• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Americans' Declining Support for Openly Transgender U.S. Troops

Whether you use the term “gender identity” or not, that’s what you’re describing.
No I'm not. Woman describes an adult human female. You are just being pigheaded.
I never misrepresented your definition of “woman,”
If you think it's a gender identity yes you did.
I argued against your narrow application of those terms.
Opinion noted.
Do you plan to engage with any substance or just continue pretending you're right when medical science overwhelmingly disagrees?
Do you accept the meaning I apply to words and what I'm referring to?
 
A source that your contrived horse shit isn't contrived?

That's not how that works you have to present a source I don't have to prove you

It's funny you ask about engaging with substance but you didn't understand the basics.

A source that science’s pro-trans position is just to “appease people” as you claimed.
 
I corrected that statement. I said science when I meant contrived horseshit pretending to be science.

Did you not read that correction?

Cool. You tried to weasel out. I’m not letting you.

Provide a source or admit you pulled your opinion from your ass.

But you won’t. We already know your bigotry makes you deliberately lie, so you are deliberately lying again.
 
No I'm not. Woman describes an adult human female. You are just being pigheaded.

If you think it's a gender identity yes you did.

Opinion noted.

Do you accept the meaning I apply to words and what I'm referring to?
I accept that you apply the specific meaning of “adult human female” to “woman" and that you’re using it strictly in terms of biological sex. Do I accept that your definition is the only valid one? No, I don’t and neither does the medical community, legal community, and psychological community.

Gender identity is how people relate to that role internally. You labeling it opinion ignores your own acceptance of the definitions, which tells me you're cherry-picking parts of those definitions. Gender identity is backed by neuroscience, endocrinology, and psychology. So when someone identifies as a woman based on gender identity, they’re using a definition that’s supported by institutions you’ve chosen to ignore via your cherry-picking.

Microsoft Copilot said:
 
No they haven't. Governments produced propaganda and then used that propaganda as justification.

So how do I know studies confirming transgender care for minors is not propaganda?
 
That’s a survey, not a study.
Kindly stay out of other people's medical care that you do not understand. Watching Fox Noise every night does not make you qualified to decide what medical care others can access. Did you graduate with a PhD in psychology or an MD? How many years experience do you have in this field?




 
Kindly stay out of other people's medical care that you do not understand. Watching Fox Noise every night does not make you qualified to decide what medical care others can access. Did you graduate with a PhD in psychology or an MD? How many years experience do you have in this field?





Are you a medical doctor or psychologist? How much experience in a relative field do you have to respond in kind?
 
Are you a medical doctor or psychologist? How much experience in a relative field do you have to respond in kind?
More than 30 years. No, I'm not a Dr or psychologist.

I wrote a term paper on the subject in college as part of a psych sexuality course in 1988.
 
No they haven't. Governments produced propaganda and then used that propaganda as justification.

So four different countries have put out propaganda? Quite the conspiracy theory.
 
What is a liberal theorist? Ive never seen that as a job description.

So relivent credentials do you hold that makes telling other people they cannot?
 
So relivent credentials do you hold that makes telling other people they cannot?
Ive been invited and spoken to 2 colleges on the subject because of my knowledge of the subject matter.
 
So four different countries have put out propaganda? Quite the conspiracy theory.
No, several different countries have reassessed their guidelines based on medical findings, the need for more research, and an abundance of caution. That's part of the scientific method as applied to human health. Europe isn’t backtracking. It’s recalibrating. The backtracking is happening in places where science is being replaced by fear. You and other Americans who express transphobic ideologies are the ones using it as propaganda in an attempt to spread that same fear here.
 
I accept that you apply the specific meaning of “adult human female” to “woman" and that you’re using it strictly in terms of biological sex. Do I accept that your definition is the only valid one? No,
I didn't ask you to accept it as the only valid one just to understand what I mean when I say woman.
I don’t and neither does the medical community, legal community, and psychological community.
Not relevant neither community is involved in this discussion
Gender identity is how people relate to that role internally. You labeling it opinion ignores your own acceptance of the definitions, which tells me you're cherry-picking parts of those definitions. Gender identity is backed by neuroscience, endocrinology, and psychology. So when someone identifies as a woman based on gender identity, they’re using a definition that’s supported by institutions you’ve chosen to ignore via your cherry-picking.
Yes gender is a role and identity with the role is a thing. That was my starting position.
 
I didn't ask you to accept it as the only valid one just to understand what I mean when I say woman.

Not relevant neither community is involved in this discussion

Yes gender is a role and identity with the role is a thing. That was my starting position.
Cool. You’re welcome to hold your definition. However, when you enter a debate about gender identity on a public forum, you’re stepping into a space where multiple valid definitions coexist. Your definition does not apply as the sole definition in social, medical, and legal contexts. Saying those definitions don't apply in a public setting, a social setting, is ludicrous.
 
What do you know about military life? What experience or knowledge do you have that qualifies you to judge the fitness of anyone to serve in our military?
Very little, but I have common sense, which is more than can be said for someone who thinks sending the mentally ill into battle is a good idea.

Trans folks have been openly and honorably been serving in our armed forces for nearly a decade.

There’s no objective supportable reason for kicking them out.
There we differ.
 
I wrote a term paper on the subject in college as part of a psych sexuality course in 1988.

LMAO. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: 👌

giphy.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom