• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovations

creativedreams

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
239
Location
Timbuktu
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Article in "World Architecture News" about Three World Trade Center building collapses


Richard Gage article on 9/11 WTC contolled demolitions appears in WorldArchitectureNews.com

Conspiracy theory or hidden truth? The 9/11 enigmas...
By
Richard Gage, AIA, Gregg Roberts, and David Chandler
In all likelihood, you are unaware of the most important facts involving the destructions of the World Trade Center buildings. Nearly all the mainstream information sources and government officials have kept crucial information hidden from the public. This brief article will provide a clear explanation as to what actually happened to the Twin Towers and Building 7 (WTC 7) on September 11, 2001.
Readers can add comments at the end of the article.



Only the people on the low end of the I.Q. curve can't see that the World Trade Center destruction was an inside job.

All the solid concrete for the Twin Towers was literally exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of pulverized dust which settled throughout the city.

Likely all 4 planes were remote operated and the many small explosives were placed in the World Trade Center buildings during their many months of continuous construction renovations up until the very day of 9/11.

The CEO for the company that did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Center buildings went on to be Mayor of Dallas Texes and then....

The CEO for the company that did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Center buildings was appointed by Bush to the Presidents Commission on Whitehouse Fellows.

What a metaphore when you type the link for the Presidents Commission on Whitehouse Fellows it types as Fellows About Commission. (or corrupt profits)

The Pentagon got hit in the very spot that it was going through construction renovations and in the only part of the Pentagon that underwent reinforcement specifically for a possible impact.

The company that did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Center buildings has worked hand and hand on demolition projects with CDI (Controlled Demolition Inc)

Look at the website for Controlled Demolition Inc and it states right on it they work on sensitive demolition projects that are "classified" for the Department of Defense both domestically and internatioally.

The company that did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Center buildings also constructed for NAVSEA the new research center that designs and produces energetics and accelerants for the Military and also the only reliable source of Aluminum nano-powders (thermite).

Every bit of this is verifiable with reliable sources so look for yourself unless you prefer to be an ignorant *****.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Who knows exactly how and why it was pulled off...there needs to be an independent investigation to get the details out...

Two of the hijackers were discovered to be tenants in a building owned by a CIA informant.

Perhaps the hijackers were lured on the planes by the CIA and then remote controls ensured their precise destinations?

The part where a CIA informant owned the building where two of the hijackers were discovered to reside is verifiable.

The 9/11 Commission Report was quoted by the very people involved in the report as being stonewalled by the Administration from doing any real investigating and people directly involved in the report are saying it is a National scandel.

The 9/11 Commission Report was denied any investigating into the CIA informant that was landlord for two of the hijackers.

Again this is all verifiable with legitimate sources.
 
Last edited:
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

One thing is for sure...there better be a new and independent investigation before the World does it for us.

Many countries are now looking into 9/11 independently.

This was shown on Italian Primetime Television and is an example of what is brewing outside the U.S.

Agian you won't hear of this in America because the Corporate corrupt Administration has imposed Corporate Media blackout on anything that questions the "official story(fairytale)" for 9/11

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEweM7WfGts"]YouTube - Italian news covers 9/11 Truth![/ame]



Here is an example of what is being aired in Denmark's National Primetime News Television and is an example of what is brewing outside the U.S.

Agian you won't hear of this in America because the Corporate corrupt Administration has imposed Corporate Media blackout on anything that questions the "official story(fairytale)" for 9/11

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jze33vZCpwo"]YouTube - 9/11 truth in MSM, Niels Harrit talks about WTC 7 on TV2 in december 2007. ( english subs )[/ame]



Here is an example of what is now being aired on Canada's National Primetime News Television and is an example of what is brewing outside the U.S.

Agian you won't hear of this in America because the Corporate corrupt Administration has imposed Corporate Media blackout on anything that questions the "official story(fairytale)" for 9/11

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWy20gUMSGk"]YouTube - Richard Gage 9/11 truth on The Standard 18th April 2009 pt. 1/3[/ame]



Here is an example of what is being aired on Russian National Primetime News Television...and is an example of what is brewing outside the U.S.

