- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 49,651
- Reaction score
- 55,265
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Your first mistake is in #1: An indictment can't happen without evidence.
Sure, there are procedures that can be difficult (and sometimes nearly impossible) to follow, but no prosecutor will allow an indictment to be made without actual evidence. Now Mueller might withhold that evidence to be provided for discovery for another reason...but there is evidence.
You just don't want to believe there's evidence because you know it's all going to eventually end up pointing where the buck's supposed to stop.
Well, I suppose there is evidence that Russians, posing as Americans, made Facebook and Twitter posts promoting and disparaging various candidates. There is no reason one can't indict based on that but it's a whole different kettle of fish to turn that into a conviction on defrauding the United States, money laundering or aggravated identity theft.