• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Apple Studios takes on the Peach State, exits Georgia production citing voter suppression law

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,329
Reaction score
82,720
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

4/12/21
Stacey Abrams indicated the best way to help Georgia was to stay and fight. For some companies that are not already in Georgia, however, the question is not about staying and fighting, it’s about whether or not to bring new business to the Peach State. On April 12, 2021, Will Smith, Antoine Fuqua, and Apple Studios decided that starting production on their new Apple TV series, “Emancipation,” in Georgia simply wasn’t worth it, especially in consideration of current events. While staying to fight may be fine, they didn’t feel compelled to inject more funds into a state that had enacted terrible anti-voting rights policies. Apple’s runaway slave thriller Emancipation today will change its plan to shoot in Georgia, because of the state’s controversial restrictive election law signed by Republican state governor Brian Kemp. I’ve heard that the film — Antoine Fuqua is directing Will Smith from a William N. Collage script — will likely instead shoot in Louisiana, where the actual events of the thriller took place. The move will cost the production somewhere in the $15 million range, because of the loss of the lucrative tax rebates that have made Georgia such a busy U.S. production hub.

What is important to note here is that Apple recognizes that having the Peach State branding on a film could be a real problem for a film about oppression and slavery in light of recently passed legislation. This pending move comes after weeks of discussions between the filmmakers and film officials in Georgia and Louisiana, and with Georgia political leaders like Stacey Abrams. Along with Tyler Perry and some others, Abrams has urged Hollywood not to uproot its productions in response to the passage of restrictive election law that followed President Joe Biden’s election victory. Emancipation won’t likely presage a Georgia exodus. This is a special case, one where the optics of shooting in Georgia would be difficult given the subject matter. Carrying the familiar Peach symbol on this particular Apple film could undermine the power of the movie’s subject matter. Apple originally paid $130 million dollars for the project. The expected overall cost will be north of that number, not counting local tax stimulus from pay earned and dollars spent in the state from the production.


The optics of filming a TV series about slavery in Georgia would be extremely problematic. The Republican Georgia legislatures have passed new state laws making it more difficult for African-Americans to vote.

Georgia Governor Kemp and Republican state leaders signed the new Jim Crow voting legislation under a painting of the notorious Callaway Plantation in in Wilkes County, Ga. which was infamous for cruelty to its slaves.

Georgia-Gov-Brian-Kemp-signs-sweeping-election-rule-changes-into-law.jpg
 




The optics of filming a TV series about slavery in Georgia would be extremely problematic. The Republican Georgia legislatures have passed new state laws making it more difficult for African-Americans to vote.

Georgia Governor Kemp and Republican state leaders signed the new Jim Crow voting legislation under a painting of the notorious Callaway Plantation in in Wilkes County, Ga. which was infamous for cruelty to its slaves.

Georgia-Gov-Brian-Kemp-signs-sweeping-election-rule-changes-into-law.jpg

What is the language in the new law aimed at African Americans?
 
Jim Crow style laws don't target specifically, they create situations that impact BIPOC more than other groups. Believe me, GA is happy to impact other minority groups too.

While I like to believe those that make sense, I would prefer that you present a case to support your assertion rather than simply demanding that I believe you.
 
Whew, thank God! I am a huge fan of Apple products. MacBook, iPhone, Apple TV, Apple Watch, my house has a lot of HomeKit in it. I am so relieved to know I don't have to throw these things out now that Apple has confirmed they don't like Georgia's laws. Up until I read this thread I was left to assume that Tim Cook fully supported the new voting regulations in Georgia. I even suspected he had a hand in writing them. But now at least we know where Apple stands. After all, the only reason I buy Apple products and services is because they think exactly like I do. Now we just need UPS and Coca-Cola to relocate. Am I the only one who finds it weird they haven't moved their headquarters yet? There has to be a racist agenda for them to be there. And CNN? It's going to be really hard for me to watch that channel without thinking about their tacit support for keeping black people from voting. And another frustration for me is Home Depot. I need to put some shelves in my garage. How can I buy lumber from Home Depot while they keep their white supremacist headquarters in that state? As of this writing Apple is still displaying Georgia as a state on Apple Maps. This is disgusting. Why should I have to suffer the pain of seeing that state on the map when I look at it? Apple, be better. Be consistent. How can Apple keep their nine Apple Stores open in that state?