Agian you won't hear of this in America because the Corporate corrupt Administration has imposed Corporate Media blackout on anything that questions the "official story(fairytale)" for 9/11

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0U9xbi7DKYU"]YouTube - 9/11 on Russian news[/ame]
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

NEVER in the history of America have so many prominant people World wide publicly stated the U.S. government may have committed tyranny and murder...

People need to get a clue as to the magnitude of what is going on.

Jesse Ventura explains it very well in this interview.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apn2UcpG2L0"]YouTube - Jesse Ventura:9/11"Now or Never"1/4[/ame]
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Charlie Sheen, building up steam.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU&feature=related"]YouTube - Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama[/ame]
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

It's quite clear that a massive cover up has happened here and a grave injustice to the american people. The Dublin Group has confirmed that jets did not hit the trade center...that they were actually dirigibles with trick photography, but you won't here that from the mainstream media...
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

It's quite clear that a massive cover up has happened here and a grave injustice to the american people. The Dublin Group has confirmed that jets did not hit the trade center...that they were actually dirigibles with trick photography, but you won't here that from the mainstream media...

Unless you have a way to prove that... do everyone a favor and stick to what can be proven...

The fact of the matter is that the damage done to the WTC buildings was definately consistent with being struck by planes. Not to mention... you know... the fact that everyone and their dog has seen footage of the planes hitting the buildings.

How are you going to say that trick photography was used when there were people independantly filming the event at the same time... let's not be rediculous here.

It's within the realm of possibility that the planes were actually remote controlled drones... BUT even if that's the case it's still planes that would have hit the buildings.

Who the hell is this 'dublin group'?? Did you... um... make it up? It's hard enough to get people to look at the honest evidence from 9-11 without having people go into unsustainable theories about 'no-planes' or 'nuclear devices'. Thee's enough real evidence to warrant an investigation, but going around telling people that the WTC wasn't even hit by planes is little better then counter-productive.

Thanks.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Unless you have a way to prove that... do everyone a favor and stick to what can be proven....

Nicely said...there is a ton of disinformation (intentional?) on the net to filter through that creates a huge smokescreen around the core incriminating facts that are indisputable.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Rosie O'Donnell really showed a lot of resolve when she stuck up for what's right and risked her carreer........

I really respect her and she is obviously quite intelligent.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNl964zavcA"]YouTube - 9/11 CONSPIRACY - ROSIE O'DONNELL TALKS FALSE FLAG BLDG #7[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Right after 9/11 we had the Anthrax threat that would have provided the link between the "terrorist sleeper cells" here in the U.S. to the "mobile weapons labs" in Iraq but got foiled by a Scientist whistle blower who proved the Anthrax came from a military base right here in the U.S.

All that came out of this investigation was the Scientist whistle blowers alleged suicide and now his wife blames the U.S. government.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

NASA Astrophysicist speaks about American corruption


The NIST Report that explained the collapses of the Twin Towers was manipulated by the Administration and even Physicists and Scientists that work for NASA etc are saying it was politically manipulated to the extent it literally re-writes physics.


The 3 World Trade Center buildings are scientifically proven to have collapse from many explosives in controlled demolition form and is being aired on the National News Television in MANY countries now but our Corporate corrupt Administration has imposed a Corporate Media blackout to anything that questions the official story for 9/11.


2.jpg


Here is a link where an Astrophysicist who worked for NASA for almost 40 yrs states "seeing the huge cloud of pulverized concrete dust and the massive steel members being hurled horizontally leaves no doubt in my mind that explosives were use to bring down the World Trade Center Buildings"

Seven Federal Engineers and Scientists Say NIST Report is a Political Manipulation to the Extent it Literally Re-Writes Physics:
[ame="http://www.scribd.com/doc/7646792/Seven-Senior-Federal-Engineers-and-Scientists-Call-for-New-911-Investigation"]Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9-11 Investigation@@AMEPARAM@@/docinfo/7646792?access_key=key-7o5v57mmw38ixvwgl4j@@AMEPARAM@@7646792@@AMEPARAM@@key-7o5v57mmw38ixvwgl4j[/ame]

wtc-collapse-01.jpg


wtc_collapse2.jpg


Building #7 collapsed concentrically and symetrically along the entire length of the block long building at almost the speed of gravity crushing its way down the path of most resistance through its own support columns down into its own footprint

Basic physics shows that the collapse speeds leaves no room for resistance from the many vertical steel support columns. The only way these collapse speeds can be accomplished is through explosives concentrically blowing all the support resistance out of the way in symetrical sequence.

wtc7ani.gif
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

I have to admit, I've wondered about one thing concerning 9/11 myself:

Why were U.S. fighter planes sent out over the Atlantic when clearly all of the flights, including Flight 11, were inbound over the U.S.? For example, Boston Logan air traffic control knew exactly where Flight 11 was. They had it on their radar even though Flight 11's transponder was turned off. So, why send it out over the Atlantic? In fact, according to the official flight paths of all four planes, not one flew over the Atlantic.

Before anyone comes out with the claim that NORAD's strategic mission is mainly to halt threats that come from over open waters into U.S. airspace, let me correct you; NORAD's primary mission has always been to provide aerial protection over the lower 48. So, why send combat fighters over the Atlantic when all they had to do was ask Boston Logan initially exactly where they had Flight 11?

Reviewing flight times from takeoff to hijacking to crash, it's obvious that things happened relatively quickly especially between the time any one plane was hijacked until they crashed (whether they hit their intended target or not). I still wonder why fighter jets were sent over the Atlantic and why only two were ever scrambled?
 
Last edited:
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

I have to admit, I've wondered about one thing concerning 9/11 myself:

Why were U.S. fighter planes sent out over the Atlantic when clearly all of the flights, including Flight 11, were inbound over the U.S.? For example, Boston Logan air traffic control knew exactly where Flight 11 was. They had it on their radar even though Flight 11's transponder was turned off. So, why send it out over the Atlantic? In fact, according to the official flight paths of all four planes, not one flew over the Atlantic.

Before anyone comes out with the claim that NORAD's strategic mission is mainly to halt threats that come from over open waters into U.S. airspace, let me correct you; NORAD's primary mission has always been to provide aerial protection over the lower 48. So, why send combat fighters over the Atlantic when all they had to do was ask Boston Logan initially exactly where they had Flight 11?

Reviewing flight times from takeoff to hijacking to crash, it's obvious that things happened relatively quickly especially between the time any one plane was hijacked until they crashed (whether they hit their intended target or not). I still wonder why fighter jets were sent over the Atlantic and why only two were ever scrambled?

There is a guy on another Forum that has this pegged.

I should look at it closer and maybe try and explain it as well as he does....perhaps even link him here.

He explains how our Fighter Jets intercept planes every day for many decades flying over restricted airspace all over America....etc.
 
Last edited:
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

compareln.jpg
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

It is a daunting task to sort through all the disinformation...

We may never know the whole truth.

It is best to try and stick with core facts that are verifiable.

The Corporate corrupt Administrations have fabricated Corporate profiting wars that are literally sucking all the money out of the U.S. and its citizens.


The Corporate corrupt Administration has also imposed a Corporate Media blackout on anything that questions the "official story" that was spoon fed to the Media.

Everything about 9/11 came from the Administration and the 9/11 Commission Report was stonewalled from doing any real investigation on their own.

The very people involved in the 9/11 Commission Report are saying they were stonewalled by the Administration and it is a National scandel.

Right now there are meetings going on in Parliments around the World on 9/11 and what is being said about the U.S. is not good.

Examples:

Leaders in the Parliment in the United Kingdom were quoted as saying...
"The U.S. global war on terrorism is bogus. The U.S. Government played some roll in the destruction wrought that day."

Leaders in the Parliment in Japan were quoted as saying...
"The story the U.S. put out for 9/11 is a made up fairytale. We did not do any investigating for the Japanese Nationals that died from the crimes of 9/11. We need to investigate the real suspects for 9/11."

This is verifiable if you are interested in making sure. Just do a google search and you can find this in legitimate News sources World wide.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

There is a guy on another Forum that has this pegged.

I should look at it closer and maybe try and explain it as well as he does....perhaps even link him here.

He explains how our Fighter Jets intercept planes every day for many decades flying over restricted airspace all over America....etc.

