Another Palin Lie: She COULD Have Stopped "Road To Nowhere"!

[Lerxst]

You want desert? ROTFLMAO...

And you are reduced to this with one post.


Got my bean pie ready yet?

Damn, I'd say she's one of the most fiscally reposible politicians I've ever seen.

You were saying? :roll:

 

[ADK_Forever]

ooops, you're right.

it says:


so I should have said "up to $1 million" of money she would have had to screw the AK taxpayers out of. Which of course changes nothing. The burden is still on you guys to justify why a Governor should screw her constituents out of tax money for what could only be her own personal political gain.

That's also according to that guy, who has absolutely no clue. He's just posting an opinion on a website. Somebody, somewhere, is probably using our posts as "facts" to try and make their own point. It is meaningless.

You and your twin are getting tedious.

Not to get anal, too much anyway but, the article says, "less than $1 million in recoverable costs". "Less than". Not "up to" or "a minimum" or "a million plus". LESS THAN! Got it?

Meaningless? It sure made an impression on you two. Just because you two rocket scientists don't like the web site, because it supplies facts against your team, doesn't mean they aren't facts.

Again, if you think any of the facts on KOS are not true then... show me your proof or sit and spin.

 

[GottaHurt]

And you are reduced to this with one post.


Got my bean pie ready yet?



You were saying? :roll:

Mines a typo..lol...

Yours is the difference between a delectable delight, or a sea of sand.

Put you bullet back in your pocket Barney, before Andy takes it, and your gun away.

You head over to Aunt Bea's, she's got your mac-n-cheese and your sippy cup.
If you're a clean plater, maybe she'll get you a big bowl of sand ala mode. :lamo

 

[Panther]

You and your twin are getting tedious.

Not to get anal, too much anyway but, the article says, "less than $1 million in recoverable costs". "Less than". Not "up to" or "a minimum" or "a million plus". LESS THAN! Got it?

Meaningless? It sure made an impression on you two. Just because you two rocket scientists don't like the web site, because it supplies facts against your team, doesn't mean they aren't facts.

Again, if you think any of the facts on KOS are not true then... show me your proof or sit and spin.

First of all, there is no difference between "less than a million" and "up to a million". If the moron wrote less than a million, and really meant $35.00, he loses any credibility.

Second, rather than parse semantics - especially when you are flat out wrong about the definition of the terms you object to - why don't you give me the amount of money that you feel is OK for Gov. Palin to have saddled the AK taxpayers with in order to override the federal government's wasteful spending proposal for the road? Is $5 million all right? $800K, $100K, $0.50? Unless you can answer that, then there is nothing to debate. The linked article can't support its own conclusions, or the topic title, if you refuse to even discuss the only fact that can determine whether or not she made the fiscally responsible decision.

Second, these aren't "facts" presented. This is just some internet moron (like you and I) posting his own partisan opinions (like you and I). Regardless of that, my comments are focused on his own admitted "fact" of the cost to AK taxpayers. You want us to respond to the article, yet even you want to disregard the parts of this political opinion that you can't defend. So basically, you are just looking for everyone to agree with the partisan opinion that she is somehow to be considered dishonest - but don't want to debate the underlying "facts" that are necessary to reach that wrong opinion.

Forgive me for not just accepting the posters conclusion when his underlying explanation is flawed. Especially a poster who probably has to type his radical propaganda with one hand because his other hand is pleasuring himself while he's staring at the picture of a topless Lenin that's sitting on top of the box of government cheese in the corner of the one room he and 4 other squatters share. :roll:

 

[Lerxst]

First of all, there is no difference between "less than a million" and "up to a million". If the moron wrote less than a million, and really meant $35.00, he loses any credibility.

Second, rather than parse semantics - especially when you are flat out wrong about the definition of the terms you object to - why don't you give me the amount of money that you feel is OK for Gov. Palin to have saddled the AK taxpayers with in order to override the federal government's wasteful spending proposal for the road? Is $5 million all right? $800K, $100K, $0.50? Unless you can answer that, then there is nothing to debate. The linked article can't support its own conclusions, or the topic title, if you refuse to even discuss the only fact that can determine whether or not she made the fiscally responsible decision.

Second, these aren't "facts" presented. This is just some internet moron (like you and I) posting his own partisan opinions (like you and I). Regardless of that, my comments are focused on his own admitted "fact" of the cost to AK taxpayers. You want us to respond to the article, yet even you want to disregard the parts of this political opinion that you can't defend. So basically, you are just looking for everyone to agree with the partisan opinion that she is somehow to be considered dishonest - but don't want to debate the underlying "facts" that are necessary to reach that wrong opinion.

Forgive me for not just accepting the posters conclusion when his underlying explanation is flawed. Especially a poster who probably has to type his radical propaganda with one hand because his other hand is pleasuring himself while he's staring at the picture of a topless Lenin that's sitting on top of the box of government cheese in the corner of the one room he and 4 other squatters share. :roll:

Because of the many millions of federal earmark dollars that came into the state which were wasteful, the tax payers in Alaska didn't contribute any correct? The bottom line is that Palin took a position, and some of the defense to that position is that the "deal was done" and there was "nothing she could do about it." Yet the evidence clearly shows that is simply not true. She chose to keep the money and chose how it would be spent.

