• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anyone up for a test?

The entire conversation is just completely retarded to be honest.
Out of curiosity, what were YOUR test scores?
It seems odd to me that some of us on here were able to take the test and not be embarrassed about our answers, while others want to attack the test. So again.................
 
This test bothered me on several levels, my results...

20250905 - racism test results.webp

I do not know who all took the test, so me being such a percentage less by category against "the average person" could be okay or not depending on everyone else. But no number on its own tells me I am really doing well or just a hair below average. A range of 5.73% to 30.07% on just 20 questions give me pause. And that brings me to the last point, that in the end there is no reference on what do really consider differently or follow up on to observe how others score better outside of a pay form to presumably access these things.

Some of the questions were awkwardly written to expose how a white person would answer without any relation to racial stereotypes we see comedians, political commentary, and even various mainstream commercials exploit with striking frequency. But, for the test takers are a flag altering the results.

I am leaving this feeling mixed on what the value really is outside of political identity warfare gotcha results. Not even sure those that formulated this test actually speak well for the groups mentions in the questions as if they are all inherently offended by these things, which is in itself a showing of at least prejudice by the test organizers.

They will show you as being more or less prone to racism than the average person, and that is about it.
 
This test bothered me on several levels, my results...

View attachment 67587492

I do not know who all took the test, so me being such a percentage less by category against "the average person" could be okay or not depending on everyone else. But no number on its own tells me I am really doing well or just a hair below average. A range of 5.73% to 30.07% on just 20 questions give me pause. And that brings me to the last point, that in the end there is no reference on what do really consider differently or follow up on to observe how others score better outside of a pay form to presumably access these things.

Some of the questions were awkwardly written to expose how a white person would answer without any relation to racial stereotypes we see comedians, political commentary, and even various mainstream commercials exploit with striking frequency. But, for the test takers are a flag altering the results.

I am leaving this feeling mixed on what the value really is outside of political identity warfare gotcha results. Not even sure those that formulated this test actually speak well for the groups mentions in the questions as if they are all inherently offended by these things, which is in itself a showing of at least prejudice by the test organizers.

They will show you as being more or less prone to racism than the average person, and that is about it.
BUT....................................... at least you took the test and posted YOUR results.
Others on here did nothing but attack the test WITHOUT admitting what THEIR results were.
What should I conclude from that?

Btw. I liked YOUR results, no matter how flaky you thought the test was ;)
 
It seems odd to me that some of us on here were able to take the test and not be embarrassed about our answers, while others want to attack the test. So again.................

I think it's better to mock the puritanical nature of what makes someone more "racist-er" when the discourse is at the level of middle school cafeteria gossip.
 
I think it's better to mock the puritanical nature of what makes someone more "racist-er" when the discourse is at the level of middle school cafeteria gossip.
Still not willing to share YOUR results. Fine by me.
 
Still not willing to share YOUR results. Fine by me.

This makes you:​

  • 38.81% more prone to general racism than the average person.
  • 24.27% more prone to socio-historical racism than the average person.
  • 19.93% more prone to perpetual foreigner racism than the average person.
  • 27.9% more prone to racism than the average person overall.
 
All answers neutral you are

Screenshot 2025-09-05 122401.webp
  • 13.81% more prone to general racism than the average person.
  • 21.27% more prone to socio-historical racism than the average person.
  • 6.93% more prone to perpetual foreigner racism than the average person.
  • 13.9% more prone to racism than the average person overall.
Screenshot 2025-09-05 122437.webp
 

This makes you:​

  • 38.81% more prone to general racism than the average person.
  • 24.27% more prone to socio-historical racism than the average person.
  • 19.93% more prone to perpetual foreigner racism than the average person.
  • 27.9% more prone to racism than the average person overall.
Thanks for your honesty.
 
All answers neutral you are

View attachment 67587494
  • 13.81% more prone to general racism than the average person.
  • 21.27% more prone to socio-historical racism than the average person.
  • 6.93% more prone to perpetual foreigner racism than the average person.
  • 13.9% more prone to racism than the average person overall.
View attachment 67587495
Thanks for taking the test and posting your score.
 
Thanks for your honesty.

Ironically I was neutral on well over half of the questions, which were dubious.

