Atheists, lets get real

[rahl]

i did read it and saw one objection from one guy

This shows you didn't read it.

it wasnt a peer reviewed journal

so does this.

 

[TypicalRussian]

This shows you didn't read it.


so does this.

right, but i never claimed it was a peer reviewed journal

and how did i not read it?

 

[rahl]

right, but i never claimed it was a peer reviewed journal

and how did i not read it?

you don't know what it says, this is how we know you didn't read it. facts remain, you can not demonstrate in any way that a god or gods exist. the ontological argument has been refuted.

 

[TypicalRussian]

you don't know what it says, this is how we know you didn't read it. facts remain, you can not demonstrate in any way that a god or gods exist. the ontological argument has been refuted.

it was one objection about how you cant define God

 

[rahl]

it was one objection about how you cant define God

which shows you didn't read it. Notice how you keep avoiding the fact that you can not in any way demonstrate a god or gods exist? I noticed, and so did everyone else.

 

[TypicalRussian]

which shows you didn't read it. Notice how you keep avoiding the fact that you can not in any way demonstrate a god or gods exist? I noticed, and so did everyone else.

again, how didnt i read, that was the one objection presented

 

[rahl]

again, how didnt i read, that was the one objection presented

the fact you claim there was only one objection shows you didn't read it. Can you admit that you can not in any way demonstrate that a god or gods exists?

 

[danielpalos]

the ten commandments are wonderful things and its a shame it has gone in the dumspter wiht the current culture

Only right wingers allege our pandemic is a Hoax.

 

[TypicalRussian]

Only right wingers allege our pandemic is a Hoax.

irrelavant

 

[TypicalRussian]

the fact you claim there was only one objection shows you didn't read it. Can you admit that you can not in any way demonstrate that a god or gods exists?

what other objections were there

 

[blarg]

your right, he loves to talk to people who actulaly belive and trust in him

why would a god want faith and not build trust by interacting with people?

but having faith is necessary for false religions with false gods

you don't find it suspicious that you care more then your god that you put in more effort then your god

 

[blarg]

because you have to trust hom first

oh why would that be ?

 

[blarg]

we have talked about the ontological argument in every thread we have engaged in, lets move on

then you should have plenty of examples post away

 

[TypicalRussian]

then you should have plenty of examples post away

dude, lets move on

 

[blarg]

how is it malicious to only open up to people who trust and like you?

well if people harm others in your name because they trust and like you ( but still somehow dont know you ) that's malicious when you are the reason all of it happens

affection and trust are built on experience when they are not built on pure fantasy you have to put yourself out their to gain those

it should be setting off alarm bells that only the people who rely want god to exist and love the idea of it are the only one who can hear from it

that's setting yourself up to see what you want whether its there or not

 

[blarg]

no its not, the ontological argument is a perfect demonstration that God exists

no its pretty easy to refute you dont put much effort into defending it either

 

[blarg]

dude, lets move on

then you should have plenty of examples post away

 

[TypicalRussian]

oh why would that be ?

because he said so

 

[TypicalRussian]

why would a god want faith and not build trust by interacting with people?

but having faith is necessary for false religions with false gods

you don't find it suspicious that you care more then your god that you put in more effort then your god

god wantsfaith for good reasons

 

[TypicalRussian]

then you should have plenty of examples post away

copy anf pase

 

[TypicalRussian]

no its pretty easy to refute you dont put much effort into defending it either

no its not

 

[TypicalRussian]

well if people harm others in your name because they trust and like you ( but still somehow dont know you ) that's malicious when you are the reason all of it happens

affection and trust are built on experience when they are not built on pure fantasy you have to put yourself out their to gain those

it should be setting off alarm bells that only the people who rely want god to exist and love the idea of it are the only one who can hear from it

that's setting yourself up to see what you want whether its there or not

no its not malicious because he kniws you and you rejected him

 

[rahl]

what other objections were there

Can you admit you can’t demonstrate in any way a god or gods exist?

 

[rahl]

no its not

Yes it is. I even gave you a refutation with citation.

 

[watsup]

god wantsfaith for good reasons

Are you now speaking for God? And how exactly do you know what God wants?????????????