AOC to Trump: 'We didn't ask you'

[MAGAnificent]

Factually, the pollsters were correct. HRC did win the popular vote (by nearly 3,000,000).

Keep calling them “fake news polls”, Skippy, but don’t be surprised when the current fake president is booted out of office.

Sorry sport, the hildabeast won nothing as we do not elect presidents by popular vote. As for 2020 you are making the same miistake you made in 2016......counting your chickens before they hatch. Even if you think there is an announced democrat who can beat him, chances are that independant Howard Schultz will split the Democrat vote and hand the election to Trump.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[marke]

Oh, goodie! Look at all the vulgar sexism by the insecure and impotent when facing a woman with intelligence and power, who is not afraid to use both. The sound of "shrinkage" in this thread is deafening! :lol:

To some people AOC is a woman with intelligence and power. Maybe so, but she has definitely been deluded by bad political dogma and utter nonsense if she believes some of those things she promotes. However, she may be very smart. She may know those things are stupid lies but she is playing to stupid people in order to build support for herself and her group-think democrat agenda.

 

[snakestretcher]

Only in Trumpland. The rest of the world knows that the above is complete nonsense. That's why the USA is a laughing stock around the world.

Or do you evidence to support this absurd claim?

What some of these idiots describe as 'socialism' in America would be seen as conservatism-lite in the UK. The US was once respected and admired for all sorts of reasons. That moronic goon in the White House has managed to erode decades of mutual respect and affection in less than three years. So much winning.

 

[yankintx]

:lol:


AOC reminds Trump in tweet about tax return request: '''We didn'''t ask you''' | Fox News

Sometimes it takes a woman !!

Luv it, AOC is correct. the request is to the IRS. Trumps return does not belong to him. It is the property of a goverment agency.

 

[snakestretcher]

No one sees how AOC has taken to abusing her power like a duck to water? The overt threats?

How, by speaking her mind? You know, free speech and all that?

 

[yankintx]

You think AOC is intelligent? :lamo Damn you have low standards. Her picture is right next to the words ditz and bimbo in my dictionary. Have you even heard her speak on any issue with some coherence? I certainly haven't. Power she may have, but intelligence... ahh no, not all, not even a smidge. You get better coherence from a bag of hammers. Electing a magic eight ball would be an improvement.

Since you brought up standards, how low did yours go to support a leader with zero integrity?

 

[MAGAnificent]

Oh, goodie! Look at all the vulgar sexism by the insecure and impotent when facing a woman with intelligence and power, who is not afraid to use both. The sound of "shrinkage" in this thread is deafening! [emoji38]

I beg to differ. AOC is certainly not a woman of intelligence. She did not even know about three separate branches of government. As for power, her only power is one vote out of 435 representatives. She is a freshman representative elected to a two year term. She just thinks she runs the show. At best she has the mental maturity of an eighth grader.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[snakestretcher]

Oh, goodie! Look at all the vulgar sexism by the insecure and impotent when facing a woman with intelligence and power, who is not afraid to use both. The sound of "shrinkage" in this thread is deafening! :lol:

Old white conservative men who still believe a woman's place is in the home, patiently awaiting husband's arrival from his daily toil with warmed slippers and a refreshing drink. Fortunately these dinosaurs are rapidly dying out. They just hate that their imagined patriarchy is being challenged by a young, attractive and intelligent woman who is not afraid to tell them where to get off!.

 

[snakestretcher]

I beg to differ. AOC is certainly not a woman of intelligence. She did not even know about three separate branches of government. As for power, her only power is one vote out of 435 representatives. She is a freshman representative elected to a two year term. She just thinks she runs the show. At best she has the mental maturity of an eighth grader.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Mental maturity? Perhaps you should check your post before denigrating a person who actually achieved something.

 

[snakestretcher]

BimboDancer doesn't deserve the same kind of respect most women get.

Have you seen the video of her and the popcorn? LOL!!

You call her a 'bimbo' in the same sentence as claiming you believe most women are respected? Evidently not by you.

 

[snakestretcher]

To some people AOC is a woman with intelligence and power. Maybe so, but she has definitely been deluded by bad political dogma and utter nonsense if she believes some of those things she promotes. However, she may be very smart. She may know those things are stupid lies but she is playing to stupid people in order to build support for herself and her group-think democrat agenda.

In that regard she is playing no differently from Trump and his stupid lies. The 10% tax cut, Mexico paying for The Wall, the 'from day one' repeal and replacement of ACA. All lies, every last one of them-and they're just the tip of the pathological liar's iceberg of lies. Group think? Talk to the idiots who still believe Trump.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Sorry sport, the hildabeast won nothing as we do not elect presidents by popular vote. As for 2020 you are making the same miistake you made in 2016......counting your chickens before they hatch. Even if you think there is an announced democrat who can beat him, chances are that independant Howard Schultz will split the Democrat vote and hand the election to Trump.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You falsely claimed the pollsters were wrong in ‘16. They said HRC would win the popular vote. She did.

As for Schultz, Trumpsters like you should be praying that he gets in (he won’t).

 

[MAGAnificent]

Mental maturity? Perhaps you should check your post before denigrating a person who actually achieved something.

