• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AI agrees WTC7 was a controlled demolition!

C

commonsense101

New member
Joined
May 15, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
13
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0718.webp
    IMG_0718.webp
    58.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0719.webp
    IMG_0719.webp
    57.5 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0720.webp
    IMG_0720.webp
    56.2 KB · Views: 9
The accuracy and effectiveness of AI systems directly depend on the quality and quantity of the data they are trained on. If the data is inaccurate, biased, incomplete, or insufficient, the AI model's predictions and outputs will be correspondingly flawed. This is often summarized as "garbage in, garbage out" in the context of AI.
 
KingLeo said:
The accuracy and effectiveness of AI systems directly depend on the quality and quantity of the data they are trained on. If the data is inaccurate, biased, incomplete, or insufficient, the AI model's predictions and outputs will be correspondingly flawed. This is often summarized as "garbage in, garbage out" in the context of AI.
Click to expand...
Which is exactly like a person.
 
Controlled demolition doesn't even make sense. You can't just place several tons of TNT in a building, and drill the hundreds or thousands of holes to place them in without the people working there noticing. Prepping a building for demolition is a big operation.

Also, what's the motive?
 
The answers also depend on who is asking the question.

When I ask ChatGPT similar questions using a guest account in a private browser window, it says that the towers were destroyed in a terrorist attack. When asked specifically about controlled demolition, it says that theory is "debunked" and that "the controlled demolition theory has been thoroughly investigated and dismissed by experts."

Maybe you should see what's in your ChatGPT history that resulted in those answer....
 
Visbek said:
The answers also depend on who is asking the question.

When I ask ChatGPT similar questions using a guest account in a private browser window, it says that the towers were destroyed in a terrorist attack. When asked specifically about controlled demolition, it says that theory is "debunked" and that "the controlled demolition theory has been thoroughly investigated and dismissed by experts."
Click to expand...

Visbek said:
Maybe you should see what's in your ChatGPT history that resulted in those answer....
Click to expand...

yeah but...

Chat GPT leans left and works for the Oligarchy

try using https://www.perplexity.ai/ for more Objective answers. although you prolly never get a Great cutting edge answer; you gotta do yur own hard work and thinking for that.

most will not.

since that is the case, the Oligarchs tend to destroy things at will and the Controlled/Owned Media covers for them.

do you really think CNN/Fox gonna spill the Beans?

think about it and come back.


.
 
Aristaeus said:
Controlled demolition doesn't even make sense. You can't just place several tons of TNT in a building, and drill the hundreds or thousands of holes to place them in without the people working there noticing. Prepping a building for demolition is a big operation.

Also, what's the motive?
Click to expand...
Fast cheap demolition for a new project.
 
Aristaeus said:
Controlled demolition doesn't even make sense. You can't just place several tons of TNT in a building, and drill the hundreds or thousands of holes to place them in without the people working there noticing. Prepping a building for demolition is a big operation.
Click to expand...

sure it does, watch some building brought down this way: that IS how they are brought down. start there my friends.



Aristaeus said:
Also, what's the motive?
Click to expand...

these questions have all been answered.

but you have to want to know and understand Building Demolition. most sheep have no Clue concerning this and don't wanna know either.

or you can watch the 911 videos where this is explained ad nauseam.

a better question is: why do you want to know The Truth; isn't the Official Propaganda line good enuf? you could be skating on Thin Ice, then what. ?

perhaps the Fire Fighters know some things, and are brave enuf to handle The Truth?

are you up to that Caliber?....





.
 
commonsense101 said:
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition.
Click to expand...

ok, good conclusion.

but........why do people resist what should be Common Sense in how a building demolition works ? is it fear?

it took me 2 days to understand after the shock wore off. talked to a guy in Construction in how Building Demolition works: no rocket science needed. just Boom Science LOL

but people will Intellectualize this till death do us part, when even a child can understand pulling the supports from under a building makes building go boom.

but all of Life is like this most days.


.
 
commonsense101 said:
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
When you trust ChatGPT to test your CT:

themouthyrenegadewriter.substack.com

Chat GPT Analyzes Trump’s Alleged Assassination Attempt

There Are Startling Details, But the Result is No Surprise
themouthyrenegadewriter.substack.com themouthyrenegadewriter.substack.com

Conclusion? Trump's assassination attempt was staged.
 
Revelation said:
sure it does, watch some building brought down this way: that IS how they are brought down. start there my friends.





these questions have all been answered.

but you have to want to know and understand Building Demolition. most sheep have no Clue concerning this and don't wanna know either.

or you can watch the 911 videos where this is explained ad nauseam.

a better question is: why do you want to know The Truth; isn't the Official Propaganda line good enuf? you could be skating on Thin Ice, then what. ?

perhaps the Fire Fighters know some things, and are brave enuf to handle The Truth?

are you up to that Caliber?....





.
Click to expand...

Why would I believe an English fire fighter who wasn't at 9/11/2001, when I have first hand accounts from firefighters who were at ground Zero on 9/11/2001?
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
Why would I believe an English fire fighter who wasn't at 9/11/2001, when I have first hand accounts from firefighters who were at ground Zero on 9/11/2001?
Click to expand...
First hand account of what?
 
AI also thinks this :

download (11).webp
 


Grok on what they say about WTC7 in the interview:

-They argue that WTC7’s collapse exhibits characteristics of a controlled demolition rather than a fire-induced failure. Key points include:

-Symmetrical Collapse: They claim WTC7 fell uniformly into its own footprint at near-free-fall speed, resembling a controlled demolition, which they argue is inconsistent with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report attributing the collapse to fire and debris impact from the Twin Towers.

-Explosive Evidence: They cite witness accounts of explosions and physical evidence, such as molten metal and thermite residues, suggesting the presence of explosives.

-NIST Report Critique: They challenge NIST’s conclusion that fires caused the collapse, alleging the agency ignored evidence of controlled demolition and manipulated data to fit the official narrative.

-Call for Investigation: They advocate for a new, independent investigation into WTC7’s collapse, emphasizing that the building was not hit by a plane, yet collapsed similarly to the Twin Towers.
 
You can get an AI to agree to anything. It's easy to convince it you just tell it something is in a certain way, and the AI will happily oblige.
 
joluoto said:
You can get an AI to agree to anything. It's easy to convince it you just tell it something is in a certain way, and the AI will happily oblige.
Click to expand...
Yeah, once you know how LLM "AI" actually functions, people using its statements as evidence becomes especially hilarious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom