- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 5,967
- Reaction score
- 1,530
- Location
- Somewhere in Dixie
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
“I would love to see your studies that show that gay parents do less well than strait parents and that a mommy and daddy is better than two mommies or daddies. I will show you mine if you show me yours.” - Redress
“The evaluation looks at how each study carries out six key research tasks: (1) formulating a hypothesis and research design; (2) controlling for unrelated effects; (3) measuring concepts (bias, reliability and validity); (4) sampling; (5) statistical testing; and (6) addressing the problem of false negatives (statistical power)…. Lerner and Nagai found at least one fatal research flaw in all forty-nine studies. As a result, they conclude that no generalizations can reliably be made based on any of these studies. For these reasons the studies are no basis for good science or good public policy.”
The Marriage Law Project at The Catholic University of America
Also consider:
http://www.christian.org.uk/pdfpublications/childrenastrophies.pdf
Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk
The following is my letter which told the truth about homosexual parenting, (reference a search of any objective reporting of
Homosexual Parenting
Timothy J. Dailey Ph.D. -- Homosexual Parenting: Placing children at risk
Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence - Conservapedia
Is Homosexuality Healthy?
The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Why Allowing Same-Sex Marriage Would Be Disastrous For America. Numerous Scientific Studies Cited.
There is a helluva lot more but this got pretty boring pretty quick but it should keep you busy for a minute.
“And again with the diversions. Compare breakup rates of those not married to those who are just as one example.” - Redress
Uh…my comment was about divorce rates…unmarried couples don’t get divorced…get it?
“I would love to see your studies that show that gay parents do less well than strait parents and that a mommy and daddy is better than two mommies or daddies. I will show you mine if you show me yours.” - Redress
“The evaluation looks at how each study carries out six key research tasks: (1) formulating a hypothesis and research design; (2) controlling for unrelated effects; (3) measuring concepts (bias, reliability and validity); (4) sampling; (5) statistical testing; and (6) addressing the problem of false negatives (statistical power)…. Lerner and Nagai found at least one fatal research flaw in all forty-nine studies. As a result, they conclude that no generalizations can reliably be made based on any of these studies. For these reasons the studies are no basis for good science or good public policy.”
The Marriage Law Project at The Catholic University of America
Also consider:
http://www.christian.org.uk/pdfpublications/childrenastrophies.pdf
Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk
The following is my letter which told the truth about homosexual parenting, (reference a search of any objective reporting of
Homosexual Parenting
Timothy J. Dailey Ph.D. -- Homosexual Parenting: Placing children at risk
Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence - Conservapedia
Is Homosexuality Healthy?
The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Why Allowing Same-Sex Marriage Would Be Disastrous For America. Numerous Scientific Studies Cited.
There is a helluva lot more but this got pretty boring pretty quick but it should keep you busy for a minute.
“And again with the diversions. Compare breakup rates of those not married to those who are just as one example.” - Redress
Uh…my comment was about divorce rates…unmarried couples don’t get divorced…get it?
“I would love to see your studies that show that gay parents do less well than strait parents and that a mommy and daddy is better than two mommies or daddies. I will show you mine if you show me yours.” - Redress
“The evaluation looks at how each study carries out six key research tasks: (1) formulating a hypothesis and research design; (2) controlling for unrelated effects; (3) measuring concepts (bias, reliability and validity); (4) sampling; (5) statistical testing; and (6) addressing the problem of false negatives (statistical power)…. Lerner and Nagai found at least one fatal research flaw in all forty-nine studies. As a result, they conclude that no generalizations can reliably be made based on any of these studies. For these reasons the studies are no basis for good science or good public policy.”
The Marriage Law Project at The Catholic University of America
Also consider:
http://www.christian.org.uk/pdfpublications/childrenastrophies.pdf
Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk
The following is my letter which told the truth about homosexual parenting, (reference a search of any objective reporting of
Homosexual Parenting
Timothy J. Dailey Ph.D. -- Homosexual Parenting: Placing children at risk
Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence - Conservapedia
Is Homosexuality Healthy?
The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
Why Allowing Same-Sex Marriage Would Be Disastrous For America. Numerous Scientific Studies Cited.
There is a helluva lot more but this got pretty boring pretty quick but it should keep you busy for a minute.
“And again with the diversions. Compare breakup rates of those not married to those who are just as one example.” - Redress
Uh…my comment was about divorce rates…unmarried couples don’t get divorced…get it?
Well sourced posts will be casually dismissed.
This should be a maxim or 'law' of some kind.
It's why I generally don't bother.
Edit:
Oh, there is, Rule 11: All your carefully picked arguments can easily be ignored :lol: My bad, I totaly forgot :doh
File:Rulesoftheinternet.jpg - Oh Internet
Well, if someone on the internet said it, it must be true!!!! :roll:
Look, child! You do not skim a few articles and dimsiss them because you don't like the sources. You examine them and debunk the argument. That's how adults do it!
Well sourced posts will be casually dismissed.
This should be a maxim or 'law' of some kind.
It's why I generally don't bother.
Edit:
Oh, there is, Rule 11: All your carefully picked arguments can easily be ignored :lol: My bad, I totaly forgot :doh
File:Rulesoftheinternet.jpg - Oh Internet
I dont claim to be a bible expert but from my research homosexual behavior is mentioned six times. Being drunk, as a sin, is mentioned hundreds. By percentages that means we should have a few hundred "National Organization for Sobriety" rallies for each one against Gays. Guess its easy when you can pick which sins YOU dont like.
Jerry. Stop being such a monumental coward, and tell me what the hell you're talking about. I was talking about the Constitution. Please tell me what the **** you're talking about. If I think you're right, I will tell you as much. If I think you're wrong, I'll tell you that, as well. Either your idea will stand up to criticism or it won't. But we won't have an answer to that until you actually tell me what in the name of **** you are talking about.
In June 2011, the Marriage Equality Act, another bill to legalize same-sex marriage in New York, was passed by the state Assembly. In the Republican-controlled Senate, three Democrats and two Republicans who had voted against the 2009 bill indicated their support for legalizing same-sex marriage. On June 24, the bill was passed in the New York Senate by a 33–29 vote; 29 Democrats and four Republicans voted in favor.[5] The Gotham Gazette reported that the Senate rules were changed by the Democratic conference in a backroom agreement before the day's session to prevent Democrat Ruben Diaz, Sr., an opponent of same-sex marriage, from motioning to lay the bill aside for debate; the rules were changed again during the vote to ensure it would conclude in time to make the 11 pm EDT newscasts.[37]
You probably don't live a Christian lifestyle, which is why you can so easily dismiss Christian principles.
It's nothing a simply Wiki can't tell you, so stop being so ****ing lazy:
Same-sex marriage in New York - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lawsuits are pending because the rules were broken to pass the bill. The law is illegitimate, regardless of whether one supports ssm or not.
All this talk of natural rights and what marriage has always been etc is fine academically, but irrelevant to this piece of legislation.
Yes, I personally oppose SSM, but overriding that opinion is the reality that marriage is a State issue as per the 10th Amendment as it's not 'specifically enumerated' in the Constitution. IMO if NY wants to allow SSM, that's their business. Marriage is a state issue, what they do in their house, is in their house. I wasn't planning on moving back to NY anyway, for unrelated reasons.
However, whatever NY decides to do regarding SSM, it needs to do legitimately. In this case, it did not, and that's the problem.
Иосиф Сталин;1059684169 said:You don't understand because you grew up amidst that multicultural propaganda that gays are OK, minorities should be given preference all the time, and every citizen should own a gun.
And why should they be allowed to marry? Who says they can? Who says two men can marry each other? That is disgusting. In the future, anybody who doesn't approve of gay marriage or doesn't act gay is going to be persecuted.
Don't forget that. Only one mentality can prevail. It's either them or us. We cannot co-exist, because they want to destroy normal people. You have to become like them, if you are to progress in the future world. Well, not under my watch. I'm not becoming another gay. Quit dreaming about all those happy-end movies. This is not Hollywood. This is real life.
We can already witness this in colleges, where a certain degree of gayness makes you cool and appreciated, whereas if you don't tolerate that behavior you're immediately marginalized.
Yeah, I'm watching you, buddies. This is not MTV.
Terrible argument.
You probably don't live a Christian lifestyle, which is why you can so easily dismiss Christian principles.
It's nothing a simply Wiki can't tell you, so stop being so ****ing lazy:
Same-sex marriage in New York - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lawsuits are pending because the rules were broken to pass the bill. The law is illegitimate, regardless of whether one supports ssm or not.
All this talk of natural rights and what marriage has always been etc is fine academically, but irrelevant to this piece of legislation.
Yes, I personally oppose SSM, but overriding that opinion is the reality that marriage is a State issue as per the 10th Amendment as it's not 'specifically enumerated' in the Constitution. IMO if NY wants to allow SSM, that's their business. Marriage is a state issue, what they do in their house, is in their house. I wasn't planning on moving back to NY anyway, for unrelated reasons.
However, whatever NY decides to do regarding SSM, it needs to do legitimately. In this case, it did not, and that's the problem.
I don't see anything about the rules being broken. It says the rules were changed.
It may be that the rules were changed using an illegal/inappropriate manner, but your link offers no proof of that
It wasn't supposed to be. It's Wiki. It's only good for giving you a basic idea of what I was talking about.
Terrible argument.
You probably don't live a Christian lifestyle, which is why you can so easily dismiss Christian principles.
Nice to see such solid proof that something was amiss
It's nothing a simply Wiki can't tell you, so stop being so ****ing lazy:
Same-sex marriage in New York - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lawsuits are pending because the rules were broken to pass the bill. The law is illegitimate, regardless of whether one supports ssm or not.
All this talk of natural rights and what marriage has always been etc is fine academically, but irrelevant to this piece of legislation.
Yes, I personally oppose SSM, but overriding that opinion is the reality that marriage is a State issue as per the 10th Amendment as it's not 'specifically enumerated' in the Constitution. IMO if NY wants to allow SSM, that's their business. Marriage is a state issue, what they do in their house, is in their house. I wasn't planning on moving back to NY anyway, for unrelated reasons.
However, whatever NY decides to do regarding SSM, it needs to do legitimately. In this case, it did not, and that's the problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?