- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Oh, common on, only little people are required to tell the truth.
Plus, even if she did it, it was so totally harmless.
You see, the Russians and the Chinese would never ever expect that an American Secretary of State could be so reckless and so moronic as to keep classified stuff in her kitchen between a toaster and a blender. For this kind of stunt, in China you get a bullet after a brief trial. In Russia - you mysteriously eat some radioactive crap that makes your hair fall out before you croak.
Because of that very logical assumption on their part, their spies would never look there, so what is the problem?
Today, we Bulgarians present a fine example of what it is to exist under a lid which we cannot lift and which we no longer believe someone else can lift...And the unending slogan which millions of loudspeakers blare out is that everyone is fighting for the happiness of the others. Every word spoken under the lid constantly changes its meaning. Lies and truths swap their values with the frequency of an alternating current...We have seen how personality vanishes, how individuality is destroyed, how the spiritual life of a whole people is corrupted in order to turn them into a listless flock of sheep. We have seen so many of those demonstrations which humiliate human dignity, where normal people are expected to applaud some paltry mediocrity who has proclaimed himself a demi-god and condescendingly waves to them from the heights of his police inviolability...
— Georgi Markov describing life under a totalitarian regime in The Truth that Killed
Wake me when charges are actually filed.
Wake me when charges are actually filed.
In England you'll feel the sting of an umbrella. Are you saying that dissidents should be silenced?
Wake me when charges are actually filed.
Hot diggity dog! That's quite the bombshell there.
"(C) Purpose of Call: to offer condolences on the passing of President Mukharika and congratulate President Banda on her recent swearing in."
That condolence call information at 10:37 PM on Easter Sunday evening with a (C)
A C! (see?) is sure to do her in. Bank on it connies.
Let's see now...where did it originate? Oh, Dept. of State - her aide deemed it confidential - likely because of personal information or things like phone numbers, in that it say's Secretary's Call Sheet.
There's a pretty good clue there.
Because it originated at State, SOS had the power to declassify it.
There's also the fact that her aide could have just have easily been sent that information to her, marked as confidential as regular snail mail.
Yep (something I learned a few weeks ago to my surprise) just regular First Class Mail. Classified information marked "'confidential" via a First class stamp in a No. 10 envelope. Mighty secure, eh?
But you go get em, tigers. Crack your new whip. It's sure to be a slayer.
This time.
This time.
For sure.
Weird.So does that mean I can store all of my business mail at home in a box on my lawn? :lol:
Nope.Her emails were hacked, weren't they?
Weird.
Nope.
Then why was this guy extradited, charged and prosecuted?
Romanian hacker who says he breached Clinton server finalizing plea deal | Fox News
Hot diggity dog! That's quite the bombshell there.
"(C) Purpose of Call: to offer condolences on the passing of President Mukharika and congratulate President Banda on her recent swearing in."
That condolence call information at 10:37 PM on Easter Sunday evening with a (C)
A C! (see?) is sure to do her in. Bank on it connies.
Let's see now...where did it originate? Oh, Dept. of State - her aide deemed it confidential - likely because of personal information or things like phone numbers, in that it say's Secretary's Call Sheet.
There's a pretty good clue there.
Because it originated at State, SOS had the power to declassify it.
There's also the fact that her aide could have just have easily been sent that information to her, marked as confidential as regular snail mail.
Yep (something I learned a few weeks ago to my surprise) just regular First Class Mail. Classified information marked "'confidential" via a First class stamp in a No. 10 envelope. Mighty secure, eh?
But you go get em, tigers. Crack your new whip. It's sure to be a slayer.
This time.
This time.
For sure.
You have it all figured out huh?
Then why don't you tell me what was contained in that "Marked as Classified" email received by Hillary Clinton through her private, in-home email server?
Oops, I forgot that you can't answer that. That's because the State Department redacted the entire email (other than those few lines) and still deems it's contents just as classified in 2016, as it was back in 2012 when Hillary Clinton received it.
So what should we all believe?
The State Department, who marked it classified in 2012 and still consider it classified today?
Or should we believe that it isn't classified based on what you gleaned from the redacted, blank pages you downloaded?
And btw, you can obfuscate and create all the fairy tale scenarios you like, but you will never, ever, be able to change the fact that when Hillary Clinton said over and over, and over again, that she never received any emails that were marked classified, it was a calculated, bold faced lie created to fool supporters just like you. Hillary really has you pegged too, because here you are defending her while her lies stare you right in the face.
.
Without a filter which parses email for tags marking emails classified, it is statistically improbable that either the state's server or Clinton's server could have blocked the transmission of classified information.
In fact, it should make sense that Hillary Clinton lied to "protect" her aides.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?