As I have already mentioned there have always been some decent folks in the USA, a small minority.
"It never attracted many followers; only two percent of northerners were abolitionists, ... . "
Truthatallcost fascinated by Jews as usual. I am shocked I tell you, shocked!
The USA genocide against the Blacks and the USA genocide against Native Americans. Y'all really ought not to be pointing fingers. The hypocrisy is over the top.
Didn't they control the slave trade, which lead to the Civil War in the first place? That's left out of the movies and school text books Hari. I wonder why.............. no I don't!
Yet when that honor somehow only happens when civil rights are expanded... the ‘honoring of war dead’ 100 years after the war is not really what it seems.
The USA genocide against the Blacks and the USA genocide against Native Americans. Y'all really ought not to be pointing fingers. The hypocrisy is over the top.
No. They didn't.
Didn't they control the slave trade, which lead to the Civil War in the first place? That's left out of the movies and school text books Hari. I wonder why.............. no I don't!
The debate over the extension of slavery to new territories was absolutely crucial to the lead up to the civil war, and the side which opposed it didn't do it on moral, 'human rights' ground. Oftentimes, the opposition to the exposure of slavery to new territories was couched in ways which prioritized white labor. The south wanted to extend slavery so that they would have enough votes to preserve the institution if northeastern abolitionists moved to abolish it, but the northerners who opposed that position did not often argue from a principled position of abolitionusn. They argued from a position of protecting the honest, hardworking white man from unfair competition with negro slave labor. The move to prevent slave labor from extending to new territories in the 19th century would certainly be characterized as white nationalism today. And while I do not doubt that Lincoln personally opposed slavery, he was willing to compromise on the issue if it helped him politically, having famously stated that he would end the war even if it left every slave in chains.
Didn't they control the slave trade, which lead to the Civil War in the first place? That's left out of the movies and school text books Hari. I wonder why.............. no I don't!
Are you aware of Monsanto? The name comes from a Spanish Jewish family, which sold slaves long before the 'GMO's kill lab mice' scandal which brought their name to public attention. They were some of the latest slave traders.
That honoring of war dead coincided with the Spanish American War, the first war in which Confederate and Union soldiers fought together. The McKinley speech which I quoted earlier was in the aftermath of that war, hence the references to recent honorable service. This sparked off a fervor of Confederate monument building and was seen as the moment that the nation began to close up the wounds opened by the Civil War. Recently, a bunch of dumb articles have tried to link this to some sort of resurgence in reactionary KKK activity, which if you look at the actually timeline is idiotic. The first Ku Klux Clan was stamped out decades before this wave of monuments was built, and the second wasn't even formed until the spike in monuments had ended.
Didn't they control the slave trade, which lead to the Civil War in the first place? That's left out of the movies and school text books Hari. I wonder why.............. no I don't!
It was the British who were heavily into the slave trade. I am unsure if they were Jewish, perhaps some were. I suspect most were Christians, but not ones who had a conscience.
Why is that?
They controlled everything! Still do. You already know that I bet.
History has been revised yank. Jews are the tireless proponents of civil rights for minorities, instead of the slave traders, slave owners, and treasonous force they were in the 19th century. This is Public Relations 101- change your image.
What are you going on about, what do those two events have to do with the topic of the thread?
Anyone who celebrates the Confederacy is ignorant of history. Oh and I do pick up history books, it was my major in college.
That honoring of war dead coincided with the Spanish American War, the first war in which Confederate and Union soldiers fought together. The McKinley speech which I quoted earlier was in the aftermath of that war, hence the references to recent honorably service. This sparked off a fervor of Confederate monument building and was seen as the moment that the nation began to close up the wounds opened by the Civil War. Recently, a bunch of dumb articles have tried to link this to some sort of resurgence in reactionary KKK activity, which if you look at the actually timeline is idiotic. The first Ku Klux Clan was stamped out decade before this wave of monuments was built, and the second wasn't even formed until the spike in monuments had ended.
Because, you know, it sorta just sounds like you are straight up paraphrasing Nazi propaganda posters at this point.
Pragmatism.
No one reading his writings can come to the conclusion he didn't deplore slavery.
The problem was keeping the loyalty of the border states which were anti secession but pro slavery.
And that is why the Emancipation Proclamation only affected states in open conflict with the north.
The Nazis loved the effectiveness of the USA propaganda system and they took it as their own.
The KKK was formed and actively consisted of ex-Confederates.
]
Lolz, let's speak in hyperbole to avoid the issue Hari, and fool people some more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?