It does stand to reason that a Coptic Christian would not speak for a Wahhabist.
Actually, there is.Hate speech is NOT anything, because there is no such thing.
Hate speech is NOT anything, because there is no such thing.
Carney cited official releases from Al qaeda operatives directing muslims to kill soldiers as revenge for the film in question, and you label it as spin. You then proceed to cite an opinion piece from the Weekly Standard of all places as an example of empirical, non opinionated truth, when it is in fact, anything but.
I am really tired of your lies....... Why are you so insecure?
Oh...now we are to believe Al Qaeda??? Good god...
I get my information from a lot of sources...even liberal sources. I look beyond their spin for the kernels of truth and formulate my own opinion based on such information. The Weekly Standard article expresses the truth as we've seen from this latest government action against the filmmaker. The government's message is very clear in this - Americans...shut up.
You have been quite stedfast in your promotion of Wahhabism since you first joined this forum and you have an undeniable track record here. You display hatred against Jews and Christians, with corresponding support for Islamism so my reference is to what you promote.
You can claim to be a Venusian for all I care, but the proof is in the pudding here rather than the claim.
Actually, there is.
Of course there is... Don't you realize that you have the right to condemn the movie AND the violence... or are we sheep to let this guy speak for us to the Muslim world?
Shut up? I don't think so.. Americans are free to condemn the film and the violence.. but we are also free to promulgate the ridiculous, vulgar and insulting lies.
We are also free to embrace lack of education. See how that work?
Americans are free to condemn the film and the violence..
So I still have a right to say the film is trash and shame on that SOB for insulting Muslims, making Americans look like dolts and putting us at risk?
This idiot Egyptian doesn't speak for me.
Speech which is used as incitement to riot is not protected speech
Al qaeda has explicitly encouraged and fanned the flames of violence due to the film in question. It's quite useful as propaganda pieces go. There's little doubt that the film was used as a catalyst of sorts.Oh...now we are to believe Al Qaeda??? Good god...
I get my information from a lot of sources...even liberal sources. I look beyond their spin for the kernels of truth and formulate my own opinion based on such information.
The Weekly Standard article expresses the truth as we've seen from this latest government action against the filmmaker.
The government's message is very clear in this - Americans...shut up.
So please establish, then, how the movie informed people that they should attack Muslims.
Before doing so, I would suggest you learn what the word "incitement" means from a legal standpoint. It certainly does not mean "don't say anything offensive", since by your implied definition here, none of us could ever say a damned thing about ANYTHING political since there are always idiots out there who might react in violent ways.
Your attempt to subvert free speech to the dictates of Islamists is extremely questionable, since you base your understanding of incitement upon their reaction rather than anything qualifiable in the actual language of the film.
Not promotion.. education.. I fear you are unteachable.. I wonder where you got the notion that real Christians are required to be ignorant.
Can't Restrict CarelessTalk and Still Have Freedom of Speech!!!!! :usflag2:
Note that Terminology Sharon.....NO Abridging!
Well first of all Israel is a U.S. ally and second Palestinians have other reasons to attack Israel you know like Israel stealing their land, etc.
Israeli police officers stand behind their shields during clashes with stone-throwing Palestinian protesters in a demonstration against an anti-Islam film in front of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem's Old City on Friday.
Israeli police arrest a Palestinian protester on Friday.....snip~
If the US is to blame.....then why are the Palestinian Muslims attacking the Israelis?
Al qaeda has explicitly encouraged and fanned the flames of violence due to the film in question. It's quite useful as propaganda pieces go. There's little doubt that the film was used as a catalyst of sorts.
It was an opinion piece, and a piss poor one at that. You're attempting to rebuke empirical evidence with arm chair assertions.
The "government action" you speak of is in regards to the film makers parole status. It's a legitimate legal query, not a witchhunt, nor a violation of the individuals legal rights.
Actually, no. You're batting .000 so far on the subject in it's entirety.
Dude, the man was brought it not for his speech but because a Judge ordered a review of his parole, its in your own OP. His probation includes a restriction to computer and internet access except for work due to the fact that his bank fraud convention was done over the internet.
Also like the Muslims around the world protesting the US, you seem to think the President can simply order the arrest of someone, the only difference is your protesting his questioning as opposed to his not being arrested. If you're going to quote the Constitution you may want to understand the separation of powers and the limits of the Executive Branch, the President cannot order a man to be arrested which is why a Judge (again in your own OP) ordered him brought in for questioning which is a condition of his parole.
So please establish, then, how the movie informed people that they should attack Muslims.
Before doing so, I would suggest you learn what the word "incitement" means from a legal standpoint. It certainly does not mean "don't say anything offensive", since by your implied definition here, none of us could ever say a damned thing about ANYTHING political since there are always idiots out there who might react in violent ways.
Your attempt to subvert free speech to the dictates of Islamists is extremely questionable, since you base your understanding of incitement upon their reaction rather than anything qualifiable in the actual language of the film.
I don't think it does qualify as incitement to riot. But, it gets a little close.
LOL!!! Now you are excusing the actions of Al Qaeda. How low can you go, dude?
The video has been around for a long time. It's only now...when Obama needs a scapegoat...that action is being brought against the filmmaker.
The article had it right. Obama is telling Americans to shut up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?