Anarchist100
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
- Messages
- 414
- Reaction score
- 42
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
Anarchy. Right. Back to a state of innocence, a Garden of Eden.couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
Just you.I doubt anyone knows what anarchy means.
Me? I would have to google it.Just you.
I do not support anarchist philosophy in the sense that i would want it to become a reality. Mainly because it just would not work in the present state of the world. Anarchism is more a philosophical ideal rather than a politics to support.couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
When there is political chaos, it is the poor, working class, and ordinary people who pay the price and the thugs take over.I have been called an anarchist. I enjoy the political chaos happening and hope for the government to lose a lot of power and confidence. I don't actually want us to be ungoverned savages with no rule of law, though.
There’s a few self-described libertarians on here. Most of them appear to be rabid Trumpists though.couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
Many people believe that they are questioning things when really they are questioning what they have been raised to oppose: Democrats and republicans.Anarchy. Right. Back to a state of innocence, a Garden of Eden.
You can find people who agree with damn near anything you propose to them. I'm sure you'll find an anarchist or two here.
Assuming you are an anarchist, what is your goal? What is it you want?couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
Depends how you define anarchist.couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
Anarchy could only work if everyone respected each other's rights/work/property, and there is zero chance in hell of that.couldn't find any, mostly liberals or conservatives. (this is a joke question, but really are there?)
And there we have it. the common mistake nearly always made.Depends how you define anarchist.
Personally, I do not believe that anyone is really an anarchist.
Of course, I base that on Anarchists being utterly opposed to any form of government.
Yeah1 And one could say the same for capitalism.Anarchy could only work if everyone respected each other's rights/work/property, and there is zero chance in hell of that.
I prefer to think of minimalist government as minimalist government, and reserve the terms anarchy and anarchism to reference a lack of any government.And there we have it. the common mistake nearly always made.
You have just failed, as many do, to differentiate between anarchy and anarchism. The former is a simply a state of lack of government where as the latter is a philosophy of minimalist governance.
And this is why such a debate will be a waste of time on this board. Because most peoples understanding is no better or deeper than the worn out cliches they see on the back of a toilet door.
How will anarchy stop conglomerates from amassing monopoly power and abusing workers/consumers? Corporations will still exist even without the government, they just will lack government regulation....Yeah1 And one could say the same for capitalism.
Your assuming that capitalism will still exist.How will anarchy stop conglomerates from amassing monopoly power and abusing workers/consumers? Corporations will still exist even without the government, they just will lack government regulation....