- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If you think the SCOTUS is so damn great then go learn some Latin.
You think those nuts sound so sophisticated when the talk their junk in Latin? Most of the time what they're saying in Latin translates into stupid **** like: "A man dropped a rock on my foot therefore I can drop a turtle on his head" and they use that nonsense as a formal analogy.
We let massive idiots control this country.
None of those laws define a fetus as a person, nor do they address the issue of abortion
They define the act of killing an unborn person as homicide, obviously that was overridden, in the narrow case defined by the Roe v. Wade SCOTUS decision, in the case of an authorized abortion. Homicide is strictly the killing of a person, not relieving a potential mother of a burdensome tissue mass.
Homicide is the killing of another human, not the killing of a person
Article 125 - Penal Law - Homicide, Abortion and Related Offenses
Furthermore, the laws you cite may define the word person (as used in the law you cited) to include the unborn. However, that doesn't change the meaning of the word "person" as used in the constitution
Very weak argument if you must resort to legal (dictionary?) hairsplitting over human vs. person.
hu·man
Adjective - Of, relating to, or characteristic of people or human beings.
Noun - A human being, esp. a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien.
Synonyms - 1) adjective. humane 2) noun. man - person - human being - individual - soul - mortal
===============================================================================
per.son
Noun
1. A human being regarded as an individual.
2. Used in legal or formal contexts to refer to an unspecified individual.
Synonyms man - individual - personage - character - figure
You have gotten answers to every question you asked, but you are unable to answer my one question:
Where does the constitution say that the govt has the power to ban or regulate abortion?
No one owns you. You are the property of no one and no thing.
are you delusional?
WHERE have i made such a statement?
i have stated over and over to you, i have not stated any such thing.......yet you resist, as if you trying to prove a point, which cannot be proven.
please, stop asking me a question, for a statement WHICH I HAVE NOT MADE.
you own yourself.....but i guess thats hard for you to understand.
Dude libertarians can't be pro-choice. That violates the basic principals of being a libertarian - the right to life - the right to individualism.
As far as I'm concerned abortion should be treated as murder.
Government shouldn't be legalizing or endorsing murder, however they are with death panels and abortion.
No, it's just impossible for you to prove. All you can do is repeat your delusional beliefs
Again, I havent said that ever stated such thing. I asked you a question about something you have not stated - just as you have done dozens of times in this thread.
And since you continue to ask questions about things no one has stated, I will continue to ask you questions about things that you never made any statements about
Where does the constitution say that the govt has the power to ban or regulate abortion?
tell my should i have to provide proof......
your the one stating the IMPOSSIBLE.
There is no need to prove any of your inane claims
case in point
since you want to ask me that question directly, i will answer.......... it does not say it can ban abortion, however as i did state already once!..........it is in post #517 after you posed the question to me.
governments primary duty is to protect rights.............again its is its primary duty........life is a right.
should government be protecting all human life yes!............is the unborn a human life?.........that is the debate the dividing line of the-----> whole question at hand.
you believe it is not life, i and many others do.....
so it comes down to does a women control her own body, and make her own CHOICES of what she will do with it, OR............ does the state have the power to prevent the killing of the unborn, AND FULFILL ITS PRIMARY DUTY?
since you want to ask me that question directly, i will answer.......... it does not say it can ban abortion, however as i did state already once!..........it is in post #517 after you posed the question to me.
governments primary duty is to protect rights.............again its is its primary duty........life is a right.
should government be protecting all human life yes!............is the unborn a human life?.........that is the debate the dividing line of the-----> whole question at hand.
you believe it is not life, i and many others do.....
so it comes down to does a women control her own body, and make her own CHOICES of what she will do with it, OR............ does the state have the power to prevent the killing of the unborn, AND FULFILL ITS PRIMARY DUTY?
So you advocate a barefaced Big Brother government, wow..............................
no, i question is the government fulfilling its role, by doing its delegated duty under the BOR.
their are those saying it is, and those saying it is not..i am on the side of NOT.
government doing its delegated duties is not big brother..........big brother is going outside its delegated duties, which there are 18 only ...and instituting things like welfare, education, housing, to name a few.
no, i question is the government fulfilling its role, by doing its delegated duty under the BOR.
their are those saying it is, and those saying it is not..i am on the side of NOT.
government doing its delegated duties is not big brother..........big brother is going outside its delegated duties, which there are 18 only ...and instituting things like welfare, education, housing, to name a few.
Where does th constitution say that the govt has a duty to protect all human life? Name one place where the constitution refers to "human life"?
The SCOTUS isn't in a position to be making those judgments either. They're lawyers not God.
To make matters even worse the Fourteenth Amendment completely contradicts everything the SCOTUS spews on just about every ruling.
really, so your staying government has no duty to protect life.................you must be in favor of the power of the President to kill people then.
the duty of the government is to secure the rights of the people, ....do you not have a right to live................or can anyone treat you like garage , and just kill you without any crime happening.
if you don't understand the basics, of america government..........grab a book and read..........because the right to life, is a basic concept.
and you have made me very sad, .......for posing that question.....
It's blatantly illegal....
How can a congress pass a law, the president signs it and then it's overturned by a bunch of arbitrators?
Why bother even having a president?
Why not just have a "spokesman" and then let the SCOTUS be the final judge when it comes to legislation - all 9 of them. Let 9 people dictate the US...
The SCOTUS violates the democratic republic process in so many ways it makes the founding principals of this nation a joke to what it is supposed to be.
The government enforcing the wishes of Jesus Christ IS Big Brother.............................
If you think the SCOTUS is so damn great then go learn some Latin.
You think those nuts sound so sophisticated when the talk their junk in Latin? Most of the time what they're saying in Latin translates into stupid **** like: "A man dropped a rock on my foot therefore I can drop a turtle on his head" and they use that nonsense as a formal analogy.
We let massive idiots control this country.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?