Apparently, John 'Beautiful Mind' Nash hated Keynesianiam

[DA60]

'He sees Keynesians as “manipulative.”

So let us define “Keynesian” to be descriptive of a “school of thought” that originated at the time of the devaluations of the pound and the dollar in the early 30’s of the 20th century. Then, more specifically, a “Keynesian” would favor the existence of a “manipulative” state establishment of central bank and treasury which would continuously seek to achieve “economic welfare” objectives with comparatively little regard for the long term reputation of the national currency and the associated effects of that on the reputation of financial enterprises domestic to the state.'

https://www.dollarvigilante.com/blog/2015/06/01/john-nash-hated-keynesians.html

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-02/john-nash-hated-kaynesians

 

[RAMOSS]

'He sees Keynesians as “manipulative.”

So let us define “Keynesian” to be descriptive of a “school of thought” that originated at the time of the devaluations of the pound and the dollar in the early 30’s of the 20th century. Then, more specifically, a “Keynesian” would favor the existence of a “manipulative” state establishment of central bank and treasury which would continuously seek to achieve “economic welfare” objectives with comparatively little regard for the long term reputation of the national currency and the associated effects of that on the reputation of financial enterprises domestic to the state.'

https://www.dollarvigilante.com/blog/2015/06/01/john-nash-hated-keynesians.html

John Nash Hated Keynesians | Zero Hedge

The first one was quote mining. I looked at a few of the original quotes, and they were taken out of context. The second one is an antonymous group of people in a panic web site who has a definite bias. Well, both have the austrian economics bias, but the first one at least is more respectable , even if they took the quotes out of context.

 

[Bigfoot 88]

Nobel winner Nash critiques economic theory

 

[imagep]

Nobel winner Nash critiques economic theory

I didn't see any references to Keynesian economics. Although it is interesting to see that he was involved in economics, I didn't know that.

I do find it amusing that the OP is trying to defend or prove his bias based upon the rantings of a certified madman.