Like I said: dumb test that doesn't really advance the discourse.
 
I did find some of them hard to answer either way. Why should I be offended if a non white doesn't speak perfect English without context? What is offensive about telling someone they resemble a famous person - if they do? And why is it only from a white to non white point of view, doesn't help when someone is mixed.

Anyway here are my results.

Racism Test​

YouPopulation Average

This makes you:​

  • 3.19% less prone to general racism than the average person.
  • 10.73% less prone to socio-historical racism than the average person.
  • 37.07% less prone to perpetual foreigner racism than the average person.
  • 17.1% less prone to racism than the average person overall.
Result chart
 
I took the test to the best of my ability, remained honest and true to the questions, posted the results and you accuse me of lying. What a bunch of BS. With this kind of response it's easy to spot who is the liar, after all you lied taking the test the first time, so you knew how to answer them to gain better scores the second time around. The entire OP is a ridiculous pile of crap.
Just the petulant trolling some have come to expect from this particular poster. ❄️
 
Ironically I was neutral on well over half of the questions, which were dubious.

Like I said: dumb test that doesn't really advance the discourse.
If you say so.
 
Let me repeat ONE MORE TIME............

Here is what teacher would say: Just answer the questions to the best of your ability. Unless THAT is a challenge.

The teacher would ask -

Do you agree that Western countries are imposing stricter immigration restrictions on people from non-White countries?

Explain your answer.

A teacher would never ask a question in this manner.

"It is legitimate for Western countries to impose stricter immigration restrictions on people from non-White countries than they do for immigrants from White countries."
 
Just the petulant trolling some have come to expect from this particular poster. ❄️
Have you checked on how many actually took the test and posted their results. Then there are those that just want to whine. Not sure, maybe some of those took the test, got the results they didn't want to display, so decided to attack the test of the poster. Not an original line of attack though, just sayin'
 
Btw. I liked YOUR results, no matter how flaky you thought the test was ;)

Shit, don't say that, I may get accused around here of being "woke"... 🍿
 
The teacher would ask -

Do you agree that Western countries are imposing stricter immigration restrictions on people from non-White countries?

Explain your answer.

A teacher would never ask a question in this manner.

"It is legitimate for Western countries to impose stricter immigration restrictions on people from non-White countries than they do for immigrants from White countries."
Well, just from my perspective, there must be a reason some simply refused to take the test, or if they did, didn't want to post their results. Others, and you can look through this thread to see who they are, DID take the test and posted their results.


Take a cue from OrphanSlug or americanwoman. Otherwise, whine some more. Up to you.
 
Shit, don't say that, I may get accused around here of being "woke"... 🍿
Well, the defensive attitude by some on here towards the test questions suggest THEY thing the test is "woke." :)
 
Well, just from my perspective, there must be a reason some simply refused to take the test, or if they did, didn't want to post their results. Others, and you can look through this thread to see who they are, DID take the test and posted their results.
If you want to get into a back n forth with me all day long on WHY you prefer to attack the test rather than take it or post your results, then knock yourself out. Doesn't mean I have to follow you down that rabbit hole.

Take a cue from OrphanSlug or americanwoman. Otherwise, whine some more. Up to you.

In fairness, you're not being particularly honest either.

It seems this thread isn't really for the purposes of starting a deeper discussion, rather it's to gaslight and bad jacket people over the results for an admittedly limited test.
 
Well, just from my perspective, there must be a reason some simply refused to take the test, or if they did, didn't want to post their results. Others, and you can look through this thread to see who they are, DID take the test and posted their results.
If you want to get into a back n forth with me all day long on WHY you prefer to attack the test rather than take it or post your results, then knock yourself out. Doesn't mean I have to follow you down that rabbit hole.

Take a cue from OrphanSlug or americanwoman. Otherwise, whine some more. Up to you.

I tried taking the test.

The questions are manipulative as I pointed out.
 
In fairness, you're not being particularly honest either.

It seems this thread isn't really for the purposes of starting a deeper discussion, rather it's to gaslight and bad jacket people over the results for an admittedly limited test.
It COULD be a discussion if people wanted to discuss the questions. But it won't be if all people want to do is whine about how the questions were asked. But you at least posted your results.
 
Back
Top Bottom