a subpoena for them.
 
She destroyed documents after the FBI sent her a subpoena for them.
Well then if she actually did that I would guess Bill Barr should have charged her when he had the chance. Until you can explain why Barr didn't charge her you are just blowing smoke.
 
So you agree that Presidential records and documents marked as classified are property of the US government and should not be stored at a private residence.

Then, you toss off a remark that no one is contesting that. How do you explain everyone in DP who is complaining about the FBI search to retrieve Presidential records and classified documents from Trump's private residence? Are you saying that their complaints are not contesting the DOJ and FBI's actions? That makes no sense.
Because you are conflation multiple positions together as if they are all the same.

1. All governments documents are the property of the gov.

2. People are allowed to also possess documents that belong to the gov. A very simple example of that is your birth certificate. That is a gov document that most of us have in our filing cabinet at our house.

3. Does NARA have the authority to force the former president to turn over specific documents in his possession is a legal questions that should be decided in court by a judge
 
Does NARA have the authority to force the former president to turn over specific documents in his possession is a legal questions that should be decided in court by a judge
This right here is why your posts are garbage. I have seen the Presidential Records Act posted directly to you in response to this dishonest question more than once. Clearly that was you wasting people's time. Stop sucking all the oxygen out of every thread with your childish horse****.
 
Because you are conflation multiple positions together as if they are all the same.

1. All governments documents are the property of the gov.

2. People are allowed to also possess documents that belong to the gov. A very simple example of that is your birth certificate. That is a gov document that most of us have in our filing cabinet at our house.

3. Does NARA have the authority to force the former president to turn over specific documents in his possession is a legal questions that should be decided in court by a judge
I'm not talking about ALL government documents. I am specifically talking about presidential records and classified documents. You know that.
 
Well then if she actually did that I would guess Bill Barr should have charged her when he had the chance. Until you can explain why Barr didn't charge her you are just blowing smoke.
Lynch was the AG but that is beside the point. Is it your position that she should of been charged but was not? That wasn't the lefts position at the time.
 
Because you are conflation multiple positions together as if they are all the same.

1. All governments documents are the property of the gov.

2. People are allowed to also possess documents that belong to the gov. A very simple example of that is your birth certificate. That is a gov document that most of us have in our filing cabinet at our house.

3. Does NARA have the authority to force the former president to turn over specific documents in his possession is a legal questions that should be decided in court by a judge
yes but DoJ leapfrogged right over that with the Espionge act smoke screen
 
Back
Top Bottom