• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Are you concerned about where the loyalty is of Muslems serving in the Military?

re you concerned about where the loyalty is of Muslems serving in the Military?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 17.6%
  • No

    Votes: 28 82.4%

  • Total voters
    34
Jews have lived in Iran, and Christians have lived in Iraq, for many centuries.

Apparently those countries have been led by moderate Muslims who were not and are not not following their religion. Either you and the terrorists are twisting the Koran, or maybe the religious leaders of Iraq and Iran over the centuries just never bothered to read it.

This is my key question: Either moderate Muslims are not practicing and not doing what their religion tells them to do or the terrorists are twisting their religion and taking quotes from the Koran out of context. Those violent quotes from the Koran need to be explained. Do you agree?
 
NP you misunderstand my use of the Jewish people here. I used that number just as a comparison to the number of Muslims in America. It is about the same as Jews. I used the comparison so one can get a better perspective on the numbers, not the religions. So the frequency with which you meet a Jewish person is about the same as Muslims.

Of course they are not flying planes into buildings but as someone else said neither are American Muslims. Besides like my friend (who is Jewish) who does my income tax said "Have you ever heard of an accountant, a lawyer or a doctor flying a plane into a building?"

The only comparison you can make about the 911 hijackers would be with Israelis, who have, at times, killed Americans.


Yes but they are killing their superiors and giving away top secret information....We caught 2, the question is how many more are there?
 
In response to this, and in deference to the fact that no one has responded to my statement/question in post #152, I will repost it for all of your kind attention:



Any takers?

I have very mixed emotions about Muslim in the military becasue I can honestly say I don't know where all there loyalties are......Is it to Islam or is it to the USA.....If all you were honest you would question it too.......We have caught 2 traitors but how many are in cells in our military that have not been caught.......I just wish that more muslims would be vocal about their support of the USA.......
 
I have very mixed emotions about Muslim in the military becasue I can honestly say I don't know where all there loyalties are......Is it to Islam or is it to the USA.....If all you were honest you would question it too.......We have caught 2 traitors but how many are in cells in our military that have not been caught.......I just wish that more muslims would be vocal about their support of the USA.......

It's pretty clear where you stand.

Conserv.pat15 said:
I voted yes. I would not be able to trust a Muslim in the military. "Moderate Muslims" do nothing about stopping terrorism

NP said:
Amen my friend Amen and I believe the 8 people that voted no if they were really honest would vote the same way.......

NP said:
They may have a completely different reason for joining like the Sgt did......He wanted to meet his 72 virgins.........

NP said:
All these Libs not concerned with moslems in the military, of course none of them are in and most never have been....No skin off their ***........

I have 5 members of my own family in the military. I am concerned however I unlike you don't see it the same way. Without even providing one report claiming these men killed in the name of Islam you've managed to spark a debate where the weakness of your argument for being so afraid of Muslims has been shown. You jump whenever somebody blames the entire military for the actions of a few rogues but have no problem condemning and hating an entire religion for the actions of religious extremists. It seem highly hypocritical of you. Don't you think?
 
It's pretty clear where you stand.
I have 5 members of my own family in the military. I am concerned however I unlike you don't see it the same way. Without even providing one report claiming these men killed in the name of Islam you've managed to spark a debate where the weakness of your argument for being so afraid of Muslims has been shown. You jump whenever somebody blames the entire military for the actions of a few rogues but have no problem condemning and hating an entire religion for the actions of religious extremists. It seem highly hypocritical of you. Don't you think?

Military officials for the most part did not believe his religious beliefs had anything to do with the attack. Conservative journalists tended to attribute his actions to a supposed allegiance to extremist Islam; liberal journalists tended to propose that Akbar had simply snapped from the stress of constant racial and religious harassment.

Akbar's mother, Quran Bilal, did tell reporters that she believed intolerance for his race and his Muslim faith created tensions within his unit as it prepared to invade a Muslim country.[2] Akbar's father has said that his son was the only African American and only Muslim in his company, the other members of which subjected him to constant harassment.[3]

Akbar himself reportedly said, just moments after his arrest, "You guys are coming into our countries, and you're going to rape our women and kill our children."[3]
Hasan Akbar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Like I said before, in this case, it is questionable what this Muslim soldier's motive was.

Former U.S. Navy sailor arrested on terror charges - CNN.com

This one is the Muslim in the Navy.
 
Military officials for the most part did not believe his religious beliefs had anything to do with the attack. Conservative journalists tended to attribute his actions to a supposed allegiance to extremist Islam; liberal journalists tended to propose that Akbar had simply snapped from the stress of constant racial and religious harassment.

