- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Definitely!In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html
Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
Religious people are no more hypocrites than either the far left or far right. They all have a right to their views and to be heard without some nut case calling them hypocrites.
Religious people are no more hypocrites than either the far left or far right.
Evangelicals in the southern Bible Belt constitute a good portion of Trumps base.
How supposed devout Christians can support a sexual predator, adulterer, and habitual liar is beyond me.
Political agenda apparently trumps the Ten Commandments. (pun intended)
For supporting Trump, yes, I think so. But, Christians just vote for someone who they think is going to protect their interests. Same as anyone else.
I mean to break it down into a scorecard..
A vote for Trump is a -10 on the Christian morals card..
but, you also get Pence which might be a +12.
So, you come out with a +2 score on your Christian voter spread.
Everyone in this thread:
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html
Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html
Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html
Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
People are so quick to judge others without even thinking objectively about a situation. Those that defend' s Trump moral character, or blasted Clinton for his indiscretions but are silent on Trump are absolutely hypocrites. However, many that support Trump do so despite his lack of morals or intelligence because he supports their policies.
To put this into perspective, currently we have the #metoo movement going on about sexual harassment and men in positions of power who used their positions for sex. Does anyone believe Democrats outraged over people like Weinstein would support Pence over a JFK or Bill Clinton? No, and it would be rather ridiculous of them to do so because they likely don't support most of the policies he would run on.
a never-ending game of I'm-more-conservative-than-the-next-guy
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html
Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
Yeah, conservatives tend to hold the party line, stronger than Dems do though. If the Dem candidate was a rapist, I contend more Dems would abstain from voting for the rapist, than conservatives would if their candidate were in the same boat. Would they ever vote for the other side? Likely no. they would vote 3rd party or write in. Whereas more conservatives would go ahead and vote the rapist into office. Just guesswork on my part, not trying to get into a huge argument. Just because Conservatives hold the party line, because in my opinion, it is part of their attributes of their personality to conform, rather than rebel. Even if that means supporting a rapist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?