- Joined
- Sep 24, 2005
- Messages
- 8,260
- Reaction score
- 1,064
- Location
- Whitewater, CO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Be specific.
Address in your answer the perfect score of those claiming ethics charges against her, ie, all charges filed dismissed as baseless.
Explain also how the grandson's sperm donor's failure to be a man and support his child negatively impacts anything about Sarah Palin.
Be specific.
Address in your answer the perfect score of those claiming ethics charges against her, ie, all charges filed dismissed as baseless.
Explain also how the grandson's sperm donor's failure to be a man and support his child negatively impacts anything about Sarah Palin.
Troopergate was not baseless. In fact, it was the reason she resigned.
No, it's not.
Child support is for the benefit of the child. It has nothing to do with whether the custodial parent is behaving properly in the eyes of the noncustodial parent. If the custodial parent is not complying with a lawful custody order, the noncustodial parent can pursue that in a separate matter.
Yeah, it was all his fault.:roll:
He is peying, just not enough for her to sit at home on the couch while stuffing her face with bon-bons & watching Maury.....
The new amount will allow that....:lol:
Ok I am going to explain this one more time. That is BRISTOL PALIN, NOT SARAH.
If it was Mrs. Sarah Palin, it would say that. It says Ms. Palin who is the unmarried Bristol, hence the Ms. and not Mrs. Now since Sarah Palin has no custodial rights, why would Levi Johnston, be going after Sarah Palin? Or asking her to visit?
Your argument makes no sense, and is moronic at best.
The only real failure here is me letting you suck me into your patented brand of insanity.
His personal failure to hold a job and provide support for his child is, yes, all his own fault.
:roll:
That guy was a scumbag.....
The riche-wing opinion is irrelevent here.
If he is not in the childs live and Bristol has full legal custody ... SHE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SUPPORT.
If you do not believe me, look it up.
$1750/mo for one child?
What kind of job does this kid do anyway??
1. When Levi went to do his shoot for Playgirl; He got call from Bristol stating that if he went through with the shoot, her mom would make it difficult for him to see his son.
That alone is sufficent to hall her ass into a courtroom and get a judge to order her to shut up her hole, and stay out of the child's relationship with his father.
Since you know NOTHING about the law and I have two college degrees in the subject, I think I have an idea of what makes sense here and what does not.
Your attitude is typical of the reiche-wing. It doesn't fly. Accept it and move on.
Only if the other parent legally gives up their parental rights........
Are you doling out your paycheck to all the orgs trying to cure diseases that you don't have?
We were talking about her getting pregnant.
He made over 100K last year
and will probably make as much on his book as Sarah did.
So he will eventually pay his bill while Bristol tools around town in a new Escalade.
She must have a good job.
From his account, he tried to pay but Bristol would not let him see the kid.
So?
THAT CALL IS CUSTODIAL INTEFERENCE ON SARAH PALIN'S PART.
Not in the United States.
What makes sense is that the boy pays his dues to his child, period.
You attitude is typical of the fools that actually use the phrase "reich-wing" in conversation. Only robots use such a pre-programmed perjorative phrase. Somebody's pushed your Hate Palin button, and you're following your script.
At this time, he doesn't have custody of his son... in any form ... therefore, the effect is the same.
Yeah, that's still his personal failure. Her's too, but men that get broads knocked up who don't plan on supporting the child for the next 18 years are also major ****-ups.
Totally irrelevant what Bristol does in this matter. He owes support, he should be forced to pay support.
Irrelevant.
[/quote]Guess what?
Custody and support payments are different issues entirely.
WRONG! He still has an obligation to pay support......
You are incorrect sir.
What makes sense is for Sarah Palin and the rest of the Reich-wing to stay out Levi's right to visit his son.
That was a personal insult. It is a trademark attack by the right when they get called on their bull**** views.
I do not hate Palin.
She is sticking her nose where it doesn't belong
and she needs to be told to butt out pay the consequences.
Just because the far-reich-wingers have trouble with the idea that the law applies to them as well as everybody else DOES NOT mean that it does not.
Palin will stay out of the custody fight or she will land her ex-gubenatorial ass in a cell.
IMO he is obligated to pay child support perhaps not legally if he wins the case or whatever, but morally speaking he does and he should without question.No, you are wrong.
I've been studying the law for the last 6 years. I have forgotten more about Family Law then you have ever learned.
Don't like it? Go to law school.
She has as much chance of going to jail for this as your Rapist president has for any of the rapes he committed.
IMO he is obligated to pay child support perhaps not legally if he wins the case or whatever, but morally speaking he does and he should without question.
Grandparents have legal rights to visitation as well.....
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?