Taking these jobs from Georgia and keeping Apple's money out of the Georgia economy is only a beginning! Apple and MLB's strategy of harming Georgian workers needs to be seen as an example for how to punish ordinary people for being oppressed and not having the financial ability to move out of the state. Home Depot, Coca-Cola, UPS, CNN, and many others: you're up!
 
What is the language in the new law aimed at African Americans?

If I napalm a mostly-white trailer park in Alabama, I could say that I'm not specifically targeting white Republican voters. However, since we're all adults here, we both know that white Republican voters are going to be overwhelmingly napalmed.

Of course, I won't say that my napalm campaign is focused on anti-white, anti-Republican voters. I'll say it's about protecting election security.
 
What is the language in the new law aimed at African Americans?
Careful, this is the part where you might get them to say that black people are too stupid to obtain an ID or find their proper polling location.
 
Jim Crow style laws don't target specifically, they create situations that impact BIPOC more than other groups. Believe me, GA is happy to impact other minority groups too.

Ok, what situations created by the law impact BIPOC more than others? Is it the part where they have to bring their own water?
 
While I like to believe those that make sense, I would prefer that you present a case to support your assertion rather than simply demanding that I believe you.
No Jim Crow style law makes sense.
 
Ok, what situations created by the law impact BIPOC more than others? Is it the part where they have to bring their own water?
Excellent example. " Relative to entirely-white neighborhoods, residents of entirely-black neighborhoods waited 29% longer to vote and were 74% more likely to spend more than 30 minutes at their polling place. This disparity holds when comparing predominantly white and black polling places within the same states and counties, and survives numerous robustness and placebo tests."
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00024.pdf
 
Well I hope this sort of pushback continues. The GOP knows that voter suppression is the only way they can keep in power, but maybe society isn't going to let them get off scot-free any longer.
 
Ok, what situations created by the law impact BIPOC more than others? Is it the part where they have to bring their own water?
You probably won't get an answer. As a registered voter in GA, it will not impact my ability to vote one bit. Most who feign indignance, probably haven't taken the time to read it or better yet, compare it to other states' existing voting laws. No state is perfect but this doesn't suppress anyone's right. Don't worry though, the wind will blow soon and the in crowd will go chase another butterfly.
 




The optics of filming a TV series about slavery in Georgia would be extremely problematic. The Republican Georgia legislatures have passed new state laws making it more difficult for African-Americans to vote.

Georgia Governor Kemp and Republican state leaders signed the new Jim Crow voting legislation under a painting of the notorious Callaway Plantation in in Wilkes County, Ga. which was infamous for cruelty to its slaves.

Georgia-Gov-Brian-Kemp-signs-sweeping-election-rule-changes-into-law.jpg
Good, **** those racist SOBs. When their state is in shambles, we'll all know why Sherman once again burned it to the ground.
 
Excellent example. " Relative to entirely-white neighborhoods, residents of entirely-black neighborhoods waited 29% longer to vote and were 74% more likely to spend more than 30 minutes at their polling place. This disparity holds when comparing predominantly white and black polling places within the same states and counties, and survives numerous robustness and placebo tests."
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00024.pdf

"We estimate .... that moving from a census block group with no black residents to one that is entirely composed of black residents is associated with a 5.23 minute longer wait time."

5.23 minutes?!?!? Wow, they might as well start burning crosses while they're at it. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that a higher percentage of blacks most likely live in more densely populated neighborhoods, or anything like that.

Ok, you have me convinced. A person could literally die of thirst during that extra 5.23 minutes.

But what does this article, published last year, have to do with the GA law we're discussing?
 
"We estimate .... that moving from a census block group with no black residents to one that is entirely composed of black residents is associated with a 5.23 minute longer wait time."

5.23 minutes?!?!? Wow, they might as well start burning crosses while they're at it. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that a higher percentage of blacks most likely live in more densely populated neighborhoods, or anything like that.

Ok, you have me convinced. A person could literally die of thirst during that extra 5.23 minutes.

But what does this article, published last year, have to do with the GA law we're discussing?
Please provide the source of your quote, if it is from my cite, please give me more context, putting an ellipsis in the middle of the quote leaves its meaning unclear.

On average, a heterosexual couple has one testicle and one ovary. More population should mean more precincts, not more people voting at one precinct.

No one ever claimed people would die, I doubt the soldiers who have died fighting to protect Americans right to vote would find your comment clever.

The GA law is Jim Crow style legislation. Preventing delivery of water is a moot point in white precincts, it's not in BIPOC precincts.
 




