Attorney: New audio reveals pause in gunfire when Michael Brown was shot
By Holly Yan, CNNLawyer: Audio shows 11 shots when Michael Brown killed - CNN.com
updated 12:36 AM EDT, Tue August 26, 2014
[...]
In the recording, a quick series of shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then another quick succession of shots.
"I personally heard at least 11" shots, the man's attorney, Lopa Blumenthal, told CNN's Don Lemon.
The man, who asked that his identity not be revealed, lives near the site of the shooting and was close enough to have heard the gunshots, Blumenthal said.
He was speaking to a friend on a video chat service and happened to be recording the conversation at the same time Brown was shot, Blumenthal said.
[...]
11 Shots in 5 seconds.
Short pause between 6 and the other five.Just more evidence.Likely Brown was still coming at him.
iLOLOr just as likely that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of multiple bullet wounds, eh?
How can anyone really know if they weren't an eyewitness?
Eleven shots eh?iLOL
You already know the evidence. So why are you speaking nonsense?
Or are you suggesting that the scheme teams non-official autopsy was wrong when it said all shots came from the front?
I see you are speaking nonsense again.Eleven shots eh?
That's not at all consistent with the four to six the police are saying...hmmmmmm
...I wonder why they would lie about a thing like that.
iLOL
You already know the evidence. So why are you speaking nonsense?
Or are you suggesting that the scheme teams non-official autopsy was wrong when it said all shots came from the front?
Eleven shots eh?
That's not at all consistent with the four to six the police are saying...hmmmmmm
...I wonder why they would lie about a thing like that.
I'm suggesting exactly what I said - that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of him.
Do you have any real evidence to the contrary?
If so. let's see it.
:dohI'm suggesting exactly what I said - that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of him.
Do you have any real evidence to the contrary?
If so. let's see it.
:doh
You are suggesting nonsense then.
I say it is likely Brown was still coming, hence the remaining shots.
You retort with just as likely to be laying on the ground with blood seeping out of him, which would follow what I stated, hence the remaining shots.
Your retort is not possible with what is known to us.
All shots came from the front of Brown, and as Brown was found front down, impossible.
Or just as likely that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of multiple bullet wounds, eh?
How can anyone really know if they weren't an eyewitness?
The coroner already confirmed that Brown had been shot in the front 6 times so there's really no use going over which direction Brown was facing when this happened.Listening to what they provided I heard 11 shots also.
The first set of shots equaled to 6. The second set equaled to 5.
What this tells me is that Brown was indeed moving forward. My reasoning for this is simple for anyone with any understanding of shooting a gun. It is much easier to hit a target that is not moving than it is to hit a target that is moving. Since Brown was only hit 6 times according to the coroner that means that the officer was shooting at a moving target. Even assuming that Brown was the claimed 30ft away my 9 year old son could have hit him at least 10 out of the 11 shots fired if he was standing still. I would expect even a half assed trained adult could have hit all 11 times if the target was not moving. So the only logical conclusion is that Brown was indeed moving towards the cop.
There is of course one other explanation, but quite frankly it borders on conspiracy theory and I hate those, besides it wouldn't hold up either.
PS EDIT: I've got a feeling that that "friend" that the person was chatting with was either A: more than just a friend or B: (more likely) That "friend" wasn't really a friend but one of those porn cam girls.
This is exactly the kind of thread people shouldn't make until ALL the evidence is publicly available.Attorney: New audio reveals pause in gunfire when Michael Brown was shot
By Holly Yan, CNNLawyer: Audio shows 11 shots when Michael Brown killed - CNN.com
updated 12:36 AM EDT, Tue August 26, 2014
[...]
In the recording, a quick series of shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then another quick succession of shots.
"I personally heard at least 11" shots, the man's attorney, Lopa Blumenthal, told CNN's Don Lemon.
The man, who asked that his identity not be revealed, lives near the site of the shooting and was close enough to have heard the gunshots, Blumenthal said.
He was speaking to a friend on a video chat service and happened to be recording the conversation at the same time Brown was shot, Blumenthal said.
[...]
11 Shots in 5 seconds.
Short pause between 6 and the other five. Likely Brown was still coming at him.
Just more evidence.
So basically you're a second-hand ear-witness who wasn't there when it happened.
I'm sure that the court will be interested in your opinion.
Or maybe it won't be.
1: I'm just like everyone else on this board, just stating an opinion. No where did I claim that I would be in that court much less that the court would be interested in my opinion. So cut the crap. If you don't like others opinions why are you even on a debate site?
