• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AIG exit plan to slash U.S. bailout costs-official

One last post on this thread in answer to the BOGUS revisionist claims that Reagan caused some kind of economic problems here are some facts you can either digest or choke on.

And think about the Leader of the Trifecta Of Doom, Obama's plans to tax hell out of us. Then get a grip and and help save us from the coming disaster and vote the bums out in Nov.

Fact: Interest rates eased after Reagan slashed tax rates.

The long-bond yield was 13.45 percent in 1981. By the time Reagan left office in 1989, it had dropped to 8.45 percent. Mortgage rates fell from 14.70 percent to 10.13 percent over the same period.

Fact: Inflation cooled.

In the year before Reagan's tax cuts took effect, the annual rate of consumer inflation was 13.5 percent. In the first year of his tax cut, 1981, inflation was 10.3 percent. In the second year, it was 6.2 percent. By the third and final year, 1983, inflation had dropped to 3.2 percent. When Reagan left office, inflation stood at a tame 4.8 percent.

Fact: The economy reached full employment.

Before Reagan's full tax-relief package took effect, the jobless rate hit 9.6 percent. But as tax cuts worked their magic in the economy, unemployment dropped every year after 1983, reaching a low of 5.3 percent in 1989.

Tax cuts benefited minorities, too. The jobless rate among blacks plunged from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989.

Fact: Government revenues nearly doubled after Reagan's sweeping tax cuts.

Before his 25 percent across-the-board cut in individual income-tax rates went into effect, government receipts from individual income taxes trickled in at $244.1 billion. The year Reagan left office, they totaled $445.7 billion -- an 82 percent jump.

In the tax-hiking, supposedly "fiscally responsible" '90s, by comparison, individual tax receipts rose a comparable 86 percent.

More key, individual tax receipts grew at a compound annual rate of 6.9 percent from 1980 to 1989 (compared with a 7.1 percent rate from 1990 to 1999).

Councilman out.
 
Which he then promptly increased by increasing Social Security taxes
The long-bond yield was 13.45 percent in 1981. By the time Reagan left office in 1989, it had dropped to 8.45 percent. Mortgage rates fell from 14.70 percent to 10.13 percent over the same period.

Fact: Inflation cooled.
Not due to anything Reagan did, Paul Vocker raised the fed funds rate, caused a very large recession to get rid of inflation again not due to anything Reagan did The tax cuts caused large government deficits, which caused US federal government debt as a % of GDP to increase by over 20% during the Reagan admin. It was the deficit spending that provided the majority of the growth during the Reagan admin, remove that spending and economic growth would have been minimal
Tax cuts benefited minorities, too. The jobless rate among blacks plunged from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989.
Not tax cuts, government stimulus
Fact: Government revenues nearly doubled after Reagan's sweeping tax cuts.
Yet government debt as % of GDP increased even faster

The Reagan admin was not fiscally responsible, not by a long shot, it increased government debt as % of GDP not seen in the US since WW2. Nearly every admin from WW2 to the Reagan admin either lowered or generally maintained % debt to GDP (possible exception being Nixon. Carters record on that record is by far better then Reagan.
 
this thread isn't about bush and reagan

why do you want to derail it?
 
Bernanke and the top economic minds in the country said we would have gone into a depression worse than the Great One without the spending.

well, it's not as if the chairmen and his clubby chums operate in a political vacuum
 

per the pollyannish report issued by the veep's office yesterday: 70% of recovery act money (we're not allowed to use the s-word) has been spent, 551B, creating or saving or accounting for with a ridiculous lack of credibility 1.5M jobs, at a cost of almost 400K per

it was in the news

washingtonpost.com
 
 

what's truly pathetic, by my view, is anyone who would attempt to make YOU the topic of this discussion

that said, you speak for yourself very ably

you're actually interesting, unlike most the personality prone posters around here
 
 
One last post on this thread in answer to the BOGUS revisionist claims that Reagan caused some kind of economic problems here are some facts you can either digest or choke on.
t.

Reagan caused a huge economic problem. Of course you revisionists always selectively forget about the savings and loan collapse that cost the taxpayers 170 billion dollars. Some of you seem to live in your own little world, ignoring reality.
 

No, I do actually know what people I talked to said. You go on any number of boards and find republicans arguuing that deficit spending don't matter. Many argued in support of Bush's spending.

And if you were alive during the 80's, and paid attention, many argued the same with Reagan. So, no mind reading was required.
 

I can't speak to the effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of the ARRA. For now, I'd say the verdict is still out since the only "equity" the States or the People will see out of it is "sweat equity", i.e., rebuilding bridges, repairing or laying new roadways, building mass transit systems or laying new routes (i.e., high-speed rail), etc., etc.

Until the States start taking private-public projects more seriously instead of using most of the ARRA money to prop up their own budgets (much like the banks and AIG did), improvements in our nation's infrastructure will continue to be put on hold.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…