Arctic sea ice is going to grow. Says science...

[istodolez]

LOL...

You love your name-calling, with made-up words.

LOL...

Fringer.

It's called a neologism.

LOL...

Can you show me a dictionary definition please?

Grown ups can handle neologisms.

Are you referring to him as being a member pf a fringe?

Conspiracy theorists often are.

 

[watsup]

LOL...

You love your name-calling, with made-up words.

LOL...

Fringer.

LOL...

Can you show me a dictionary definition please?


Definition of fringer

1 : one that fringes or makes a fringe
2 : one who is a member of a fringe

Definition of FRINGER

one that fringes or makes a fringe; one who is a member of a fringe… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

So...

Are you referring to him as being a member pf a fringe?

You spend a lot of time parsing and very little actually discussing the prime factor in present global warming in CO2.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Gah. Not sure it's worthwhile opening one's mind to that kind of conspiracy.

You know who is driving "globalization" the most? The US Consumer and the US corporate executives. Yup. The two pillars of the FREEEEEEEEE MARKET. Why? Because it allows for a more vast network of exploitable resources (including cheap human labor).

If you want to get scared of someone...get scared of your fellow Americans.

It's called a neologism.



Grown ups can handle neologisms.



Conspiracy theorists often are.

Trying to actually become famous some how?

 

[istodolez]

Trying to actually become famous some how?

Wha...?

 

[watsup]

LOL...

You love your name-calling, with made-up words.

LOL...

Fringer.

LOL...

Can you show me a dictionary definition please?


Definition of fringer

1 : one that fringes or makes a fringe
2 : one who is a member of a fringe

Definition of FRINGER

one that fringes or makes a fringe; one who is a member of a fringe… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

So...

Are you referring to him as being a member pf a fringe?

I make up words all the time when called for. What exactly is your probllem?

 

[code1211]

People.

I know with absolute certainty that I do NOT have direct, indirect or any other kind of control at all over the climate.

Never had it. Never will.

Which people are you citing.

 

[code1211]

Again, you appear to be in disagreement with the majority of the earth's climate experts on the topic of "climate stability".

It must be lonely being the most knowledgable person fighting against all the experts.

You seem to be confusing politicians with scientists. Scientists state ideas in the form of Hypotheses and include the tests that may be used to falsify their hypotheses.

Politicians misdirect and confuse in their efforts to swindle folks out of money. At this point, the main effort of AGW is a political one.

The role played by science in "AGW Science" seems very similar to the role played by science in Astrology.

 

[code1211]

Psychological projection BIGTIME.

Not at all. If you would like to a link to something sensible, I'd love to see it.

 

[code1211]

Do some research and you will find that to be true.

What do you consider to be a cause of extinctions occurring today that has never occurred before?

As far as I know, extinctions have always occurred when friendly environments become hostile for the species that are becoming extinct.

Has this process changed?

 

[code1211]

I've heard all this clap trap about global centralized control now for decades. Every fringer out there loves this scare tactic. Most of the time they leverage some innocuous phrase in a UN paper to propose that the USA will soon be controlled by....FOREIGNERS!

Gah. Not sure it's worthwhile opening one's mind to that kind of conspiracy.

You know who is driving "globalization" the most? The US Consumer and the US corporate executives. Yup. The two pillars of the FREEEEEEEEE MARKET. Why? Because it allows for a more vast network of exploitable resources (including cheap human labor).

If you want to get scared of someone...get scared of your fellow Americans.

Are you asserting that a coordinated global effort involving the cooperation of every person on the planet can be organized without a coordinated global effort involving the cooperation of every person on the planet?

 

[istodolez]

I know with absolute certainty that I do NOT have direct, indirect or any other kind of control at all over the climate.

NOr did I say you did.

YOU DO however have control over your carbon footprint.

 

[istodolez]

You seem to be confusing politicians with scientists. Scientists state ideas in the form of Hypotheses and include the tests that may be used to falsify their hypotheses.

