There is ideology and then their is reality. Nothing truly works in the human world as it should.
No, objective rules are static - does 2 + 2 sometimes add up to 3 or 5? An econometric function that takes observation of subjective human action as an input can still produce objective results.
That is the essence of living in an irrational world made up of subjective beings.
Like I said: personal values can be subjective, but social rulesets MUST be objective. Any subjective activity valued by the subject that bares its economic costs, and that doesn't violate the objectively-recognized rights of others, has an objective value.
Take baseball for example. There's nothing objective about grown men throwing a little ball around for hours, and yet millions of people voluntarily choose to pay their hard-earned dollars to watch them do it, buy team baseball caps, and so on. Outlaw baseball, and there will be economic decline, in part because people would be more depressed and less willing to earn more money to pay for their subjective hobby - thus it has an objective value to the human economy.
Hence, in the real world, capitalism distributes resources in a hierarchical manner. You may not like it, but that is how it is.
Capitalism allocates economic results based on economic contribution, which can vary drastically from an illiterate peasant following his boss's instructions in a "sweatshop" to a Bill Gates thinking up new ways to propel the human civilization forward, but it does not create a hierarchy.
That illiterate peasant owns his body, his mind, his speech, his time, any skills that he may have, his reputation in the minds of others, and so on - that is his capital, even if he hasn't got a single penny to his name. No one can take those things away from him without his consent. He might find that reality dictates for him to use his body and time to earn a living so that he can feed himself, but that is his choice to make. Maybe this peasant loves his childhood memories and his wife so much that he wouldn't trade places with Bill Gates even if he could!
Objectivity only exists to the extent that humans can perceive it. As we live in our minds, not as automatons within the physical world, there are around 6 billion points of view.
Yes, which is why democracy and other collectivist systems don't work very well. Each individual adult is the best judge of what is best for him, individually, as long as he doesn't violate the natural rights of others.
Also, please provide empirical evidence of natural rights. :mrgreen:
Sure. If you violate my natural rights, you will get shot. Any questions? :mrgreen:
Or you can spend several years studying history and economics, and you will discover that the society that violates those natural rights the least has a competitive advantage over the societies that violate them more.