Andrew settles huge payout to Virginia Giuffre

[HangLow]

The telegraph editor suggests a payout of some £12million to Giuffre with another large sum of money to a charity of her choice. It is thought around £8 million of that bill may be paid by th Queen and the remainder could come from the sale of a £17 million property in Switzerland jointly owned with Sarah Ferguson.

This is only the civil case, if a criminal case is brought she may still be required to testify. Nearly everything in Andrew's statement could have been written by Giuffre's lawyers - shame the b**stard didn't end up in prison for paedophile activity with an underage girl.

Prince Andrew: Questions over payout after settlement with Virginia Giuffre

No details of the Duke of York's payout to Virginia Giuffre have been made public.

www.bbc.co.uk

And today - Prince Charles' charity is under investigation. What a shower these two sons have been.

​

 

[Ginza]

Slagging of the victim, classy.

Making a claim to know who the victim is, based on the stories in the press, is not very clever.

She was underaged (17) and maybe he could get away with it in the UK or New York but one of the sexual encounters took place on the US Virgin Islands and there the age of consent is 18.

Er, alleged sexual encounters.

The photo was taken when she was 17 and hence Andrew committed no crime.

He is an idiot, but nothing has been proven against him.

 

[Ginza]

So what did he do wrong in a legal sense? Tell us please.

Absolutely nothing.

Although he has always been a pretentious, entitled idiot.

 

[Ginza]

Seemingly a huge payout to a woman he claims he's never met.

Read up.

He does not have the money to pay the settlement.

The Queen will be paying it to stop even more dirt sticking to the British monarchy.

She is effectively settling the case, not Andrew.

 

[Ginza]

There was an interview with Virginia Giuffre on Australian TV several years ago.

She related how she stopped working for Epstein after he sent her to Thailand to complete a course on Asian massaging as she wanted to make this her profession.

Whilst there, she met an Australian, Robert Giuffre, fell in love and moved with him back to Australia, where they married and where she now lives.

I found it quite weird how the American TV and press talk of how she "escaped" being a sex slave.

Some escape!

She has also sued Alan Dershowitz but he refused to settle.

She has made a fortune from Netflix and other media...and is now set for another big pay day.

Playing the victim has been a very lucrative "career" for her.

But is she a victim?

"Virginia Giuffre… one of the women [in the trial] testified she was 14 or 15 years old and she was brought to Jeffrey Epstein for money by Virginia Giuffre who was well over the age of consent."

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz says Virginia Giuffre could face sex charges

Alan Dershowitz claimed prosecutors behind the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking crimes could now try Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre for an alleged role in the abuse.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Ginza]

The Royals are seemingly led by an ethical woman as Queen, but the rest of them are acting like entitled, self centered morons.

I would agree when it comes to Andrew and Harry, but Prince William and Kate and some of the other Royals work extremely hard.

The institution needs to end though....and in my opinion, this should happen on the death of Queen Elizabeth.

 

[Peter King]

Making a claim to know who the victim is, based on the stories in the press, is not very clever.

She was a victim of sex trafficking and sexual abuse, those statements are beyond fact.

Er, alleged sexual encounters.

The photo was taken when she was 17 and hence Andrew committed no crime.

He is an idiot, but nothing has been proven against him.

Of course not, prince pervert stopped the process before discovery and his testifying, then he would not have been able to lie anymore. He could still be criminally prosecuted, not sure if that is going to happen but hey, at least she did not sign a non-disclosure agreement so we will get to know more about the settlement sooner rather than later.

As stated, 17 is under aged and a crime in the US virgin Islands. And I am not sure that defense of "she was 17" goes in cases of sex trafficked girls.

 

[Peter King]

I would agree when it comes to Andrew and Harry, but Prince William and Kate and some of the other Royals work extremely hard.

The institution needs to end though....and in my opinion, this should happen on the death of Queen Elizabeth.

Harry? He is one of the few with morals. His daddy now also seems to be implicated in a scandal about his charitable foundation in which some rich Saudi was given a visa into the UK and was in line for getting a Royal honor.

