Every world power in history was built on the backs of slavery. Stop pretending America invented it. It was ugly, it was abolished, and now your pathetic party tries with all its might to keep the racial tensions churning, a la Trayvon Martin.
Obama Campaign Runs From Strategist's Insult On Ann Romney | Fox News
A royal "stepping on your crank moment" for the Obama folks?
Yes, and I didn't create one.
At some point, we have to stop digging this hole. And Obama only knows the big government way, which is to keep digging with other people's shovels until we run out of shovels.
Personally, I think Obama did the honorable thing by declaring not only that professional Mothers deserve respect, but that the family is off limits.
I would say that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
He and Bobby Petrino. Must have something to do with Arkansas.
Because that means Michelle Obama can't be criticized no matter what she says.
Because that means Michelle Obama can't be criticized no matter what she says.
There's a difference between legitimate criticism and a substanceless personal attack.
Saying "I have a problem with what Michelle is doing" is different from saying "She's an ugly horse-faced fat bitch with a huge donk."
A)
I'm very much unlike you. I do not belong, nor do I pledge allegiance to any political party in this country, or any other for that matter.
B)
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of my Country, the Declaration of Independents upon which it was founded, and the resultant Constitution that binds it and holds it together, despite the attempts of many to separate it.
C)
The factoid that America did not usher into the world the concept of Slavery, did not make the Institution of American Slavery, any less immoral than it was. The fact that Slavery was abolished in the United States, makes its legacy no less impacting on the current American Psyche today. And, your post is a prime example of that sad, sorry, and awfully pitiful fact. Nor, did it make George Washington, a moral agent of honor, decency and integrity.
Those are the facts - like them, or not.
Why should Michelle Obama be fair game, but not Ann Romney?
Because that means Michelle Obama can't be criticized no matter what she says.
Or small sample sizes.
As I said earlier in this thread, they should both be fair game.
Yeah, the comment is valid if you take it for what it obviously meant to show - that Mrs. Romney hasn't had to juggle things most mothers have to which is working a job, particularly while raising children. However, if you want to make a big deal out of the comment, then you can latch onto the "but stay at home moms" work argument which completely misses the intent of the statement.
*FTR, I get a little perturbed when stay-at-home moms get self-righteous about doing a lot of work. I understand it's work to raise children, but it's even more work to raise children and have a job outside of the home so when people try to act like homemaking is the same level of work as full time job + raising kids, I think it's ridiculous.
Well, I disagree, I don't think either of them are fair game. Nothing they do has much bearing on how well their husbands either have been, or will be, President.
At least you're consistent, so I can respect that.
I didn't say it wasn't smart. I pointed out how easily people fall for the faux outrage of politicians. I can't believe how many people are earnestly defending Mrs. Romney as if she gives a damn about this other than to make some money.
Yeah, the comment is valid if you take it for what it obviously meant to show - that Mrs. Romney hasn't had to juggle things most mothers have to which is working a job, particularly while raising children. However, if you want to make a big deal out of the comment, then you can latch onto the "but stay at home moms" work argument which completely misses the intent of the statement.
*FTR, I get a little perturbed when stay-at-home moms get self-righteous about doing a lot of work. I understand it's work to raise children, but it's even more work to raise children and have a job outside of the home so when people try to act like homemaking is the same level of work as full time job + raising kids, I think it's ridiculous.
Michelle Obumble is fair game. She has been an advocate of her husband's failed administration. Now, the kids are off limits. I was PISSED when people made fun of Chelsea Clinton; SS agents I know always said she was a delightful and polite young lady. And while she was not beautiful (hardly her fault) she was always neat and she was in great shape.
They're on the campaign trails with their husbands. Anyone on the campaign trail is open for criticism (except children, of course).
Am I in the minority for thinking Chelsea Clinton is at least somewhat attractive?
Actually, in this case, she's being criticized for her husband's attempt to make her look like the everyday woman when she isn't. If you or your candidate husband presents an image of yourself, then I think people have the right to criticize that image if they think it's a lie. For example, MO has taken on healthy living as her cause and thus presents herself as a healthy person. If she were 300 pounds, then I think it would be reasonable for people to question her image.I don't think Madame Obama can be criticized for how she lived her life and the choices she made. What she says publicly is a different matter, the same holds true for Mrs. Romney. She isn't being criticized (in this instance) for what she has said, but rather for the perfectly honorable choices she has made.
Actually, in this case, she's being criticized for her husband's attempt to make her look like the everyday woman when she isn't. If you or your candidate husband presents an image of yourself, then I think people have the right to criticize that image if they think it's a lie. For example, MO has taken on healthy living as her cause and thus presents herself as a healthy person. If she were 300 pounds, then I think it would be reasonable for people to question her image.
Enola, every Presidential family is rich and unlike the average American.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?