And again, what you assert they meant is at odds with what THEY say it meant.
How about you quote just ONE of the framers who says they meant what you suppose.
Umm, Jefferson had nothing to do with the writing of the Constitution.
How is this relevant to the discussion? Legislators of all stripes have passed unconstitutional laws.
It's the tea partiers who claim judicial review is "extra constitutional". Nobody else. Certainly not progressives.
So get back on the topic.
Can you back up this assertion?
Pssst: Jefferson didn't write the constitution. He wrote the Declaration of Independence. He was in France when Madison wrote the Constitution. Try a new meme!
Can you back up this assertion?
Yes, but I don't have the time. You're going to have to do your own research on that. Life is too short to educate conservatives on what they espouse.
Psst, hint: "framers" doesn't equal "author". Madison did most of the actual writing. It was a result of the discussion the FRAMERS held over the course of the preceding events.
Psst, hint: "framers" doesn't equal "author". Madison did most of the actual writing. It was a result of the discussion the FRAMERS held over the course of the preceding events.
Here's a list for you
Actually, he's wrong. The proper term is "wingnut"
Clever dodge, make an insane assertion and then say that others must do your legwork to back it up. I don't have the time, or the inclination, to play your silly games.
Psst, hint: framers don't have any authority to interpet the constitution
Actually, he's wrong. The proper term is "wingnut"
Was it not the "wingnuts" that said that PPACA would be struct down by judicial review?
Neither of you can do it can you? You can't show support for your view of the intent of Art III with quotes from ANY of the people who were there at that time participating in the formation of that document.
Neither of you can do it can you? You can't show support for your view of the intent of Art III with quotes from ANY of the people who were there at that time participating in the formation of that document.
Desperation takes hold.
Meanwhile, citing Jefferson as an expert of Art III, out of context, pretty much sums up why nobody takes conservative seriously.
Pssst: who's arguing that judicial review is extraconstitutional on this thread. Ask them if they're tea partiers.
Why do I have to assist conservatives in finding out what they actually believe?
NEXT!
The black letter of Art III. Marbury v. Madison. All case law since.
NEXT!
The black letter of Art III. Marbury v. Madison. All case law since.
NEXT!
Earth to cat head; it was TP folks and "wingnuts" that asserted that the SCOTUS, via judical review, would strike down the PPACA law, thus that proved that they, in fact, believed in it. :doh
not sure I understand the question, but it seems that the very same wingnuts who do not believe in judicial review were the ones who were hoping that judicial review would strike it down
Okay, then again, rather than repeating the same debunked position, show us the money. Give us a quote from ANY of the founders, the framers, heck, the signatores that comports with your position.
Nope, show me the post number of the quote you provided.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?