And your problem is that you are assuming that I am saying that no lockdowns are better than lockdowns.
I don't care about that.
Lockdowns are against the Constitution.
Plus, there was lots of data to indicate that had they gone on longer?
That they might have ended up killing FAR more people than they could possibly have 'saved'.
Plus the global depression they caused.
Plus all the extra, domestic violence victims and suicides.
That means they were VERY wrong.
Now, with all of that?
The ONLY way they are even remotely tolerable is if there is 100% proof that they were effective.
But no such proof exists.
So...that sews it.
The lockdowns were a mistake.
They caused GIGANTIC hardship and caused many deaths.
Yet there is NO unbiased, factual proof that they saved as many lives as they 'took'.
That is my point.