Slippery Slope
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 2,801
- Reaction score
- 330
- Location
- in a neocon's craw
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
1) I always used the system correctly. Since making an effort to stifle you whiny babies I've had to do much more work with my posts to get them to quote correctly and having to have at least 2 windows open to reference what the hell was being said. So, don't expect it much longer.I am pleased to see that you have chosen to now use the quote code correctly. I appreciate it.
- It's not my computer;
- The guest account I use on it does not allow downloads, so I can't just go get a word program;
- My skill at spelling is so bad that I hardly noticed an error in any of teacher's posts, so I don't even recognize words of my own that need to be looked up;
- Yesterday I discovered that this computer has Firefox anyway, which doesn't have as good of a spell checker as MS Office, which I use on my computer, but is at least something.
Also, you might notice that over the last week, some of my posts have horrible spelling while others are just fine. This is because the public library's computers have MS Office, while my father's computer has no word program at all.
It's so much easier to simply exorcise torrence then assume you know all the facts and begin to make assumptions.
1) I always used the system correctly. Since making an effort to stifle you whiny babies I've had to do much more work with my posts to get them to quote correctly and having to have at least 2 windows open to reference what the hell was being said. So, don't expect it much longer.
2) You didn't rephrase your response so that it's intelligible.
3)I was merely busting your balls.
1) I always used the system correctly. Since making an effort to stifle you whiny babies I've had to do much more work with my posts to get them to quote correctly and having to have at least 2 windows open to reference what the hell was being said. So, don't expect it much longer.
2) You didn't rephrase your response so that it's intelligible.
3)I was merely busting your balls.
Firefox didn't pick up any errors in that post.
****
The Government is secular.
The Nation is not secular.
The secular government can recognize religious aspect of the non-secular nation. This is not a violation of the 1st amendment as there is no separation of Church and The People.
Recognition does not establish a governmental church, nor give any church governmental authority.
Therefore: Recognition is not endorsement. Recognition is not establishment.
Recognition is nothing more then saying "yup, you believe that".
I'm a Saints fan, and Yankees, I've been known to get a little demonic at times when watchning my teams, especially the Saints.
Fine, you're absolutely right, I was too narrow by pointing to xians. This is because xianity is the majority.
Hows this then - the religious get favoritism for their religions. Feel better now that I included the other religions? :roll:
:rofl Good one!Simply by being a Yankees fan proves you have a demonic aspect about you. :mrgreen:
Those were anti-theist government, not atheist. Atheist governments tend towards secularism.
spiritually and emotionally it is not.
Don't bring up that Superbowl. Mother****ing Rex Grossman...I hate him almost as much as I hate Peyton Manning. Single handedly lost that Superbowl. Could not convert a damned 3rd down all game. D had Indy beat, just needed a little O for the win...nothing. And now, now I have to deal with Minn being if first place because we lost the second game to them...and they have to lose out whereas the Bears must win out to make the playoffs. God damned Vikings! I hope the lot of them burn in hell.
amen
But you wrongly (go figure) attribute atheism to that. Most of those deaths were due to starvation because of a bad government. Atheism has no ideals or dogma to follow, only a lack of belief in the supernatural. If I run over a squirrel with my car it's not because my car hates squirrels.
and wouldn't an anti-theist government be filled with atheists by definition?
Most atheists think people are dumb for being religious...
:lol: uhm ok....
let me ask you then, the "Atheists" that have those sighns, and posters like slip slope, are they "atheists" or "anti theists"
and wouldn't an anti-theist government be filled with atheists by definition?
I think most people could agree with this. BTW Love the Avatar with Tim.What is dumb is trying to convert people to a certain point of view, or disdaining them for their views because they are different from the ones you (general "you") have.
What is dumb is trying to convert people to a certain point of view, or disdaining them for their views because they are different from the ones you (general "you") have.
I agree but since Christians and many religion aren't going to back down on that tradition, why should atheists?
...because atheists have better things to do?
It's not a basic tenet of Christianity to do that, some sects of the belief do, most don't. Save your energy for the ones who deserve a good bashing, trust me, I won't stand in your way.I agree but since Christians and many religion aren't going to back down on that tradition, why should atheists?
I agree but since Christians and many religion aren't going to back down on that tradition, why should atheists?
So atheists are an organized group now who espouse beliefs?
So atheists are an organized group now who espouse beliefs?
So atheists are an organized group now who espouse beliefs?
They meet every Tuesday after the Anarchists assembly.
BTW Love the Avatar with Tim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?