- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 11,655
- Reaction score
- 3,612
- Location
- WA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It's not always about screwing conservatives, you know. :roll:The CIA’s motive is clear enough: The U.S. government is afraid the Los Zetas drug cartel will mount a successful coup d’etat against the government of Felipe Calderon.
Founded by ex-Mexican special forces, the Zetas already control huge swaths of Mexican territory. They have the organization, arms and money needed to take over the entire country.
Former CIA pilot Robert Plumlee and former CIA operative and DEA Director Phil Jordan recently said the brutally efficient Mexican drug cartel has stockpiled thousands of weapons to disrupt and influence Mexico’s national elections in 2012. There’s a very real chance the Zetas cartel could subvert the political process completely, as it has throughout the regions it controls.
In an effort to prevent a Los Zetas takeover, Uncle Sam has gotten into bed with the rival Sinaloa cartel, which has close ties to the Mexican military. Recent court filings by former Sinaloa cartel member Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla, currently in U.S. custody, reveal that the United States allowed the Sinaloas to fly a 747 cargo plane packed with cocaine into American airspace - unmolested.
The CIA made sure the trade wasn’t one-way. It persuaded the ATF to create Operation Fast and Furious - a “no strings attached” variation of the agency’s previous firearms sting. By design, the ATF operation armed the Mexican government’s preferred cartel on the street level near the American border, where the Zetas are most active.
Crickets chirp in the silence by the left over this. Especially in light of the blown way out of proportion reaction to Bush's Attorney General Gonzales just for firing some attorneys, which work at the total discretion of the President anyway, but hey that was Bush right, not your anointed one.
Another, frankly far more plausible, conspiracy theory:
FARAGO: Was CIA behind Operation Fast and Furious? - Washington Times
It's not always about screwing conservatives, you know. :roll:
The idea that Obama purposely put 2,000 guns into the hands of drug lords (while purposely making them trackable) just to make some sort of attack on the 2nd Amendment is completely stupid and paranoid. It brings to mind the liberal reaction to the Tuscon shooting, which we all know conservatives were furious about.
Another, frankly far more plausible, conspiracy theory:
FARAGO: Was CIA behind Operation Fast and Furious? - Washington Times
QUOTE]~----- In an effort to prevent a Los Zetas takeover, Uncle Sam has gotten into bed with the rival Sinaloa cartel, which has close ties to the Mexican military. Recent court filings by former Sinaloa cartel member Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla, currently in U.S. custody, reveal that the United States allowed the Sinaloas to fly a 747 cargo plane packed with cocaine into American airspace - unmolested. ------~
So lemme get this straight. American put guns in the hands of cartell in bed with mexican militiary. Meanwhile police chiefs die.
I don't think it was specifically to attack our 2nd amendment rights (and I'm a big 2nd amendment defender btw) I think it was more like they wanted to throw the anti-Gun lobby a bone and saw this as an opportunity to do that. I would think the opportunity just presented itself and it wasn't planned that way. Saying it was planned would give wayyyyy too much credit to this Administration.
I run hot and cold on this administration. On some days I think they are cunning radicals, on other days I think they are a bunch of stumbling morons.
I think that assuming the government incompetent is not really wise. Because no one in their right mind would think its a good idea giving drug gangs in another country who not subject to our laws or jurisdiction a **** load of weapons unless there was a ulterior motive.
The real answer is to legalize pot and put the cartels out of business.
Cocaine & Heroin too? I dont think so... pot is hardly the problem here.
Considering the piles of bodies & mass graves turing up down there I'd think it would be perfectly justified to start taking out these cartel leaders with drone strikes as it seems to be working fairly well against Al Qaeda whom hasnt killed as many recently as these drug lords have.
Actually it is a lot harder to smuggle pot across the border (because it requires alot more space) than the others and less profitable.Pot is worth hundreds of millions of dollars a year to the cartels, and is by far their largest export. As for the coke and smack, let's decriminalize pot first then reevaluate a few years later. Doubling down on a drug war that is impossible to win is not the answer.
Holder should be in an orange jump suit right about now but you know this president is not going to do anything about it. Hopefully the Republican that gets elected in 2012 will pursue this until every last one of these crooks is behind bars where they deserve to be.
Part of me knows you probably right, the other part says these guys in the White House and DoJ are book smart and real world dumb. It probably sounded really good on paper but reality is, it was some real dumb **** to try... everyone at the lower levels knew it.
The idea that Obama purposely put 2,000 guns into the hands of drug lords (while purposely making them trackable) just to make some sort of attack on the 2nd Amendment is completely stupid and paranoid. It brings to mind the liberal reaction to the Tuscon shooting, which we all know conservatives were furious about.
This is one of the fishiest of things that has happened in the wacky world of covert government ops in a long time. Yes, Holder must go, but the story is much bigger than him. The US is pretty obviously playing games with the cartels, and my personal belief is that this was a completely intentional arms transfer that somehow got out into the daylight. I bet Alex Jones and Mike Ruppert are having a field day with this one.
The real answer is to legalize pot and put the cartels out of business.
I'm not against legalizing pot but I'm just curious.....why would the cartels not simply expand into cocaine and other harder drugs?
I'm not against legalizing pot but I'm just curious.....why would the cartels not simply expand into cocaine and other harder drugs?
Cocaine & Heroin too? I dont think so... pot is hardly the problem here.
Considering the piles of bodies & mass graves turing up down there I'd think it would be perfectly justified to start taking out these cartel leaders with drone strikes as it seems to be working fairly well against Al Qaeda whom hasnt killed as many recently as these drug lords have.
4,000 Americans died in Iraq from 2003 to 2010, and 13,000 Mexicans died in the drug battles of that country in 2010 alone. Although Steyn doesn’t get too much into it, he touches on the facts that the United States has concentrated on reducing supply and transport of drugs in foreign countries, rather than on the demand in the United States, and that it has endlessly taken the dragnet through the ghettoes rather than through the middle-class university students and young white-collar urban youth. The emphasis has been on imprisonment rather than treatment, and it is not credible that the greatest military power in the world could not control its own borders if it was serious. While this is not a particular focus, the War on Drugs is a sinkhole of corruption and hypocrisy, as is much of the rest of the American legal system.
I'm not against legalizing pot but I'm just curious.....why would the cartels not simply expand into cocaine and other harder drugs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?