That's all this is really about. A small white lie on the part of the good Governor and her crew.

And you are wrong about the provisions in that article not being "facts." They were. He didn't make those up himself. He pulled them directly from official sources and posted them.

 

[Panther]

And you are wrong about the provisions in that article not being "facts." They were. He didn't make those up himself. He pulled them directly from official sources and posted them.

Yet you all still chose to completely ignore the most important fact of all.

The fact that the "deal was done" was stated in the article. It was done, and had to be undone by the Governor. And undoing the deal came with a price tag.

All stated by the poster, and all still disputed in this thread by the same people whining about people ignoring the posters claims. :shock:

 

[Lerxst]

Mines a typo..lol...

So I take it that you are still a bit too intimidated to actually argue the case? Yeah, you don't need to answer that. We already know the answer.

 

[Panther]

Pot, meet kettle.

 

[Lerxst]

Yet you all still chose to completely ignore the most important fact of all.

The fact that the "deal was done" was stated in the article. It was done, and had to be undone by the Governor. And undoing the deal came with a price tag.

All stated by the poster, and all still disputed in this thread by the same people whining about people ignoring the posters claims. :shock:

I'm not ignoring that. What did I post earlier? That it came with a price was not the issue. The lie that was propagated by the Palin camp was the issue. It's like you people always do when McCain is called on something, you try to deflect the issue (but but but Obama said) rather than confront it.

"Oh we have to take this twenty some odd million dollars in what we believe to be wasted federal dollars cause it might cost us some money to do the right thing and turn it back over....so we'll just keep the twenty some million dollars of waste and cost everyone else, as well as ourselves because we realize that federal tax money came from Alaska too!"

Don't think defending this scores any points.

 

[Lerxst]

Pot, meet kettle.

Bull****, I actually debate the issue. He trolls. If you think otherwise I'll just start calling you Sarah Palin given your sharp attention to detail.

:roll:

 

[Panther]

"Oh we have to take this twenty some odd million dollars in what we believe to be wasted federal dollars cause it might cost us some money to do the right thing and turn it back over....so we'll just keep the twenty some million dollars of waste and cost everyone else, as well as ourselves because we realize that federal tax money came from Alaska too!"

There are 300+ million people in the US that the federal government can tap for federal taxes.

There are 600K+ people in AK.

You're being intellectually dishonest to suggest that just because AK is in the US that the burden on AK taxpayers is equivalent. It isn't and that's exactly what makes this call the fiscally correct call for a Gov. to make.

If your city decided to spend 10K to repave your driveway that you had just paid to repave 6 months ago. Would you let them do it if the only legal alternative was to pay a $1500 cancellation fee? Does the fact that you also pay city taxes mean that you should just suck it up for the good of the city since either way you will have to pay something anyway?

Of course not. And those who disagree are the partisan ones trying to "deflect the issue" because they don't have the intellectual honesty, or capacity, to concede that every single negative about the opposing candidate must not necessarily be true and have to be defended "to the death".

IOW, there's plenty about Palin that can rightfully be debated as a cause for concern, or an example of politics trumping the truth. This "Road to Nowhere" is not one of them.

 

[Lerxst]

There are 300+ million people in the US that the federal government can tap for federal taxes.

There are 600K+ people in AK.

You're being intellectually dishonest to suggest that just because AK is in the US that the burden on AK taxpayers is equivalent. It isn't and that's exactly what makes this call the fiscally correct call for a Gov. to make.

Lol...what? The entire issue here is her persona as a waste reformer! Which is bull****. Screw everyone else! We'll take their money even if it is wasteful! Don't play that line with me please. Intellectually dishonest? Not on my part, check your own posts.

If your city decided to spend 10K to repave your driveway that you had just paid to repave 6 months ago. Would you let them do it if the only legal alternative was to pay a $1500 cancellation fee? Does the fact that you also pay city taxes mean that you should just suck it up for the good of the city since either way you will have to pay something anyway?

Red herring and not even remotely the same. How much would the penalty have been? Get that information, post it, and then make your analogy.

IOW, there's plenty about Palin that can rightfully be debated as a cause for concern, or an example of politics trumping the truth. This "Road to Nowhere" is not one of them.

You'll rail on partisanship and then post this? Dismissing the bridge to nowhere lie she continually proliferates about herself. Right.

Have fun with that.

 

[Panther]

You've proven my point exactly.

Keep deflecting. I'll move on to another topic that has more than one or two radicals clinging to an indefensible partisan position that defies all facts, including the facts that they themselves posted.

 

[GottaHurt]

So I take it that you are still a bit too intimidated to actually argue the case? Yeah, you don't need to answer that. We already know the answer.

