• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Any fans of Star Trek?

I'll have to check it out
It has lots of Easter eggs and callbacks to other series & characters. One needs a keen eye to spot them all. The USS Titan with Capt. Riker makes it's canonical appearance in the series too.
 
I liked the first season but as it surged in popularity Rick became a Mary Sue
Hardly. Rick was a very flawed character, but the smartest man in the universe.
"I'm as smart as you are dumb!" Rick to Morty
 
Lol, talk about dei. I think one of the reasons the original was so loved and is till around, DEI.
 
Yeah I wasn't a fan of the remakes. Not that the actors were bad it just doesn't compare. I don't know why they want to remake it when I create new characters?

I don't think there's a whole lot of imagination in Hollywood anymore. What they pump out these days is all groupthink. Remakes, sequels, adaptations of foreign TV series. Even with all of our streaming content providers, very seldom do you see anybody take a risk and put out something truly new and different and edgy anymore. Think how different Star Trek must have been to anything else on TV when it came out in 1966 - about the closest thing to it was probably Lost in Space. Then you have this show come out and it's tackling controversial issues in society head-on. Who's taking those risks today? What risks did they take with the remake movies? Like you say, they didn't even risk making up new characters! It's the triumph of the corporations over the creatives.
 
To be fair, Discovery does get better. Even TNG had a shacky start the first couple seasons.

The first season was a bit rocky.

Lots of shows have a rocky starts. Work out the kinks, see what works & what doesn't and so on.
 
The first season was a bit rocky.

Lots of shows have a rocky starts. Work out the kinks, see what works & what doesn't and so on.
Indeed. DS9 & Voyager had their spotty moments their first come seasons.
 
Ran.across this and since we're on the topic....

View attachment 67563530

Alot of Red Shirts bought it in the episode Obsession (blood-draining cloud).

And the Federation Time Cops noted that Kirk is the worst offender (biggest file on record) when it comes to temporal violations. In the DS9 ep Trials and Tribble-ations, 2 agents with the dept. stated he had "17 separate temporal violations" (most of which probably came from the events of Star Trek: The Voyage Home).
 
Alot of Red Shirts bought it in the episode Obsession (blood-draining cloud).
24 redshift died over the course of TOS.
Most likely. Although there were the time travels in: The Naked Time, Assignment:Earth, and Tomorrow is Yesterday.
 
24 redshift died over the course of TOS.
I know, but that ep saw a lot of Red Shirts get taken out.

Most likely. Although there were the time travels in: The Naked Time, Assignment:Earth, and Tomorrow is Yesterday.

No damage resulted from Tomorrow is Yesterday. They hit the reset button on the things when they sent the pilot of the jet back to the moment they were spotted. As far as any note in history, their "appearance" was just a blip among the plethora of "UFO sightings" of the time.

Also, don't forget The City on the Edge of Forever.
 
How could I forget CotEoF? But that one was more of a correction in time, even though Bones caused the time issue to begin with. But as long as there does not seem to be permanent harm, Temporal Investigations generally overlooks temporal incursions. That's how Capt. Sisko got off the hook.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…