Akbar's mother, Quran Bilal, did tell reporters that she believed intolerance for his race and his Muslim faith created tensions within his unit as it prepared to invade a Muslim country.[2] Akbar's father has said that his son was the only African American and only Muslim in his company, the other members of which subjected him to constant harassment.[3]

Akbar himself reportedly said, just moments after his arrest, "You guys are coming into our countries, and you're going to rape our women and kill our children."[3]
Hasan Akbar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Like I said before, in this case, it is questionable what this Muslim soldier's motive was.

Former U.S. Navy sailor arrested on terror charges - CNN.com

This one is the Muslim in the Navy.

So it's basically....1 unknown...1 we know for sure...out of....1.4 million in active duty? 4 million including the reserves? At this rate our entire military will be completely whiped out in around 7,000,000 years.
 
Originally Posted by Iriemon
Jews have lived in Iran, and Christians have lived in Iraq, for many centuries.

Apparently those countries have been led by moderate Muslims who were not and are not not following their religion. Either you and the terrorists are twisting the Koran, or maybe the religious leaders of Iraq and Iran over the centuries just never bothered to read it.

This is my key question: Either moderate Muslims are not practicing and not doing what their religion tells them to do or the terrorists are twisting their religion and taking quotes from the Koran out of context. Those violent quotes from the Koran need to be explained. Do you agree?

Explained to whom? The fact that Muslims have lived with Christians and Jews for centuries means that your and the terrorists' reading of the Koran that it mandates killing infidels is incorrect, or only followed by terrorists and those who want to make war against Islam. The vast majority of Muslims interpret the Koran differently, they take the passages to which you refer and take them in context with related passages, read them in context to the teaching of the Koran as a whole, or just ignore them. Otherwise, the "infidels" living in Iraq and Iran would have been slaughtered centruries ago.

In fact, there are many parts of the Koran that suggest that Christians and Jews should not be killed:

[2.62] Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve.

[5.69] Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah and the last day and does good-- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve.

[5.82] Certainly you will find the most violent of people in enmity for those who believe (to be) the Jews and those who are polytheists, and you will certainly find the nearest in friendship to those who believe (to be) those who say: We are Christians; this is because there are priests and monks among them and because they do not behave proudly.

There are other verses that talk about the differences in belief and that there beliefs are wrong, but I searched the Koran, and I didn't *any* passages that instruct Muslims to kill Jews and Christians.

These passages certainly don't suggest to mean that Muslims are instructed to go out and kill Christians and Jews. What you and the terrorists are doing is taking selected text out of context, and ignoring the rest of the Koran in deciding your interpretation is the correct one.

You can do the exact same thing with the Judeo-Christian Bible. Just some snipets from the OT:

Exodus 21:18 "Do not allow a sorceress to live.

Exodus 21:20 "Whoever sacrifices to any god other than the LORD must be destroyed.

Lev 20:1 'Any Israelite or any alien living in Israel who gives [a] any of his children to Molech must be put to death. The people of the community are to stone him.

Lev 20:27 'A man or woman who is a medium or spiritist among you must be put to death. You are to stone them; their blood will be on their own heads.' "

Lev 24:13 "Take the blasphemer outside the camp. All those who heard him are to lay their hands on his head, and the entire assembly is to stone him. 15 Say to the Israelites: 'If anyone curses his God, he will be held responsible; 16 anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.


Does those violent quotes from the Bible need to be explained? Does this text mean that moderate Christians and Jews "are not doing what their religion tells them to do?"

You argue that the Koran mandates Muslims to kill infidels. But very few Muslims agree with your interpretation, just as very few Jews or Christians think we should be going around putting to death anyone who blasphemes the name of the Lord, is a medium, or sacrifices to another God.

Now some extremists takes these writings and justify their acts in the name of their religion. And in times throughout history, particularly when they felt threatened, Christians did the exact same thing. I don't think I even need to identify some of the many examples of this, unless you deny it.

It is true that at this time in history, there is a small faction of Muslims that have turned to extreme interpretations. This is one thing I agree with GySgt with -- that is a result of conditions that reflect problems in their cultures, and the fact that they feel threatened by external forces. And when the great Christian power, the US, closely allies itself with Israel and attacks and invades their holy lands without justification, more Muslims are motivated to follow this extreme view.

But really, what I find most ironic, is that the two groups that promote this extremist interpretation are the terrorists, and folks here like you that want to inflame hatred and warfare against their religion. The irony is that you criticize those Muslims who read the Koran as a means for violence, but you are doing the exact same thing as a means to promote violence against Islam.
 