Intimidated by you? In your wildest dreams. Panther has handed you and your other BOZO buddy your asses in this thread, so why should I pile on?

Again, Lerxst The Black Knight® doesn't know when he's defeated.

You'd think after a half a dozen or so people point out that you can't grasp the fact that you've had your ass kicked, you'd finally catch on.

It's easy to understand why you have so many domestic issues. :doh

 

[Lerxst]

You've proven my point exactly.

Keep deflecting. I'll move on to another topic that has more than one or two radicals clinging to an indefensible partisan position that defies all facts, including the facts that they themselves posted.

And how did I deflect? Don't make empty claims here without substantiating them. Show where I deflected. I've addressed your valid issues. You have ignored mine for the most part. I have shown you how you did that.

I'll summarize for you ONE more time. The issue is Palin being dishonest in her representation as a waste reformer. She is not. She furthered this image by pushing this nonsense that she had no choice but to accept the money and move on. That was a lie. She could have broken the contract and return the money. The facts contained with the cited article support this. You of course don't acknowledge them. Why? What is so scary?

Now your argument here is that it would have had a price to the Alaskan people. I asked you...how much? What was the price? If you are going to use this argument, and go so far as to make an analogy around it, at least research it a little bit so I can better judge the analogy you are making. At this point your analogy is up in the air. If you want me to discuss it with you, make it fit. Then I will.

The only partisan running away here is you.

 

[Lerxst]

Intimidated by you? In your wildest dreams. Panther has handed you and your other BOZO buddy your asses in this thread, so why should I pile on?

Again, Lerxst The Black Knight® doesn't know when he's defeated.

You'd think after a half a dozen or so people point out that you can't grasp the fact that you've had your ass kicked, you'd finally catch on.

It's easy to understand why you have so many domestic issues. :doh

In other words, you are too intimidated to argue the facts. Fine, this is your strong suit. That and stocking the burger line at the White Castle you call home.

G-G-G-GottaHurt!!!! YEAH!!!!!

 

[GottaHurt]

In other words, you are too intimidated to argue the facts. Fine, this is your strong suit. That and stocking the burger line at the White Castle you call home.

G-G-G-GottaHurt!!!! YEAH!!!!!

Everyone walks away snickering, at Lerxst The Black Knight®, as he lay's hopelessly on the ground, whimpering, and ranting on, in the thread to nowhere...

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

Ok, here's your proof that Palin is more of a pathological liar than a VP candidate:

Daily Kos: More McCain/Palin Lies - The Road To Nowhere Did Not Have To Be Built.

Read it yourself. Note all the discrepancies from Palin's claims.

We should maybe start a thread listing all of her lies. :roll:

again using the daily kooks as a source and whining about an ap story in fox news is rather hypocritical of you, no? :lol:

 

[Lerxst]

Everyone walks away snickering, at Lerxst The Black Knight®, as he lay's hopelessly on the ground, whimpering, and ranting on, in the thread to nowhere...

Look around sport...there is no everybody. There's only you. And given the fact that you only have about two cheerleaders on this entire forum, I'd say you don't count for a whole lot. I'm still here waiting for you to cover the yellow streak down your back and argue the points with me.

 

[GottaHurt]

Look around sport...there is no everybody.

You're right, it's everyone.

And given the fact that you only have about two cheerleaders on this entire forum

I need no cheerleaders. You're the one who needs a support group.

I'd say you don't count for a whole lot.

You also said I worked for White Castle. No White Castle's in Florida.

Say what you will Lerxst The Black Knight®, everyone is snickering.

I'm still here waiting for you to cover the yellow streak down your back and argue the points with me.

WHAT!?! No Challenge!?!

No one wants to engage you Lerxst The Black Knight®, you know not, when you are in defeat.

You're so desperate for a debate now, you're arguing some out of date never was topic from the DailyKOS. :lamo

 

[Lerxst]

You're right, it's everyone.



I need no cheerleaders. You're the one who needs a support group.



You also said I worked for White Castle. No White Castle's in Florida.

Say what you will Lerxst The Black Knight®, everyone is snickering.



WHAT!?! No Challenge!?!

No one wants to engage you Lerxst The Black Knight®, you know not, when you are in defeat.

You're so desperate for a debate now, you're arguing some out of date never was topic from the DailyKOS. :lamo

Translation: "I can't argue the fact here, so I'll just blather and roll on the floor."

I'm done with you chump.

 

[American]

Palin will never be VP.

She wasted $26 mil of U.S. taxpayers' money. And that's ok with you.
It really is that simple, for those who are open to the truth.

I won't be surprised if she somehow bows out before the election.

She won't. But feel free to hold your breath.

 

[GottaHurt]

Translation: "I can't argue the fact here, so I'll just blather and roll on the floor."

Oh no, not The Lerxst Whimper®. I've stated previously, I don't argue blogs. Obviously defending obscure blogs with your new running buddy is all you have left.

I'm done with you chump.

It's with an "A", it's Champ

Just like the trouble you had distinguishing between a sea of sand or a delectable delight. :doh