Then finding Flight 11 (or any of the other 3 planes) shouldn't have been that much of a problem considering at least one other commercial jet liner found it. I just find it interesting in a odd way that two well training fighter pilots went outbound over the Atlantic while competent air traffic controllers had the flight on radar and could have easily directed any fighter plane right to it before it crashed into the WTC. That's just very odd to me and has never been explained to this Navy vets' satisfaction. Everything else I can sorta let go; it's easily explained away (whether I believe it all 100% is another story). But this SNAFU...nope; not buying it.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Russia Today joins the 911 truth movement ..four videos


As well as showing stock footage taken on the day of the attacks during station breaks, and suggesting that the prompt identification of OBL as the principle culprit was suspicious, RT has an extensive file of 911 related videos at the following URL.

911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART I: 3 towers, 2 jets - RT

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN9d2XUWzus"]YouTube - 'Part of US government and Congress lied about 9/11'[/ame]

US government and Congress lied about 9/11.. Giulietto Chiesa, an EU MP, 2004-2009.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htAFmcYBLtQ"]YouTube - Terrifying Live Report Of 9/11 attack. Part 1.[/ame]

911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part I: 3 towers, 2 jets, Osama bin Laden.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbT4eYj_HPc"]YouTube - Terrifying Live Report Of 9/11 attack. Part 2[/ame]

911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part 2. "We designed the buildings to resist the impact of one or more airliners, said Frank De Martini, WTC construction manager.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=472xDWrijYg"]YouTube - Terrifying Live Report Of 9/11 attack. Part 3. Inexplicable (and ignored) collapse of WTC 7[/ame]

911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part 3. The inexplicable collapse of WTC 7
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Ex pilot brings some talking points to the 9/11 conspiracy.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWOi1F34Nyo"]YouTube - The Alex Jones Show:Former Airline Pilot Talks About The Doomsday Planes on 9/11[/ame]
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Then finding Flight 11 (or any of the other 3 planes) shouldn't have been that much of a problem considering at least one other commercial jet liner found it. I just find it interesting in a odd way that two well training fighter pilots went outbound over the Atlantic while competent air traffic controllers had the flight on radar and could have easily directed any fighter plane right to it before it crashed into the WTC. That's just very odd to me and has never been explained to this Navy vets' satisfaction. Everything else I can sorta let go; it's easily explained away (whether I believe it all 100% is another story). But this SNAFU...nope; not buying it.

It is because those Air Force fighters were not in communication with the Air Traffic controllers. 9-11 showed a major lack of communication inside the US, both before 9-11, and afterwords.

I find it strange how you "Truthers" can't get a straight story together. Missiles, holograms, remote controlled planes, when will you guys settle on something? I mean it will probably be aliens from Area 51, but at least it will be easier to show you guys why you are wrong when you don't go changing your stories every 10 minutes.
 
Last edited:
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

It is because those Air Force fighters were not in communication with the Air Traffic controllers. 9-11 showed a major lack of communication inside the US, both before 9-11, and afterwords.

Not to mention that Dick Cheney was THE ONLY man that could have issued shoot down orders on that day... the next day or week (I forget precisely, but it was shortly after 9-11) he gave up that power.

I find it strange how you "Truthers" can't get a straight story together. Missiles, holograms, remote controlled planes, when will you guys settle on something?

I'll issue the challenge to you as well to debate the facts on 9-11, and you'll see for yourself how the official version is not possible, first... second that at the very least it was known that the attack was coming and nothing was done... then, take it a step further and show you how ONLY elements within the governement / millitary structure COULD HAVE orchestrated the attack.

- Missiles : In the pentagon seems likely but not guaranteed... just in that the pentagon itself had 6 reinforced concrete walls punctured through by the fuselage of the plane, yet a window lined up with where the engines SHOULD have hit weren't damaged. It's an anomoly that deserves investigation.
- Holograms : Disinformation... people out to look like cooks to help discredit any legitimate research
- Remote controlled planes : It's possible that the planes may have had control taken remotely WHILE the hijackings were taking place to guarantee that the planes would hit the targets... the technology exists, but the evidence that this was done is speculative at best.

