• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Any theories on why Trump is sending troops?

How about fixing whatever the local problem is that allows such crime to fester?
Sure, but that requires social programs and other measures some don't like. Locking everyone up has not worked because the reasons people resort to crime are still present, so if those issues are not resolved then crime persists. This is why I ask what the purpose of having the military there is since they will not be addressing the causes of crime. It's great PR event for military fetishists, but not a very effective solution.
 
You take things too literally.
No, I don’t. Choose your words more honestly. Nothing is being solved by Trump sending in troops to Democratic cities. Nothing.
There is some level of crime everywhere.
At least you admit this.
However, if crime in a specific city is chronically high to the point where it may as well be declared a war zone, bringing it down to a level where you do not need to fear for your life while walking or driving though is doable if the politicians in the city or state are willing to enact policies to address it. Chicago, especially the south side is a crime ridden shit hole. However, it can be solved.
You don’t live in Chicago. It seems like you have been there one time in your life, and it scared the shit out of you. But your posts show that you’ve got a perpetual hard-on for anything Chicago, constantly yapping like you know so much about the place. South Side? Hell, I’ll bet you’ve never even been to a White Sox game, but you supposedly know so much about Chicago? LOL.

Stop while you’re behind. You don’t know jack squat about Chicago.
 
Not in the public square.

So we get back to my point: why should anyone believe anything you have to say about Trump when you will support him here even when he's objectively wrong?
 
Nothing is being solved by Trump sending in troops to Democratic cities. Nothing.
You may have a point. Democrat politicians are rather stupid when it comes to law enforcement. "Defund the police" polcies come to mind.
You don’t live in Chicago. It seems like you have been there one time in your life, and it scared the shit out of you.
I don't live in Chicago. I have been there once and faced no fears at the time. OfCourse I did avoid the south side.
But your posts show that you’ve got a perpetual hard-on for anything Chicago, constantly yapping like you know so much about the place. South Side?
Well, my brother was a victim of crime in Chicago's south side in his truck driving days.
Hell, I’ll bet you’ve never even been to a White Sox game, but you supposedly know so much about Chicago? LOL.
Sorry, I not a baseball fan these days. :D
Stop while you’re behind. You don’t know jack squat about Chicago.
That would be accurate if I lived in a cave with no source of national news broadcasts, radio, newspapers, internet, etc. Violent crime in Chicago is quite frequently in the news if you have not noticed. Except for crime, Chicago has alot going for it.
 
I sort of asked this elsewhere with other questions, but want to repeat just the query in the subject line. What are the various theories commentators and DP participants have as to why Trump decided to send unrequested troops to US cities at a time when crime is down? Has Trump explained this in any rational way?

To provoke the people into engaging in protests so he can justify the insurrection act.
 
This is why I ask what the purpose of having the military there is since they will not be addressing the causes of crime.
The NG would only be there to work with police to get control. The solution would have to include state and local politicians addressing the causes. You mentioned social programs. That's part of the problem with inner city crime. LBJ era Great Society social programs that still exist today have institutionalized the inner-city poverty that leads to such crime. Something has to change.
 
Incoherent projection.
It's perfectly clear. And there's no projection involved.
You just use words that you like the sound of without knowing or caring what they mean.
 
The NG would only be there to work with police to get control.
Except they're not going to bring anything under control except perhaps drive some criminals to operate outside of patrolled zones. DC's been a great example of this since the bulk of the NG and Federal officers were not sent to where there are serious crime issues.

The solution would have to include state and local politicians addressing the causes. You mentioned social programs. That's part of the problem with inner city crime. LBJ era Great Society social programs that still exist today have institutionalized the inner-city poverty that leads to such crime. Something has to change.
Then what do you propose? None of the solutions that have brought crime down in cities have been enforcement alone.
 
To provoke the people into engaging in protests so he can justify the insurrection act.
And why does he want to do that? The only theory I can come up with is that he wants thru intimidation to reduce the possibility of losing Congress next year with the presence of troops a deterrent to voters. That seems far fetched to me.
 
So we get back to my point: why should anyone believe anything you have to say about Trump when you will support him here even when he's objectively wrong?
Did you ever notice the compulsive nature of some posters here?
 
So we get back to my point: why should anyone believe anything you have to say about Trump when you will support him here even when he's objectively wrong?
You have heard about RFK JR having a worm eat his brain, right?
 
Except they're not going to bring anything under control except perhaps drive some criminals to operate outside of patrolled zones. DC's been a great example of this since the bulk of the NG and Federal officers were not sent to where there are serious crime issues.


Then what do you propose? None of the solutions that have brought crime down in cities have been enforcement alone.
I am getting the impression that the left likes crime.
 
I am getting the impression that the left likes crime.
That would be incorrect. Based on last month's monthly letter, what The Left™ doesn't like is irresponsible use of NG troops and Federal agents to put on a show for the supposed "law and order" folks who only think fighting crime means locking people up, while also not realizing NG troops cannot arrest anyone and could probably be doing other things besides standing on street corners or picking up trash given how much it costs for them to do that.
 
I am getting the impression that the left likes crime.
How could we like crime and dislike Trump?

More seriously, what the left wants — what the cities need instead of troops — would be the restoration of funds for policing that the big bad bill cut.
 
I sort of asked this elsewhere with other questions, but want to repeat just the query in the subject line. What are the various theories commentators and DP participants have as to why Trump decided to send unrequested troops to US cities at a time when crime is down? Has Trump explained this in any rational way?
To crush the opposition, bending and breaking Blue strongholds, to ensure they won't do anything to stop him in the future.
 
How could we like crime and dislike Trump?

More seriously, what the left wants — what the cities need instead of troops — would be the restoration of funds for policing that the big bad bill cut.
Even better would be better education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social support.
 
Even better would be better education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social support.
We can have both, better trained and more police where necessary as well as what you suggest.
 
How could we like crime and dislike Trump?

More seriously, what the left wants — what the cities need instead of troops — would be the restoration of funds for policing that the big bad bill cut.
That's funny coming from the left that has pushed "Defund the Police" movements.
 
Back
Top Bottom