Politicians misdirect and confuse in their efforts to swindle folks out of money. At this point, the main effort of AGW is a political one.

The role played by science in "AGW Science" seems very similar to the role played by science in Astrology.

LOL.

I'm guessing the name "Roger Revelle" means nothing to you. But it should. He was an extremely important scientist who took the learnings up to the 1950's and alerted the government and the public that something might need to be done about all of this.

You should really learn the history of the topic before you try to draw cartoons about it.

 

[watsup]

You seem to be confusing politicians with scientists. Scientists state ideas in the form of Hypotheses and include the tests that may be used to falsify their hypotheses.

Politicians misdirect and confuse in their efforts to swindle folks out of money. At this point, the main effort of AGW is a political one.

The role played by science in "AGW Science" seems very similar to the role played by science in Astrology.

How so?

 

[watsup]

What do you consider to be a cause of extinctions occurring today that has never occurred before?

As far as I know, extinctions have always occurred when friendly environments become hostile for the species that are becoming extinct.

Has this process changed?

There is a mass extinction of thousands of species going on at present. How exactly have "friendly environments" become hostile for so many flora and fauna in the past few decades?

 

[watsup]

Are you asserting that a coordinated global effort involving the cooperation of every person on the planet can be organized without a coordinated global effort involving the cooperation of every person on the planet?
[/QUOTE

As many as possible, in spite of the scientific ignorancd and accompanying resistance of the denier cult.

 

[Threegoofs]

So you really don't know what the word "slump" means in a geomorphological sense?

I raised this topic to speak against your point about raising sea levels.

He’s an expert on this topic.

He just doesn’t use your fancy terminology.

Do you know he has THREE SCREENS to look up all this stuff?

 

[code1211]

NOr did I say you did.

YOU DO however have control over your carbon footprint.

Also over my wardrobe choices.

Neither one impact climate in a way that will allow me to control and direct the climate of the planet.

 

[code1211]

LOL.

I'm guessing the name "Roger Revelle" means nothing to you. But it should. He was an extremely important scientist who took the learnings up to the 1950's and alerted the government and the public that something might need to be done about all of this.

You should really learn the history of the topic before you try to draw cartoons about it.

During the 1950's? Before satellite technology?

Perhaps including a link to the alert he provided would be a good thing.

 

[code1211]

How so?

Scientists say that we are in the middle of a 2 degree variation of temperature that has been dominating the planet for 10,000.

Politicians shriek, "We must act now. We only have 12 years". They have been applying that expiration date for about 30 years now.

 

[code1211]

There is a mass extinction of thousands of species going on at present. How exactly have "friendly environments" become hostile for so many flora and fauna in the past few decades?

Crap happens. My first guess is that human civilization is spreading out into areas previously untouched.

There are about 6.5 BILLION more people today than there were in about 1880.

There were previous ELE's that knocked off huge percentages of species.

When friendly environments change, they change.

Are you trying to attach that to Climate Change?

 

[istodolez]

During the 1950's? Before satellite technology?

Perhaps including a link to the alert he provided would be a good thing.

Such shocking ignorance of the history of the topic. Shameful.

You should read more.

 

[istodolez]

When friendly environments change, they change.

Are you trying to attach that to Climate Change?

Did you really just type that?

 

[watsup]

Scientists say that we are in the middle of a 2 degree variation of temperature that has been dominating the planet for 10,000.

Politicians shriek, "We must act now. We only have 12 years". They have been applying that expiration date for about 30 years now.

No one is “shrieking” except you, as above. And why do they say that “we must act now”? Do you even know?

 

[watsup]

Crap happens. My first guess is that human civilization is spreading out into areas previously untouched.

There are about 6.5 BILLION more people today than there were in about 1880.

There were previous ELE's that knocked off huge percentages of species.

When friendly environments change, they change.

Are you trying to attach that to Climate Change?

Am I trying to attach what to climate change?

 

[code1211]

Such shocking ignorance of the history of the topic. Shameful.

You should read more.

So, then, no link?