- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
my argument as factually never changed LOL
I posted this point pages ago and it hasnt altered at all LMAO, let me know when you have anything factual to take away form that point because all your doing is posting spin, after spin, after spin.
ill keep waiting, this thread isnt going anywhere. wonder what you will try to make up next because my quotes support me as they are written, not what you make up they mean LMAO
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-29.html#post1061554115
except when it did above ...
You're right that whatever point you had was posted pages ago but since then your posts have just taken up space. Why not return to the topic of the thread if you are still interested?
only in your head, not in realty, not based on facts and not based on my quotes or words
i have been just about every couple posts :shrug:
the thread OP fails because it illogically uses the actions of some to judge the group.
thats the point
1.)'The group' is those Muslims who are burning down the homes of Christians. We know that 'not all Muslims are terrorists'. We all understand that by now. If they were all terrorists they'd be much easier to locate.
2.)What concerns many are those who are terrorists, such as those murdering Christians right now and /or burning down their homes. Is it possible to address that issue without all the usual cliches?
1.) obviously the OP does not know this
2.) yes it would be possible in an honest thread that didn't have a failed, dishonest, illogical, cliched and bigoted OP :shrug:
if the OP was looking for honest non "cliched" response then the OP should have start an honest non cliched thread.
How would you have worded it?
How would you have worded it?
easy
I would of left out the nonsensical and dishonest parts grouping islam/muslims as a whole :shrug:
8
1) his comment concerned Islam " being the religion of peace". Unless you are claiming Islam *is* the religion of peace, I am unsure what you are taking issue with
2) as stated previous, and which you failed to address. Even if Islam was an inherently violent religion, such does not amount to every Muslim being violent. The religion is still interpreted
thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :
he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:
thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :
he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:
My OP is not difficult to find.....just scroll to the top of the page and click the "First" icon in the thread results section. All I said, and sarcastically mind you, was "Ah, Islam....ever the religion of peace." How this is specifically targeting ALL individual Muslims is quite beyond me. I even went as far, in a few posts later, as to address a Muslim poster specifically to point out that in no-way did I honestly believe that EVERY Muslim supported or participated in acts of violence against other religions.
If you do not believe that Islam, as both a religious and political institution has proven to be a "Religion of Peace".....then, by all means, provide evidence to the contrary.
Your failure to understand simple sarcasm and to twist facts is truly a thing to behold. Since you've been caught endorsing another poster's fraudelent statistics regarding the probable number of "violent" Muslims........you done nothing more than blatantly deny facts and have even consistently denied what you've actually said in this thread even after it's been pointed out to you repeatedly in over 10 pages........several times by quoting you directly.
Blatant denial with absolutely zero evidence to support your claim, is not really a good way to "win" people over to your position. This method tends to work only among circles of 4th-graders on school playgrounds........and even then, only when dealing with especially "dense" 4th-graders. :shrug:
Please explain how I am wrong then. I will even post the quote you referenced and your comments on it, again
If you disagreed with the "one million" number, then why did you clearly endorse it as you do above?
Yet, we are presented with the glaring fact that you can't explain how it doesn't support me, beyond going "nu-uh" ...
besides when it did change, as is documented here:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-29.html#post1061554115
What a well thought out argument: you're wrong because I said so!
So how did he group them together, exactly?
My OP is not difficult to find.....just scroll to the top of the page and click the "First" icon in the thread results section. All I said, and sarcastically mind you, was "Ah, Islam....ever the religion of peace." How this is specifically targeting ALL individual Muslims is quite beyond me. I even went as far, in a few posts later, as to address a Muslim poster specifically to point out that in no-way did I honestly believe that EVERY Muslim supported or participated in acts of violence against other religions.
If you DO believe that Islam, as both a religious and political institution has proven to be a "Religion of Peace".....then, by all means, provide evidence to the contrary.
Your failure to understand simple sarcasm and to twist facts is truly a thing to behold. Since you've been caught endorsing another poster's fraudelent statistics regarding the probable number of "violent" Muslims........you done nothing more than blatantly deny facts and have even consistently denied what you've actually said in this thread even after it's been pointed out to you repeatedly in over 10 pages........several times by quoting you directly.
Blatant denial with absolutely zero evidence to support your claim, is not really a good way to "win" people over to your position. This method tends to work only among circles of 4th-graders on school playgrounds........and even then, only when dealing with especially "dense" 4th-graders. :shrug:
LMAO, derp, logic, I win~!!!
Lol, I'm not ashamed of it, nor do I wish to retract it.....I even explained in detail how to go about finding it. :lol:you do understand your OP is still here for all to read right?
unless you can make that go awyay the points made by me and others stand
your OP is a failure because it dishonestly and illogical condemns a group based on the actions of some :shrug:
I've already said that I'm not bothered in the least by what I said.....only by your direct misrepresentation of it.if this fact bothers you the solution is easy, you simply shouldnt have made the nonsensical OP or you should retract you illogical assumption. Its all up to you
When have I denied what I posted? :thinking:but denying what you posted and trying to back pedal wont help you LMAO.
If there were such a thing.....you'd truly be deserving of the "Teflon Poster of the Year" award. :lol:I have denied no facts, not one, this is a bold face lie :shrug:
if you disagree please point out the fact i denied, i cant wait lmao
You've wined and cried for pages now, and it's getting to the point of being ridiculous.
You can't classify those who symphathize with islamistic organizations as violent themselves. The criteria was 1 million VIOLENT, radical muslims. If there were actually 1 million VIOLENT muslims, we would have far, far more problems than we have today.
thats what you dont get, its not an "argument" LMAO
it has nothing to do with "me", this is why you keep failing, YOU are arguing, im only pointing out what factually happened
I'm not sure how quoting you and obj J, citing academic research, and offering arguments on a debate site amount to "whining and crying"
It wasn't based with them "sympathizing" with islamist organizations, it was based on the fact that they support executing people over their religion. If that isn't a violent position, I don't know what is
if you disagree please point out the fact i denied, i cant wait lmao
easy
I would of left out the nonsensical and dishonest parts grouping islam/muslims as a whole :shrug:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?