- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 5,520
- Reaction score
- 3,934
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Only in your mind.
The rockets used in the attack are not known to be in rebel hands. It was Assad.
No. Just look here, scroll down to the first table: https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch1s1-6.html
The standard terms used to define levels of confidence in this report are as given in the IPCC Uncertainty Guidance Note, namely:
Very high confidence At least 9 out of 10 chance
Fine.That's a climate change working group report.
That has nothing to do with the report in question.
Fine.
Please show us their standard.
Very high confidence At least 9 out of 10 chance
The US report says High Confidence. Not Very high Confidence.
The US report says "the highest confidence below confirmed". In the climate change working group, that's 9/10. I can't believe you would try to associate the exact words used from two completely different reports from entirely different sources.
That's what the writer of the report say. Do you always believe the government?
Fine.You pulled that 20% from nowhere. Just admit it.
That's a climate change working group report.
That has nothing to do with the report in question.
Further, it contradicts his numbers.
If that's where he got his numbers, he's being dishonest about them. The report in question specifies that the confidence is just below "confirmation", thus it is the highest degree of confidence, not 8/10 (the second highest, in the IPCC report).
Anyone could pull a random report and apply different standards. That's ridiculous.
Very high confidence: At least 9 out of 10 chance
High confidence: 8 out of 10 chance
Medium confidence: About 5 out of 10 chance
Low confidence: 2 out of 10 chance
Very low confidence: Less than 1 out of 10 chance
Actually, Eco's point was that my numbers match the ICCCP, and were not the topic of government assessments.Actually it does go along with his numbers
Very high confidence At least 9 out of 10 chance
High confidence About 8 out of 10 chance
Medium confidence About 5 out of 10 chance
Low confidence About 2 out of 10 chance
Very low confidence Less than 1 out of 10 chance
Planar said
Actually, Eco's point was that my numbers match the ICCCP, and were not the topic of government assessments.
Ooop... CCCP... IPCC... Understandable mistake, right?
The U.S. has photo evidence!!! Will John Kerry hold up a vial of yellowcake in front of the U.N.?3. The chems were withdrawn from an Assad facility, without resistance. The US claims photo evidence of this.
4. The rockets were prepared, assembled and launched from ~10 different locations within Assad territory, without resistance.
go to you tube and watch gen. Wesley Clark interview, Syria and Iran are the two countrys left on the agenda for middle east domination by a govt. that is out of control, that has hijacked the constitution, and that is spending you into a depression you may not be able to climb out of.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?