Irrelevant, the war was passed by congress, which makes it legal and constitutionaln under the war powers provision of the document, and that falls under defense, which is mandated spending. UHC fails under the tenth amendment of the constitution so all discussion might as well end about it until an amendment is passed.
I'll give you a clue, you're wrong, you are wrong if you add up the aggregates of both, year to year, and even an aggregate of the Iraq war versus any year of the proposed health plan. Don't believe me? Fine, the numbers are everywhere, including the CBO. One more thing, UHC is unconstitutional above the cost, so you fail on all counts.
Congress passes budgets, presidents sign them, so the Republicans with executive approval passed that from 1994-about 1999, before Bush was elected AND correctly done. Please learn civics before you randomly spew out talking points.
Spoken like a truly uninformed elitist. I'll tell you right now most of this post is forgetable for it's lack of correctness. You failed on comparative cost, you've failed on protocol, and you've failed to get your point across, so your only weapon left is blank condecension.