Are you concerned about where the loyalty is of Christians serving in the Military?

There has been at least one incident of Moslems in the Military turning their guns on their comrades and superiors.

In addition recently a Moslem in the Navy was brought up on charges for divulging classified information.....

So I ask the question....

Please explain your choice.......

There has been at least one thousand incidents of Christians in the Military turning their guns on their comrades and superiors.

In addition recently a Christian in the Navy was brought up on charges for divulging classified information.....

So I ask the question....

Please explain your choice.........


Duke
 
Yes but they are killing their superiors and giving away top secret information....We caught 2, the question is how many more are there?

I know from previous experience that it is a waste of time to ask you to back up your assertions with citation to a source, but given your history of repeatedly making up facts to argue stuff, I wonder if you could let us know a source for your claim. I did a quick internet search and didn't find anything about a muslim soldier killing his superior.
 
So it's basically....1 unknown...1 we know for sure...out of....1.4 million in active duty? 4 million including the reserves? At this rate our entire military will be completely whiped out in around 7,000,000 years.

How many of the 1.4 million are Muslims? Also, there are more factors than just the actions of these two soldiers.
 
Explained to whom? The fact that Muslims have lived with Christians and Jews for centuries means that your and the terrorists' reading of the Koran that it mandates killing infidels is incorrect, or only followed by terrorists and those who want to make war against Islam. The vast majority of Muslims interpret the Koran differently, they take the passages to which you refer and take them in context with related passages, read them in context to the teaching of the Koran as a whole, or just ignore them. Otherwise, the "infidels" living in Iraq and Iran would have been slaughtered centruries ago.

In fact, there are many parts of the Koran that suggest that Christians and Jews should not be killed:

[2.62] Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve.

[5.69] Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah and the last day and does good-- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve.

[5.82] Certainly you will find the most violent of people in enmity for those who believe (to be) the Jews and those who are polytheists, and you will certainly find the nearest in friendship to those who believe (to be) those who say: We are Christians; this is because there are priests and monks among them and because they do not behave proudly.

There are other verses that talk about the differences in belief and that there beliefs are wrong, but I searched the Koran, and I didn't *any* passages that instruct Muslims to kill Jews and Christians.

These passages certainly don't suggest to mean that Muslims are instructed to go out and kill Christians and Jews. What you and the terrorists are doing is taking selected text out of context, and ignoring the rest of the Koran in deciding your interpretation is the correct one.

You can do the exact same thing with the Judeo-Christian Bible. Just some snipets from the OT:

Exodus 21:18 "Do not allow a sorceress to live.

Exodus 21:20 "Whoever sacrifices to any god other than the LORD must be destroyed.

Lev 20:1 'Any Israelite or any alien living in Israel who gives [a] any of his children to Molech must be put to death. The people of the community are to stone him.

Lev 20:27 'A man or woman who is a medium or spiritist among you must be put to death. You are to stone them; their blood will be on their own heads.' "

Lev 24:13 "Take the blasphemer outside the camp. All those who heard him are to lay their hands on his head, and the entire assembly is to stone him. 15 Say to the Israelites: 'If anyone curses his God, he will be held responsible; 16 anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.


Does those violent quotes from the Bible need to be explained? Does this text mean that moderate Christians and Jews "are not doing what their religion tells them to do?"

You argue that the Koran mandates Muslims to kill infidels. But very few Muslims agree with your interpretation, just as very few Jews or Christians think we should be going around putting to death anyone who blasphemes the name of the Lord, is a medium, or sacrifices to another God.

Now some extremists takes these writings and justify their acts in the name of their religion. And in times throughout history, particularly when they felt threatened, Christians did the exact same thing. I don't think I even need to identify some of the many examples of this, unless you deny it.

It is true that at this time in history, there is a small faction of Muslims that have turned to extreme interpretations. This is one thing I agree with GySgt with -- that is a result of conditions that reflect problems in their cultures, and the fact that they feel threatened by external forces. And when the great Christian power, the US, closely allies itself with Israel and attacks and invades their holy lands without justification, more Muslims are motivated to follow this extreme view.

But really, what I find most ironic, is that the two groups that promote this extremist interpretation are the terrorists, and folks here like you that want to inflame hatred and warfare against their religion. The irony is that you criticize those Muslims who read the Koran as a means for violence, but you are doing the exact same thing as a means to promote violence against Islam.

You did not address the violent quotes from the Koran.
 