2: What I said was based on my knowledge of shooting a firearm and the coroners report...specifically the coroners report that the Brown family hired to do the autopsy and an audio that was provided by a valid news media outlet. It doesn't matter if I heard it second hand or not, I can still give an opinion on the information provided.
.3: I never stated that what I stated was exactly how things went down, only that it is the logical conclusion based on the information provided and my own personal knowledge of shooting a firearm
Read my post above and compare it to the four eye-witness accounts of what they saw and heard.WhatI hear is the first set of six shots were while Brown was running away and Wilson was chasing him ...Only one of these shots hit Brown because of all the running movement by both, the grazing wound to the right fore-arm.
The pause was when Brown stopped and turned around putting up his hands and falling to his knees.
Now a still target, all the remaining five shots found their mark the last one entering the top of Browns head as he fell to the pavement,
That last one in the group of five was the murder round.
This all fits perfectly with eye-witness testimony of what they saw happen.
The disturbing part is the shot we didn't hear... the one supposedly fired as Brown was supposedly going for Wilson's gun in the car.
I'm sure that if we can hear the other shots this clearly that a shot even fired inside the car would still be audible through the open window.
If it was on the tape I suspect that CNN would have played it, but it starts with the group of six rounds...
Curious eh?
What you hear? iLOLWhatI hear is the first set of six shots were while Brown was running away and Wilson was chasing him ...Only one of these shots hit Brown because of all the running movement by both, the grazing wound to the right fore-arm.
The pause was when Brown stopped and turned around putting up his hands and falling to his knees.
Now a still target, all the remaining five shots found their mark the last one entering the top of Browns head as he fell to the pavement,
That last one in the group of five was the murder round.
This all fits perfectly with eye-witness testimony of what they saw happen.
The disturbing part is the shot we didn't hear... the one supposedly fired as Brown was supposedly going for Wilson's gun in the car.
I'm sure that if we can hear the other shots this clearly that a shot even fired inside the car would still be audible through the open window.
If it was on the tape I suspect that CNN would have played it, but it starts with the group of six rounds...
Curious eh?
Can it shrubnose.What you have said sounds like nonsense to me.
In any case I doubt that any court will be interested in your opinion, since you weren't an eyewitness.
No Jerry.This is exactly the kind of thread people shouldn't make until ALL the evidence is publicly available.
Liars copying a liar. That is all, they are not credible.Read my post above and compare it to the four eye-witness accounts of what they saw and heard.
[video=youtube;fRbiEZ_vIOQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRbiEZ_vIOQ[video]
WhatI hear is the first set of six shots were while Brown was running away and Wilson was chasing him ...Only one of these shots hit Brown because of all the running movement by both, the grazing wound to the right fore-arm.
The pause was when Brown stopped and turned around putting up his hands and falling to his knees.
Now a still target, all the remaining five shots found their mark the last one entering the top of Browns head as he fell to the pavement,
That last one in the group of five was the murder round.
This all fits perfectly with eye-witness testimony of what they saw happen.
The disturbing part is the shot we didn't hear... the one supposedly fired as Brown was supposedly going for Wilson's gun in the car.
I'm sure that if we can hear the other shots this clearly that a shot even fired inside the car would still be audible through the open window.
If it was on the tape I suspect that CNN would have played it, but it starts with the group of six rounds...
Curious eh?
Fine. Now we know what may or may not have happened according to you. :roll:
Me, I'm going to wait until the courts issue their opinions then I'm going to issue my opinion.
If I'm still around after that happens.
No thread should be started until all evidence is in. On any topic. Ever. Only with ALL the evidence can we determin if it was a good shot or a crime. Only then is a public discussion of any real value.Can it shrubnose.
Your position was shown to be incorrect as all shots came from the front.
And since your position can shown to be wrong, yours is what they wont be interested in.
No Jerry.
This is exactly the kind of thread that should be made as the evidence becomes available.
What you are saying is akin to saying that no thread should be started until all the evidence is in, and that is just ridiculous.
Hey folks no Lois Lerner threads until all the evidence is in. :doh
Hey folks, no IRS threads about them targeting Conservative groups until all the evidence is in. :doh
No Jerry, it is exactly the type of thread that should be made to announce evidence as it becomes available.
No you are wrong my top hatted feline friend.What you hear?
There has been no credible evidence that he shot at Brown as Brown was running away.
Only as Brown moved towards him.
Nor is it a credible claim to begin with. As that is not the norm.
Brown's un-official autopsy indicated that all shots came from the front.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?