• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are You Tired Of Obama's Mealymouth?

Aren't You Tired Of Obama's Lies?

  • Nope! I love him...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Good God, YES!

    Votes: 20 51.3%

  • I'm cynical as hell, there all the same...

    Votes: 19 48.7%
  • Total voters
    39

ChezC3

Relentless Thinking Fury
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
12,228
Reaction score
4,459
Location
The North Shore
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Last edited:
I chose the third.
 
A good chunk of this list are simply assertions. I expected a higher degree of journalistic professionalism from Dan from Squirrel Hill.
 
a351 said:
A good chunk of this list are simply assertions. I expected a higher degree of journalistic professionalism from Dan from Squirrel Hill.
Click to expand...

Each "assertion" has a link.
 
ChezC3 said:
Each "assertion" has a link.
Click to expand...
Not really, no. Simply labeling programs that Dan from Squirrel Hill finds unsavory as unconstitutional is an assertion. So is claiming that Obama's belief in public education was a "lie" due to the fact that he sent his children to private schools. That's in the first fraction of the list alone. Something tells me it doesn't get much better.
 

That 'something' telling you is probably a psychological aversion to facts.
 
Yes they are all the same but yes I've been tired of his blathering.
 

Did I say anything about constitutionality? If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one? Did you miss the links? If not than how is it "No, not really"?

Something tells me for you, the sun rises and sets on Obama's ass...

Why else the scatter shot misrepresentations in an effort to rebuke?
 

You seriously think that constitutes a lie? Wow.

So, every single Republican who happens to not own a gun is a liar!
 
ChezC3 said:
Did I say anything about constitutionality?
Click to expand...

Dan from Squirrel Hill did. He simply proclaimed multiple programs extended under Obama to be unconstitutional. That's an opinion. No links to back up said opinion with either, as you claimed earlier. Something tells me you're betting on the wrong horse.

If Obama "believed" in public schools why wouldn't he send his girls to one?
Click to expand...

Security? Location? In either event, one doesn't need to send their children to a public school in order to believe in the ideal and access to public education for others.
 
If women "believed" that abortions should be legal, why don't they all get one? If people believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry, then why doesn't every supporter marry someone of the same sex?
 
Deuce said:
You seriously think that constitutes a lie? Wow.

So, every single Republican who happens to not own a gun is a liar!
Click to expand...

D-I-S-I-N-G-E-N-U-O-U-S

You know, kinda like what you're being right now?
 
Robbie Loucks said:
If women "believed" that abortions should be legal, why don't they all get one? If people believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry, then why doesn't every supporter marry someone of the same sex?
Click to expand...

Oh my...:slapme:
 
I'm just tired of Obama. Lets have an election already.
 
Obama is a serial liar and, along with Eric Holder, is one of the most corrupt politicians in American history. Every time I see him on TV I change the channel. He's pathetic.
 


Then why did you ascribe it to me? I didn't know that a link has to be provided for common knowledge, or are you skeptical that Obama's girls are in fact attending a private school?

I've been picking winners for years...

Security? Location? In either event, one doesn't need to send their children to a public school in order to believe in the ideal and access to public education for others.
Click to expand...

Security? From whom? The little lasses didn't just start in a private school once daddy became Pres. Do all parents not deserve to know that their children are secure? Location? I'm pretty sure the Obama's have enough coin to move to whichever school district they choose.


What's further, I wasn't aware that public education was imperil? Last I checked it was compulsory. The fact that you took this particular point, a point in which all politicians glad hand shows your own disingenuous proclivity. Is there a politician calling for keeping kids from being eduataded?

Two peas in a pod you and Obama be...
 
I'm certainly fed-up with whiny rightists complaining about elections they can't win.
Even with your new-age voter suppression, all it does is piss off DEMs to get out the vote better.
Either way, you're ****ed.
Enjoy the SOTU in 6 nights .
 
ChezC3 said:
I didn't know that a link has to be provided for common knowledge,
or are you skeptical that Obama's girls are in fact attending a private school?
Click to expand...
Don't christie's kids also attend private schools, not the public ones Christie is ****king.
And Chrissie was sure a smart-ass punk when confronted, wasn't he?
Mr. Obama cannot speak this way, or he would be the "angry black man", wouldn't he .
 
NIMBY said:
Don't christie's kids also attend private schools, not the public ones Christie is ****king.
And Chrissie was sure a smart-ass punk when confronted, wasn't he?
Mr. Obama cannot speak this way, or he would be the "angry black man", wouldn't he .
Click to expand...

I'm sure, I've never liked Christie from day one, a fat guy with a loud mouth, oh my, never seen one of those before....never understood the infatuation.

He's a POS same as the current POTUS...
 
ChezC3 said:
Oh my...:slapme:
Click to expand...
What? I'm just showing that his argument isn't sound. Obama believes in public education and that it can be good, but that doesn't imply that he prefers it over all other forms of education.
 
Robbie Loucks said:
What? I'm just showing that his argument isn't sound. Obama believes in public education and that it can be good, but that doesn't imply that he prefers it over all other forms of education.
Click to expand...

How do you believe in public education? Again, the premise itself is laughable, it's compulsory, you don't need to believe in it. There's no legitimate chance of it vanishing, no politician with the hopes of being elected to the highest office of the land is going to come out and say "I don't believe in education for all, I don't believe everyone should get an opportunity, and you know, since it was the Catholic church who we modeled our public school system on, that's a clear violation of church and state anyhow, so you know we just got to up and end this once and for all!"

Like I told the other one, arguing this is a demonstration of shared disingenuity.
 
ChezC3 said:
How do you believe in public education? Again, the premise itself is laughable, it's compulsory, you don't need to believe in it. There's no legitimate chance of it vanishing.
Click to expand...
That's not what I meant, to believe in public education means that you believe that it can provide satisfactory results. Use your context clues.
 

I believe that Bud is perfectly good beer.

I prefer to drink other beers.
 
Robbie Loucks said:
That's not what I meant, to believe in public education means that you believe that it can provide satisfactory results. Use your context clues.
Click to expand...

I'm in context. If it can provide satisfactory results than you're saying that Obama is willingly and happily being fleeced. For if the result would be satisfactory in a public setting there would be no reason to pay an outrageous price tag on a private one.

I'm not sure what you're about, but if you get satisfaction from Product A and product A costs a couple hundred bucks but you choose to go with product B, which also provides satisfactory results but comes at a, oh, I don't know, just say, $30,000 a year price tag(I'm sure I'm low balling) would you be willing to call yourself a fool for going with product B when you'll get the same satisfactory results from product A at a sliver of the cost?

No, you wouldn't, and don't say that you would. As I said. the premise is laughable and it is one which is contradictory to the entire kumbya my lord liberal we're all in the same gang love fest which you yourself claim membership to.
 
Last edited:
sangha said:
I believe that Bud is perfectly good beer.

I prefer to drink other beers.
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is that Obama prefers to get the same results and pay at a premium, for what? Economic Stimulus?

Come now...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…