Again, other than right wing homophobes, who has 'debunked it'? Second request.
As I said, and everyone can see, you'll post this drak endlessly. Still doesn't make it so.
repeating this false statement will never make it true, nor will it make the court cases that refer to it magically vanish lol
facts, laws, rights, constitution and court cases > the your opinions
A whole lot of very liberal black activists. Justices who aren't bowing to some liberal cause rather than the constitution. Those who realize what the reconstruction amendments were all about.
As I said, and everyone can see, you'll post this drak endlessly. Still doesn't make it so.
It's the favorite refrain of the Right when they keep getting their asses kicked in court over and over and over again.
Then stop doing it.
I'd take his reliance on judicial precedent over your interpretation of the constitution any day of the week.
another post and another dodge
wheres those facts that support you again, we are waiting LMAO
No you aren't, you're just repeating the same old drak that has been answered ad infinitum.
Marriage equality. That's really the right phrase because this isn't about equal rights for people.
.I hope my state has the distinction of being the last to succumb to liberal social engineering
People like Papa, Clown, Paleocon, etc are just angry that they lost and that the worldview they've relied upon is being eroded as time goes on. The end of this fight is in sight and they know it.
No, and this silly assertion has been debunked many times before in many threads.
Wow, duck and weave. Your god creates gays, if they are deviant, then god is not perfect, maybe even deviant.
You still have nothing other than you don't like gay people, lots of people didn't like black people, that is why there were laws against interracial marriage.
I don't support civil unions either, now. I did a few years ago. I thought it was an excellent way to provide the "equal rights" homosexuals were clamoring for without a great deal of political resistance. Of course, it became very clear to me after many discussions with homsexuals that it really wasn't about equal rights at all because that was rejected off hand because it didn't make homosexuality "as normal as heterosexuality". I was, however, of the mind that it was a reasonable concession to provide civil unions to any two people who wanted to be in a domestic partnership. But after my idiot militant homosexual activist brother (the same one that claims the government invented AIDS to wipe out homosexuals) threw a hissy fit and told me I need to get off the fence and stop being "ambivalent", I got off the fence. Now I can't and won't support either homosexual marriage or civil unions. The in-your-face attitude of militant homosexual activists isn't something that promotes sympathy or compassion. Not for me, anyway.
Those homosexuals who want to believe everyone that doesn't think homosexual marriage makes sense must be a religious right extremist are deluding themselves.
Oh yes, I sure you will. You obviously care more about some folks agreeing with you than you do about the rewriting of the constitution by a few robed folks.
State endorsement of marriage at the state level is very much about taxes. Homosexual marriage will lower state and federal revenues.Basically, it's a tax dodge for homosexuals.
People {EDIT}are just angry that they lost and that the worldview they've relied upon is being eroded as time goes on. The end of this fight is in sight and they know it.
Could you explain precisely how same sex marriage is not an equal protection issue and perhaps cite exactly how the over 45 judges who have ruled otherwise are wrong?
Could you explain precisely how same sex marriage is not an equal protection issue and perhaps cite exactly how the over 45 judges who have ruled otherwise are wrong?
Was there an election where you were named as Supreme Interpreter of the U.S. Constitution? Damn, nobody told me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?