One thing that CAN be settled on is that it's been PROVEN that a high-tech nano-particle thermite was found in all dust samples collected on 9-11, and within the week after. This is a product that is ONLY available to the millitary of the US and perhaps Japan and China, all that can be obtained about the actual product is the product litterature describing. The particles are in the 0.00000200 metres range, the size of particles you could not create at home.

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon - washingtonpost.com - By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.


[qute]I mean it will probably be aliens from Area 51, but at least it will be easier to show you guys why you are wrong when you don't go changing your stories every 10 minutes.[/QUOTE]

No... the stories have changed only becase of missing information... the more solid information that's come out the more streamline the serious 9-11 'investigators' story became, it's now to the point where those defending the official version flatly refuse to debate anyone on the evidence unless it's in a very controlled setting.

What you see alot when people try to 'debunk' the truth is a combination of ad hom, and flip floping on explainations... fact id, the official version attempts to re-write physics, that alone should be suspet enough.
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

If all the information posted are verifiable facts, do you people at least think there is enough to warrant a new and independent investigation into the biggest criminal act and mass murder in American history?
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Solid proof the Pentagon got hit in the ONLY part of the building reinforced 9/11

I found this article in the archives of USA Today......

"Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach."

Here is the USA Todays link to the article from its archives.

USATODAY.com - Pentagon repairs to cost $700 million

Tom Leppert the CEO for Turner Construction which did many months of construction renovation work on the World Trade Center buildings up to the very day of 9/11 went on to be Mayor of Dallas Texas.

Then the CEO for Turner Construction which did many months of contruction renovations on the World Trade Center buildings now Mayor of Dallas Texas was appointed by George Bush to the President's Commission on White House Fellows.

There were many months of construction renovations done in the World Trade Center buildings before 9/11 and up to the very day of Sept 11, 2001.


Turner Construction Company performed clean-up at ground zero in which all the steel (evidence) got shipped to China.

Turner Construction had a main office located in the third sub-basement of Tower 1. Turner Construction had been performing construction renovation work in various parts throughout the WTC centers and had occupied various office spaces.

A WTC property assessment described some of the renovations as work upon steel support columns within and around elevator shafts of both WTC Towers.

Tom Leppert the CEO for Turner Construction which did all the construction renovation work on the World Trade Center buildings up to the very day of 9/11 went on to be Mayor of Dallas Texas.

Then the CEO for Turner Construction now Mayor of Dallas Texas was appointed by George Bush to the President's Commission on White House Fellows.

[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Leppert]Tom Leppert - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

Dallas News - Home, Sweet...Home? - page 1

Welcome to the City of Dallas, Texas - Office of the Mayor

White House Fellowships: Commission Members

In 1997 Turner Construction also constructed the new headquarters for the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) which manages a laboratory for energetics, explosive materials, propellents, etc and the only reliable source of aluminum nano-powders(thermite) in the United States.

http://manganaro.com/projbovt.html
 
Re: Article in "World Architecture News" and Bush Connected WTC construction renovati

Unless you have a way to prove that... do everyone a favor and stick to what can be proven...

The fact of the matter is that the damage done to the WTC buildings was definately consistent with being struck by planes. Not to mention... you know... the fact that everyone and their dog has seen footage of the planes hitting the buildings.

How are you going to say that trick photography was used when there were people independantly filming the event at the same time... let's not be rediculous here.

It's within the realm of possibility that the planes were actually remote controlled drones... BUT even if that's the case it's still planes that would have hit the buildings.

Who the hell is this 'dublin group'?? Did you... um... make it up? It's hard enough to get people to look at the honest evidence from 9-11 without having people go into unsustainable theories about 'no-planes' or 'nuclear devices'. Thee's enough real evidence to warrant an investigation, but going around telling people that the WTC wasn't even hit by planes is little better then counter-productive.

Thanks.

I never refuted drones, I never stated that the theory presented was sustainable, and rightly so with all of the half truths and nutbaggery that pervades the conspiracy realm. What I did refute was the mass media explaining the tragedy away just like the so called landing on the moon. The fact is they both never happened, or at least literally happened. It's all an illusion to sway the masses into the capitalist filter...Never about finding the truth to the lies of the mason juggernaut that seeks to own our minds with the nanno threat...
 
Back
Top Bottom