That's because Kerry like the French and the Opposition don't know how to count. Yet they still like to admit they don't know who they are dealing with nor who is all behind who.
Of course your narrative concerning the FSA being the good guys. Was already debunked. Which again produce a link to the good guys that can attain power and who they are and what they are standing for in Syria?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...france-falsified-number-dead-chem-attack.html
Regarding Syria, you find RT, PressTV, Assad and random bloggers more reliable than the US government and the UN?
That's CT world.
To bad mine include The Main Sources where most others get theirs. That would be the AP, Reuters and UPI. Then I have CNN, The BBC, Time, ABC, Foreign Policy. Stars and Stripes and Strafor. Local news.....as well as RT Asian Times Pravada and Al jazerra.
Regarding Syria.....you are the one that is Light on links and sources. Also you are the one that cant figure out about validated referenced sources. Which is why you still deflect to the issue.
Which just like Now.....you can't produce **** on your Good Guy theory.
I've provided references to secretary Kerry, president Obama and the UN.
You provide references to RT, PressTV, Assad and blogs.
The difference is clear. This is like debating with a Truther.
Says it all ECO.....on Syria.....you don't know jack ****.
Your arguments are hysterical, based on CT world and supported by blogs and totalitarian state media. I understand if you are passionately anti-war, but presenting Truther-level evidence, while ignoring all legit sources, is bad form.
My position is based on US and UN investigations.
Looks like you were just proven to be not only wrong.....but a liar as well.
Yeah, sure.
“When we see that the U.S. genuinely stands for stability in our region, stops threatening us with military intervention and stops supplying terrorists with weapons, then we will consider it possible to finalize all necessary procedures and they will become legitimate and acceptable for Syria," Assad told RIA News.President Obama must promise not to arm rebel forces or Syrian dictator Bashar Assad will not hand over his chemical weapons, the embattled leader told a Russian state media outlet today while demanding that Israel also surrender its nuclear arsenal.
Assad tells Obama to stop arming rebels, or no deal | WashingtonExaminer.com
I've provided references to secretary Kerry, president Obama and the UN.
.
Anyone who thinks that Israel will ever give up any weapons is living in a dream world.
It's not going to happen.
And you can bet that the USA will continue supplying arms to whoever it wants to supply arms to.
They (USA maybe and Arab league for sure, with some support from other natiosn)are arming the islamists.
Look at Egypt as an example.
Morsi is a fanatic, a islamist fanatic.You think that will bring peace to the region?
At least Mubarak could be paid for to keep the peace and he was a secularist. That's why he never declared war on anyone since he came in power in 1980 if memory serves.
Anyway. So lets say 1980, Mubarak comes in real power. How many wars did Mubarak start against Israel? None in 30years. Peace. How many did his predecessors do 30 years before?
at least 3 + sponsored terrorist camps and attacks.
And now Morsi supporters hold Sinai.
It will be a long time before there is peace in Syria.
No matter which side 'wins' the civil/religious war there it won't be good for that region or the world.
Even though they were defending their country, how was helping Islamic radicals in Afghanistan and the problems that would cause unforeseen?
We had no particular national interest in the struggle.
We didn't get involved in the struggle between China and Tibet, why Afghanistan?
Both sides have chemical weapons.
That majority of the FSA are made up of Defectors/Traitors,
which happened to be mostly Sunni. The same Sunni that Assad allowed into Command positions with in his Armed Forces. The Sunni in which they systematically kill Shia. Then go after Christians. Who btw way Are standing with Assad and not the Rebels/ Terrorists.
Assad is an Alawite and they are tied to the Shia.
Moreover they have come out and stated that No Alawites will be allowed in any shaping of the Future of Syria. They will not be allowed to be in government.
To top that off......Al Nusra which has 30 opposition brigades, Councils and civilian committees. Have stated they do not recognize the FSA nor the STNC. That the FSA and STNC will not be deciding anything about the Future of Syria. Which now they just Gangster the FSA and take what they want.
<<<<<Sends out Town Crier......Hereye hereye.....Come one and come all.....Check out the game.....of facts and fictions.
MMC. <<<<<Facts and smack talk.
ECO. <<<<<Fiction, made up Hyperbole, deflection and tangent.
Match Point.....Game, Set, and Title. Goes to MMC!!!!!
NEXT!
You mean someone predicted that an militant from a wealthy family would develop a dislike of foreigners from his time in Afghanistan, and that later our Ally would invade a neutral country next to the militants country of birth, and that the militant would at that point gathered a group of fighters that he then offered to defend his homeland only to have it turned down by our offer of assistance, and that he would use this as justification for a terrorist attack?
The US was ideologically opposed to the spread of communism.
When the struggle was over we didn't turn Afghanistan into an ally. The Taliban moved in, took over and now we've lost thousands of American lives there.
We didn't have the opportunity or the means.
At best, rebel control of chemical weapons is disputed.
You need to view our foreign policy in it's entire context. We have waged wars of preemption, police actions and regime change. Those reasons for war are questionable at best. We should go to war when our national security is threatened or our interests abroad come under attack. The last great hope of mankind should use it's military with great restraint.
We assisted the mujadeen in Afghanistan for no other reason than to screw with the Russians.
Russia, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, is no longer communist, allowing it's citizens some property rights and a degree of capitalism.
We could have come to the aid of Tibet, we could stick our nose in Kashmir.
We don't because it's not in our national interest. Neither is Syria.
The rebels claim that they have chemical weapons. Are you calling them liars? Just curious.
Actually, if I recall correctly most are civilians that took up arms.
The FSA has stated they do not view this as a Sectarian conflict.
The FSA has Alawite fighters within their ranks.
“But there will be no reprisals, as we also have Alawites in our ranks who oppose the [Bashar] al-Assad regime,” Al-Aday , FSA Officer
They are still outnumbered by the 80,000 strong FSA.
Well then you would be mistaken.....got a link on that most of the FSA are civilians?
The unified command includes many with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to Salafists, who follow a puritanical interpretation of Islam. It excludes the most senior officers who have defected from Assad’s military, according to Reuters.....snip~
Seems their own ideology puts that in dispute.
Got a link that some of the Alawites are fighting in the Rebel/Terrorists ranks?
First off their Numbers were inflated from the get go.
Moreover they had Fighters coming in and joining their Army from several Countries.
Moreover Al Nusra has the backing of 29 Civilian Councils and Committees.
The fact that you just awarded victory to yourself stinks of desperation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?