And hard work? Nope, they get to visit a lot of places and wave their hands, real work? Nope, but that is OK, getting ready to be king is also a job of sorts. The real hardest working royal was the queen. Now Charles has stepped into her role a bit but after waiting for the crown for that many years he can do that for his mother.

And I think Charles should get his title as king and then maybe end it. He has been waiting patiently in the wings and deserves his time as king. Not that I am a great fan of the man but if you wait that long as a crown prince, you should get the job in the end.

And maybe it is just time to radically rework the monarchy, maybe then it has a future. No political power, no Royal estates of which the family gets money. The palaces come public property and they get a yearly wage. Nothing more. And less OBE, MBE stuff. The royals need to come closer to the public, not that ridiculous distance it has now.

At least that is my opinion. And no more sitting on the throne until death, the next one (William) after Charles has to stop working at 75 at the latest and have his son take over. Royalty has to re-new itself regularly and that cannot happen if one person sits on the throne for 70 years or so.

 

[PoS]

Where on earth did you get the idea I was hating on her? You seem to be trying to protect the rich pedos... odd

Youre the one on record for bashing her and defending Andrew. Projection much?

So what did he do wrong in a legal sense? Tell us please.

Does rape mean nothing to you? I figured as much. Good job on showing your true colors, Pete.

 

[PeteEU]

Youre the one on record for bashing her and defending Andrew. Projection much?

I presented the facts. She has continually gotten large payments based of her supposed ordeal and has yet to see the inside of a court room proving any of it.

Does rape mean nothing to you? I figured as much. Good job on showing your true colors, Pete.

Tape has never been mentioned in all of this. Show us where Andrew is accused of forcing himself on her or others.

 

[code1211]

I would agree when it comes to Andrew and Harry, but Prince William and Kate and some of the other Royals work extremely hard.

The institution needs to end though....and in my opinion, this should happen on the death of Queen Elizabeth.

I am amused by the continuation of the royalty in England. I don't get it. I don't need to, though.

 

[Ginza]

Does rape mean nothing to you? I figured as much. Good job on showing your true colors, Pete.

You appear to have overlooked the fact that the girl had reached the age of consent when she alleges she had sex with Andrew.

 

[Ginza]

And hard work? Nope, they get to visit a lot of places and wave their hands, real work? Nope,

The Queen is 95 and still working, even though she is wealthy and has no need to.

She has certainly worked a lot harder than most of her critics have done/will. No doubt about that.

Harry? He is one of the few with morals.

Lol!

Publicly criticising his own family, making racist allegations that he has refused to substantiate.....and using his Royal title to sign multi-million dollar contracts with Netflix and others. Embracing the Californian celebrity circuit whilst the rest of his family are busy fulfilling their boring Royal duties.

Morals? You can't be serious.

Married a celebrity money grabber who is even disliked by most of her own family. Not a great choice.

 

[Ginza]

She was a victim of sex trafficking and sexual abuse, those statements are beyond fact.

Only in your mind.

She voluntarily agreed to have sex for money with Epstein when she was over 16...she knew what she was doing.

 

[Peter King]

The Queen is 95 and still working, even though she is wealthy and has no need to.

She has certainly worked a lot harder than most of her critics have done/will. No doubt about that.

She has no need to do? Well that is a ridiculous comment. If she has no desire to work anymore, she should abdicate. If you are queen you have to work

Lol!

Publicly criticising his own family, making racist allegations that he has refused to substantiate.....and using his Royal title to sign multi-million dollar contracts with Netflix and others. Embracing the Californian celebrity circuit whilst the rest of his family are busy fulfilling their boring Royal duties.

Morals? You can't be serious.

Married a celebrity money grabber who is even disliked by most of her own family. Not a great choice.

Yes, morals. He was not going to let his wife be harassed by the gutter press in the UK and the backstabbers in the Royal household. And yes, criticizing your own family when it is deserved shows a high level of morality. Now you might not agree but then again I think you are a card carrying member of the "I dislike Harry" fan club.

And he works for his money, HOW DARE HE???? Too pathetic. And Megan Markle sounds like a nice woman, at least much better than that stuck up Kate IMO.

 

[Peter King]

Only in your mind.

She voluntarily agreed to have sex for money with Epstein when she was over 16...the age of consent in the USA.