I know from previous experience that it is a waste of time to ask you to back up your assertions with citation to a source, but given your history of repeatedly making up facts to argue stuff, I wonder if you could let us know a source for your claim. I did a quick internet search and didn't find anything about a muslim soldier killing his superior.

I posted the sources.
 
You did not address the violent quotes from the Koran.

I did:

"The vast majority of Muslims interpret the Koran differently, they take the passages to which you refer and take them in context with related passages, read them in context to the teaching of the Koran as a whole, or just ignore them."

Beyond that I'm not an expert in the Koran.

You didn't address the violent quotes from the Bible.
 
It's pretty clear where you stand.









I have 5 members of my own family in the military. I am concerned however I unlike you don't see it the same way. Without even providing one report claiming these men killed in the name of Islam you've managed to spark a debate where the weakness of your argument for being so afraid of Muslims has been shown. You jump whenever somebody blames the entire military for the actions of a few rogues but have no problem condemning and hating an entire religion for the actions of religious extremists. It seem highly hypocritical of you. Don't you think?

1. You have no clue where I stand......

2. I don't care if you have 100 people from you family in the military........I am debating with you not them......
 
But really, what I find most ironic, is that the two groups that promote this extremist interpretation are the terrorists, and folks here like you that want to inflame hatred and warfare against their religion. The irony is that you criticize those Muslims who read the Koran as a means for violence, but you are doing the exact same thing as a means to promote violence against Islam.
Great post! Very well done!

I suppose you already realize that when dealing with bigotry the use of logic does not usually sway the bigot. If they were reasonable and rationale they would not be a bigot/racist to begin with.

For the record I am Jewish so in theory I have many, many reasons to Muslims. In reality I know that people are people and that the actions of a few do not speak for the masses.

At the end of the day we all love, we all care about our families, we all want to live a peaceful life regardless of what religion we adopt.
 
Re: Are you concerned about where the loyalty is of Christians serving in the Militar

There has been at least one thousand incidents of Christians in the Military turning their guns on their comrades and superiors.

In addition recently a Christian in the Navy was brought up on charges for divulging classified information.....

So I ask the question....

Please explain your choice.........


Duke

First provide a link for that lie............
 
I know from previous experience that it is a waste of time to ask you to back up your assertions with citation to a source, but given your history of repeatedly making up facts to argue stuff, I wonder if you could let us know a source for your claim. I did a quick internet search and didn't find anything about a muslim soldier killing his superior.

Go back and read the whole thread for once in your life........I posted the link..Try abd keep up..........:roll:
 
I did:

"The vast majority of Muslims interpret the Koran differently, they take the passages to which you refer and take them in context with related passages, read them in context to the teaching of the Koran as a whole, or just ignore them."

Beyond that I'm not an expert in the Koran.

You posted non-violent quotes from the Koran and violent quotes from the bible. I did not ask about those.

You didn't address the violent quotes from the Bible.

Where does Jesus teach violence?
 
26 X World Champs;513219[B said:
]Great post! Very well done[/B]!

I suppose you already realize that when dealing with bigotry the use of logic does not usually sway the bigot. If they were reasonable and rationale they would not be a bigot/racist to begin with.

For the record I am Jewish so in theory I have many, many reasons to Muslims. In reality I know that people are people and that the actions of a few do not speak for the masses.

At the end of the day we all love, we all care about our families, we all want to live a peaceful life regardless of what religion we adopt.

Get a frigging room for your love fest.........
 
Yes but they are killing their superiors and giving away top secret information....We caught 2, the question is how many more are there?

We caught two in four years. There is no denying that it is a fact. They have been the subjects of justice and are now paying for their crimes. One must always be on guard for spies and traitors in times of conflict. We have no argument there BUT... the number is two and the measure you infer are very, very strict. I am not ready to subject a portion any portion of American society to authoritarian laws that are different than those that apply to everyone as you are inferring over the course of this discussion

But the number 2... how many people were caught giving information to the Germans during WWII? Way more than 2. Yest we did not keep German- Americans from serving in the military or any of the things suggested here that we do to Muslims. Many many recipients of the CMoH were of German descent. Also i don't deny that suspicious German-Americans were watched in some cases. And remember that the Germans establish overt demonstrations by the Nazi bund all over America. That I know of there have been no demonstrations of similar kind, exalting Al-Queda or Hamas here on American soil. I don't look at your assessment of the situation as necessarily racist but it is certainly extreme you must admit. It is the same mental outlook that caused us to panic in WWII and intern Japanese -Americans, German-Americans and Italian-Americans.
 
Back
Top Bottom