If the woman did not display such utter ignorance in regards to the position she has been elected to, I would have some respect for her achievements. Which part of "She did not know about the three separate but equal branches of government. " did you not understand? She also has a poor grasp of American History. As she does not display a high school level education, why should I respect her Boston College Degree? As far as I am concerned, she is just a young bar tender with a pretty face who somehow managed to get elected to the House of Representatives.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[OldFatGuy]

Indeed, you have invoked vulgarity and sexism in your fictitious idiocy to "ha-ha-ha,I am so wonderful and powerful, worship me!" Bah. Dumbness.

Yes, I did, and I will do it again. She warrants what she gets. There are women I admire and respect, and women I don't. She is not one of the women I admire or respect, and she draws the worst from me. Her powers to do so are incalculable. :lamo

No, my reaction is not one of idiocy, it is one of disgust. She's a fraud. A spoiled millennial product of wealth pretending to be one of the people and for the people while she is neither. Penetrate the facade, or is that too sexist a wording for you? Like Fidel, little Fidel comes from wealth. She fabricates everything about her persona, using ethnicity as a rallying cry. Let her have fun assembling Ikea furniture, it is what she does best, using a screwdriver.

In the words of a long dead Rock & Roller, "She's a pretender." You've been suckered. (oops! another non PC word. :mrgreen

 

[MAGAnificent]

You falsely claimed the pollsters were wrong in ‘16. They said HRC would win the popular vote. She did.

As for Schultz, Trumpsters like you should be praying that he gets in (he won’t).

I suppose you will never get it. The national polls are just for media and campaign fodder during the campaign season. They are not used to predict the outcome. Those predictions are based on state by state polls. Even the candidates depend solely on state by state polls to figure out where they need to deploy resources or appearances. As for Scultz, I rather doubt I would agree with him on much, however he us not bat **** crazy like the rest of the Democrat field is. He represents the pre-1992 Democrat party. I rather hope he does get in the race. Whether he does or not, you have no more inside knowledge then I do.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[Mycroft]

You call her a 'bimbo' in the same sentence as claiming you believe most women are respected? Evidently not by you.

Operative words..."doesn't deserve".

Moving on...

 

[snakestretcher]

Operative words..."doesn't deserve".

Moving on...

Your opinion, as always, is noted.

 

[marke]

In that regard she is playing no differently from Trump and his stupid lies. The 10% tax cut, Mexico paying for The Wall, the 'from day one' repeal and replacement of ACA. All lies, every last one of them-and they're just the tip of the pathological liar's iceberg of lies. Group think? Talk to the idiots who still believe Trump.

Politicians are liars. Look at how politicians promised to cut funding to the democrat Planned Parenthood PAC with the Hyde Amendment and then spent the better part of 4 decades refusing to honor its commitments.

 

[snakestretcher]

Politicians are liars. Look at how politicians promised to cut funding to the democrat Planned Parenthood PAC with the Hyde Amendment and then spent the better part of 4 decades refusing to honor its commitments.

And yet you still voted for a liar, a racist and a crook who surrounds himself with crooks. Congratulations, you got what you wanted.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I suppose you will never get it. The national polls are just for media and campaign fodder during the campaign season. They are not used to predict the outcome. Those predictions are based on state by state polls. Even the candidates depend solely on state by state polls to figure out where they need to deploy resources or appearances. As for Scultz, I rather doubt I would agree with him on much, however he us not bat **** crazy like the rest of the Democrat field is. He represents the pre-1992 Democrat party. I rather hope he does get in the race. Whether he does or not, you have no more inside knowledge then I do.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I understand how polling is done. I’m not the one who said all the pollsters were wrong.

I didn’t suggest I have any inside knowledge, but based on your posts, I definitely have more public knowledge and understanding than you.

 

[MAGAnificent]

I understand how polling is done. I’m not the one who said all the pollsters were wrong.

I didn’t suggest I have any inside knowledge, but based on your posts, I definitely have more public knowledge and understanding than you.

No you clearly do not understand how polling is done and which part of "The pollsters themselves admitted that they got it wrong" do you still not understand? You are just desperately clinging to national polls for the sake of your "But but but Hillary won the popular vote" narrative. Hillary won nothing. We do not elect presidents by popular vote. Do yourself a favor and look at an electoral college map for the outcome of the 2016 race. Its largely red, not blue. Then follow up by looking at a county by county map. Not much blue.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

[marke]

And yet you still voted for a liar, a racist and a crook who surrounds himself with crooks. Congratulations, you got what you wanted.

I did. Because I did not see Hillary as a saint, I voted from Trump in spite of his sins.

 

[PirateMk1]

Since you brought up standards, how low did yours go to support a leader with zero integrity?

I threw them into the garbage disposal, then hit the on switch. Standards? What the hell are those?

 

[yankintx]

I threw them into the garbage disposal, then hit the on switch. Standards? What the hell are those?

I believe that is the response from most Trump supporters when confronted with the mans zero integrity.

 

[marke]

And yet you still voted for a liar, a racist and a crook who surrounds himself with crooks. Congratulations, you got what you wanted.

Leftist crazies could not detect a real liar and crook even if she ran ran for president.