The optics of filming a TV series about slavery in Georgia would be extremely problematic. The Republican Georgia legislatures have passed new state laws making it more difficult for African-Americans to vote.

Georgia Governor Kemp and Republican state leaders signed the new Jim Crow voting legislation under a painting of the notorious Callaway Plantation in in Wilkes County, Ga. which was infamous for cruelty to its slaves.

Georgia-Gov-Brian-Kemp-signs-sweeping-election-rule-changes-into-law.jpg

How many Georgia jobs have been lost due to the lies from the left?
How many black businesses have suffered due to the lies from the left?

Has anyone explained what part of the law suppresses the right to vote? Stop with the water BS and ID argument. Anyone who wants an ID can get one.
 
Whew, thank God! I am a huge fan of Apple products. MacBook, iPhone, Apple TV, Apple Watch, my house has a lot of HomeKit in it. I am so relieved to know I don't have to throw these things out now that Apple has confirmed they don't like Georgia's laws. Up until I read this thread I was left to assume that Tim Cook fully supported the new voting regulations in Georgia. I even suspected he had a hand in writing them. But now at least we know where Apple stands. After all, the only reason I buy Apple products and services is because they think exactly like I do. Now we just need UPS and Coca-Cola to relocate. Am I the only one who finds it weird they haven't moved their headquarters yet? There has to be a racist agenda for them to be there. And CNN? It's going to be really hard for me to watch that channel without thinking about their tacit support for keeping black people from voting. And another frustration for me is Home Depot. I need to put some shelves in my garage. How can I buy lumber from Home Depot while they keep their white supremacist headquarters in that state? As of this writing Apple is still displaying Georgia as a state on Apple Maps. This is disgusting. Why should I have to suffer the pain of seeing that state on the map when I look at it? Apple, be better. Be consistent. How can Apple keep their nine Apple Stores open in that state?

Taking these jobs from Georgia and keeping Apple's money out of the Georgia economy is only a beginning! Apple and MLB's strategy of harming Georgian workers needs to be seen as an example for how to punish ordinary people for being oppressed and not having the financial ability to move out of the state. Home Depot, Coca-Cola, UPS, CNN, and many others: you're up!

I wonder if all of these companies plan to pull out of China.
 
If I napalm a mostly-white trailer park in Alabama, I could say that I'm not specifically targeting white Republican voters. However, since we're all adults here, we both know that white Republican voters are going to be overwhelmingly napalmed.

Of course, I won't say that my napalm campaign is focused on anti-white, anti-Republican voters. I'll say it's about protecting election security.
Or in this case, home property values
 
If I napalm a mostly-white trailer park in Alabama, I could say that I'm not specifically targeting white Republican voters. However, since we're all adults here, we both know that white Republican voters are going to be overwhelmingly napalmed.

Of course, I won't say that my napalm campaign is focused on anti-white, anti-Republican voters. I'll say it's about protecting election security.

Are planning to napalm a trailer park or admitting that you have done so in the past?

What's make you bring this up?
 
Careful, this is the part where you might get them to say that black people are too stupid to obtain an ID or find their proper polling location.

That is what they are implying.

The view of the "Black" Community held by the Democrat-Socialists is wholly condemning.
 
"We estimate .... that moving from a census block group with no black residents to one that is entirely composed of black residents is associated with a 5.23 minute longer wait time."

5.23 minutes?!?!? Wow, they might as well start burning crosses while they're at it. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that a higher percentage of blacks most likely live in more densely populated neighborhoods, or anything like that.

Ok, you have me convinced. A person could literally die of thirst during that extra 5.23 minutes.

But what does this article, published last year, have to do with the GA law we're discussing?
more than 30 minutes is too much, even if its 30:01
 
How many Georgia jobs have been lost due to the lies from the left?
How many black businesses have suffered due to the lies from the left?

Has anyone explained what part of the law suppresses the right to vote? Stop with the water BS and ID argument. Anyone who wants an ID can get one.
And the left and all of the business stating they are not for these voting changes proposed by the gop are all wrong. Is that your stance?
 
While I like to believe those that make sense, I would prefer that you present a case to support your assertion rather than simply demanding that I believe you.
I have been hearing conservatives ask this same question over and over again for a few weeks now. Do you think that it's possible there is some truth in it since over 200 corporations nationwide have come out against these new voting laws? Are they all wrong? Or are you wrong?
 
Back
Top Bottom