More nonsense, what a surprise.

 

[Ginza]

She has no need to do? Well that is a ridiculous comment. If she has no desire to work anymore, she should abdicate. If you are queen you have to work

Huge point miss there.

The point you missed is that she is wealthy enough not to need to work.

She chooses to work because has an incredible work ethic and sees doing so as her duty to her country.

 

[Ginza]

Of course not, prince pervert stopped the process before discovery and his testifying, then he would not have been able to lie anymore.

So you have found him guilty even though the only evidence against him is from a woman who admitted to selling her body for sex for many years.

I don't like him.....but it is idiotic to assume someone is guilty based on such flimsy "evidence"......from someone who herself is being accused of sex trafficking.

 

[Ginza]

"Alan Dershowitz calls Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre a ‘serial liar’"​

So who is more credible? A former Harvard Law Professor, or a prostitute who is making millions from claiming to be a victim?

Alan Dershowitz calls Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre a 'serial liar' while once again denying he ever had sex with her

A slew of court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were unsealed in federal court Friday. They include testimony from Virginia Roberts Giuffre accusing former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz of having sex with her while she was sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and...

www.businessinsider.com.au

 

[PoS]

You appear to have overlooked the fact that the girl had reached the age of consent when she alleges she had sex with Andrew.

Age means nothing when it comes to allegations of rape. Do you know what the meaning of rape is?

 

[Rich2018]

So what did he do wrong in a legal sense? Tell us please.

Actually nothing, unless she claims he physically subdued her before having sex - which she isn't
But morally he is miles in the wrong, and he's basically admitted to lying on public television.
A private citizen would fight and probably win - he really can't afford that though

There are moves to strip him of his last remaining title: The Duke of York.

 

[Peter King]

t

Huge point miss there.

The point you missed is that she is wealthy enough not to need to work.

She chooses to work because has an incredible work ethic and sees doing so as her duty to her country.

The point you seem to miss is that I am not missing anything. She is QUEEN!!! It is not "work" it is a calling and a function for which you cannot stop working. She cannot chose to work or not chose to work because that is not the job she has that allows this.

 

[Peter King]

So you have found him guilty even though the only evidence against him is from a woman who admitted to selling her body for sex for many years.

I don't like him.....but it is idiotic to assume someone is guilty based on such flimsy "evidence"......from someone who herself is being accused of sex trafficking.

No, he is a nonce's buddy, and he behaved like a nonce himself. And she admitted to selling her body for sex for "Many years"? When she was 14 she was prostituted (most likely) out by another nonce from Florida who later was jailed. At best the 14 year old was guilty of having sex under duress by a pedophile nonce called Eppinger, for a period of no longer than 6 months. She then at 14 went to live with her father and went to work at Trump's winter white house. Where she met Ghislaine Maxwell, she was reading about massages, she was then lured into the home of the nonce Eppstein. She was pimped out to give massages and perform sexual acts at age 17, meaning she was the victim of a human trafficking pervert.

That the convicted nonce pimped her out to other disgusting nonces (like Prince Pervert) at age 17. And if she sold her body for sex, it might have to do with being a molestation victim, a child sex trafficking victim and then being prostituted out by nonce and chief Eppstein.

The reason Prince Pervert Andrew is a pervert and a nonce because he KNEW or should have known that Eppstein was a convicted pedo and still made buddy buddy with Eppstein and his madam Ghislaine and had sex with a 17 year old when he was almost 40 and a royal.

And as she married her husband when she was 19, she was not selling her body for many years, she might have been prostituted out for a few years but that is not the same as being a voluntary grown ass woman who sells her body for sex.

 

[Ginza]

Actually nothing, unless she claims he physically subdued her before having sex - which she isn't

Correct.

She admitted to having sex with lots of men whilst with Epstein. But who has she sued? Only millionaires like Epstein and Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, who is a member of the British Royal family.

Says a whole lot about her.

She claims she was a victim but was actively recruiting other "victims" for Epstein.

You have to be a real moron to believe, without question, anything she says.

 

[Ginza]

Age means nothing when it comes to allegations of rape. Do you know what the meaning of rape is?

Lol! read up.

She has made no allegation of rape.