- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
No I do not.
A better question, do you actually owe taxes and the IRS knows?
Yes that is a much more interesting and relevant question than your first one.
Even though it's none of your business?
Yes that is a much more interesting and relevant question than your first one.
This is a lie as there is no scientific consensus that a fertilized egg is a person. A fertilized egg can grow into a person, but a fertilized egg has no organs no brain, no capacity to feel or think, etc. At that point it is just two cells.
I don't know what scientists you are talking about, but without consensus they are meaningless, and there is no consensus.
Then your statement was pointless.
It's not much of a claim if you say you withhold taxes if you don't actually owe them to begin with.
your werent surprised by this outcome were you?
I don't owe taxes on purpose. Per diem and expense reports are awesome.Then your statement was pointless.
I don't owe taxes on purpose. Per diem and expense reports are awesome.
Were you forced to take money out of your pocket and directly pay for ammunition?
Yes through taxes.
Oh ok, I think I understand you now. You're talking about fraud, right?
Good for them, people need to be more responsible when having sex. Either you: Have safe sex or only have sex when you want a child. Hobby Lobby shouldn't have to pay for these peoples so-called "mistakes" or "accidents".
Yeah, but for the Libbos, personal responsibility is a thing of the past.
Sine when is receiving per diem and deducting expenses fraud? Oh, wait, it's not. But, I don't expect you know that. You probably think a "loophole" and a "deduction" are the same thing.
Apples and oranges.
Yeah, but for the Libbos, personal responsibility is a thing of the past.
nope they arent being told to go against their beliefs, they are free to practice their beliefs for themselves all they want.
Theres no violation of their religion at all because their religious freedom does NOT allow them to impose their religions on others outside of the religious realm. They have ZERO authority outside the religious realm in THIS case. No violation at all. The violation is them trying to impose thier religion on others because they ADMITTED making a choice solely based on their religion.
Just like St Lukes hospital couldn't deny visitation rights to husband/wife that were not married per the religion of the hospital. If the owner, ceo, administration of the hospital doesnt believe the couple is married in their religious views they have zero rights to stop the wife/husband from visitation, why? because a hospital has nothing to do with religion and has to play by the same rules as everyone else.
1.)You are using so many analogies to debate the issue at hand that you end up debating the analogoies.
2.)You should stick to the issue at hand, which is that a company is being forced by the government to buy something for a third party which goes against their religious beliefs.
Leftists are terrible at analogies anyway and only leads to their further confusion.
One only needs to look at the right to see the hypocrisy. They whine about personal responsibility, but have no problem taking federal money (FEMA) when disaster hits their states.
Personal responsibility would dictate you don't live in hurricane prone areas OR you pay for it yourself through insurance and plan ahead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?