Mixed View
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
mistermain said:I know some of my fellow conservatives will grill me for this, but I must say that Ann Coulter is a liability to all right wingers. She is everything that the liberals claim is wrong with conservatives. Coulter is arrogant, stuck up, condescending, and overall a bitch. She gives a black eye to all conservatives, and is a poor representative of us.
AlbqOwl said:Yeah that's a nice hatchet job on her, all taken out of context of course, and your remarks are personally directed (at Ann) without addressing my point that she is a competent journalist and Michael Moore is not. Both of their speaking styles and adjectives they use are sometimes out of line, yes. But whatever floats your boat. I don't see any constructive purpose of continuing the discussion, but it has been interesting.
tr1414 said:You seem to have a problem with a women who tells it like it is or just speaks her mind. Why is that.... never mind I don't want to know
AlbqOwl said:Of course you can verify that these are actual Ann Coulter quotes? There are an awful lot of bogus Ann Coulter quote sites out there.
tr1414 said:You seem to have a problem with a women who tells it like it is or just speaks her mind. Why is that.... never mind I don't want to know
satanloveslibs said:She's very witty and smart. She does make great points, but they all seem the same to me in all her books. "Bomb France" and "Liberals are always wrong! Hate Them!!!!" She is sometimes bad representation.
kal-el said:Yeah ok, that **** about Limbaugh being "factually correct" all the time is just stupid. The reason people think that is because nobody bothers to check. If you get online though, there are watchdog sites that keep track of the BS, and of course the Franken show, which is infotainment as well but infinately less stupid and at least honest about its political slant. All the conservative mouthpieces present themselves as non-biased or centrist. Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Coulter, Savage, all of them, but gee whiz, what do you know, their entire fan base is conservative and so is nearly every comment out of their mouths. Yep, they definately don't have a conservative agenda . . . Anybody that buys that will buy anything these guys say. Why? Like I said before, it makes them feel good that some guy on the radio agrees with them. Nothing more, nothing less.
MrFungus420 said:Just one question. When has Rush ever claimed to be anything other than conservative? That's his entire basis. He's a conservative countering the liberals, plain and simple.
kal-el said:True that, but even the likes of opposite Micheal Moore, isn't even close to being hypocritical like good ole Rush is. The fact remains that Limbaugh dosen't give a **** about his conservative audience, they're just a meal ticket for this bloated, pill-popping, hypocritical media enterpriser.
aquapub said:She encourages conservatives to be unapologetically conservative.
She has a brilliant legal mind.
She is painfully accurate about many things.
Example: When Bill Mahr had one of his 4-on-1, interruption-fest gangbangs against Coulter about Bush not jumping up and frightening school kids when he was told about 9/11, she said, "My problem with that whole thing was that we had a president reading to a bunch of school kids in the first place. I'm not the one who gave women the right to vote."
He WAS reading to school kids to pander to the female vote-which was her point. Presidents are supposed to execute laws, defend the country...not fix education systems.
She understands the Constitution-THAT is what makes her seem so controversial.
Yes, she is hostile to the left. Someone should be. The difference between her and, say, James Carville, is that she has substance and logic behind her points. I largely support her work.
Also, as part of that academic award-winning research I did on liberal media bias, I read Al Franken and Eric Alterman. They both spend almost all their time attacking OPINION JOURNALISTS instead of supposedly OBJECTIVE JOURNALISTS like, say, Katie Couric. But that's really a side point. Franken particularly attacks Coulter, and quite harshly, so I checked everything Franken wrote about Coulter in his newest book against Lexis Nexis and vice versa. Guess what?
I spent forty pages citing one egregious distortion/flat out lie of Franken's after another. I included copies from Nexis to prove what he was pulling. As usual, the laughably petty, smear-tactic arguments against her were exactly the kind of hysterical, dishonest liberal screeching she writes about.
People need people like Coulter. She is the only one bothering to remind us of all the evidence we've seen that liberals control our media and side with every enemy this nation has.
She encourages conservatives to be unapologetically conservative.
She has a brilliant legal mind.
She is painfully accurate about many things.
Example: When Bill Mahr had one of his 4-on-1, interruption-fest gangbangs against Coulter about Bush not jumping up and frightening school kids when he was told about 9/11, she said, "My problem with that whole thing was that we had a president reading to a bunch of school kids in the first place. I'm not the one who gave women the right to vote."
He WAS reading to school kids to pander to the female vote-which was her point. Presidents are supposed to execute laws, defend the country...not fix education systems.
She understands the Constitution-THAT is what makes her seem so controversial.
Yes, she is hostile to the left. Someone should be. The difference between her and, say, James Carville, is that she has substance and logic behind her points. I largely support her work.
Also, as part of that academic award-winning research I did on liberal media bias, I read Al Franken and Eric Alterman. They both spend almost all their time attacking OPINION JOURNALISTS instead of supposedly OBJECTIVE JOURNALISTS like, say, Katie Couric. But that's really a side point. Franken particularly attacks Coulter, and quite harshly, so I checked everything Franken wrote about Coulter in his newest book against Lexis Nexis and vice versa. Guess what?
I spent forty pages citing one egregious distortion/flat out lie of Franken's after another. I included copies from Nexis to prove what he was pulling. As usual, the laughably petty, smear-tactic arguments against her were exactly the kind of hysterical, dishonest liberal screeching she writes about.
People need people like Coulter. She is the only one bothering to remind us of all the evidence we've seen that liberals control our media and side with every enemy this nation has.
aquapub said:She encourages conservatives to be unapologetically conservative.
She has a brilliant legal mind.
She is painfully accurate about many things.
Example: When Bill Mahr had one of his 4-on-1, interruption-fest gangbangs against Coulter about Bush not jumping up and frightening school kids when he was told about 9/11, she said, "My problem with that whole thing was that we had a president reading to a bunch of school kids in the first place. I'm not the one who gave women the right to vote."
He WAS reading to school kids to pander to the female vote-which was her point. Presidents are supposed to execute laws, defend the country...not fix education systems.
She understands the Constitution-THAT is what makes her seem so controversial.
Yes, she is hostile to the left. Someone should be. The difference between her and, say, James Carville, is that she has substance and logic behind her points. I largely support her work.
Also, as part of that academic award-winning research I did on liberal media bias, I read Al Franken and Eric Alterman. They both spend almost all their time attacking OPINION JOURNALISTS instead of supposedly OBJECTIVE JOURNALISTS like, say, Katie Couric. But that's really a side point. Franken particularly attacks Coulter, and quite harshly, so I checked everything Franken wrote about Coulter in his newest book against Lexis Nexis and vice versa. Guess what?
I spent forty pages citing one egregious distortion/flat out lie of Franken's after another. I included copies from Nexis to prove what he was pulling. As usual, the laughably petty, smear-tactic arguments against her were exactly the kind of hysterical, dishonest liberal screeching she writes about.
People need people like Coulter. She is the only one bothering to remind us of all the evidence we've seen that liberals control our media and side with every enemy this nation has.
Trajan Octavian Titus said:I think she's hot, I'd still do her. J.K. LMFAO
That's the best analogy yet to describe the extreme right.Originally Posted by mixedmedia:
...the closest cultural phenomena I can think of to compare them to is professional wrestlers.
tr1414 said:I guess it's cause you libs are so much smarter than conservatives.... give me a break. & this billo guy... your a real tough guy... on your keyboard. Another no life lib with a big mouth
wxcrazytwo said:Ann Coulter is as bad as the come. Everything that comes out of her mouth is a bunch of crap..
mixedmedia said:lol. and don't forget the lizards and toads.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?