I gave you a peer reviewed article, on the specific topic, debunking your claim and you gave me an irrelevant hoax and gibberish.
Lol, such an NPC.
Like your claimed source. The language this “study” uses is incomprehensible and full of words that are not actual standardized words in normal English
Lol ok guy
Your posts are full of shit, and you are talking a lot cause you were caught not knowing something.In other words,
In your opinion, how old should a child be to watch Disney's Cinderella?
Not asking who should show it to them, just whether they should be watching it in the first place.
Reasons for this thread will be posted later.
lolEvery parent knows there kids and should make that decision based on the child. There is no magical age.
lol
Parents are very very rarely competent to make decisions for their children.
Most all parents are dopes.
I can see how you could come to that conclusion if you are hanging out with the extreme right wing crowd that you do. There are a lot of other people out there beyond the nutbag super Trumpers though.
So what makes people gay? You might as well ask what makes some guys like womens breasts, others their legs. Or what makes women like guys' butts. All of the above is normal... or abnormal. Who cares? Too complex to analyze, unless that's your job. Just enjoy it, celebrate its complicated wonder, so long as you and she or he are of age.I reject the notion other animals display homosexuality. Homosexuality is a political construction and not a biological one. You can say other animals engage in acts analogous to sodomy, but you cannot say they are “gay”
There’s no evolutionary reason for “homosexuality”. And the idea it’s genetic is unproven.
Women have been wearing makeup for centuries. How is that not catfishing men?She didn’t catfish the prince. That’s a modern phenomenon
What about overpopulation. In theory homosexuality could be natures response to a species killing itself by being overly reproductive.I reject the notion other animals display homosexuality. Homosexuality is a political construction and not a biological one. You can say other animals engage in acts analogous to sodomy, but you cannot say they are “gay”
There’s no evolutionary reason for “homosexuality”. And the idea it’s genetic is unproven.
Old Yeller is a good one for your list.Didn't vote in the poll.
I say let the parent decide if it is age appropriate for their kids to watch an old Disney movie.
If one is questioning when a child should watch Cinderella. Then one may be concerned with
- Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs
- Bambi
- Peter Pan
- Sleeping Beauty
- Alice in Wonderland
- Treasure Island
- 20,000 leagues under the sea
- Davey Crocket.
and many more I have forgotten.
I saw all the films I listed when I was a kid growing up in the 50's. Never was concerned about the kissing or other issues some people today may have with the films.
Didn't even occur to me to think gay/bi/hetro/binary when watching the films. They were just fun to watch.
This is a religious and not a scientific idea.What about overpopulation. In theory homosexuality could be natures response to a species killing itself by being overly reproductive.
Women have been wearing makeup for centuries. How is that not catfishing men?
If it's the same Cinderella I saw as a kid, any age. Same for Peter Pan, Snow White, Bambi and Pinocchio.In your opinion, how old should a child be to watch Disney's Cinderella?
Not asking who should show it to them, just whether they should be watching it in the first place.
Reasons for this thread will be posted later.
Disgusting indeed! As an advocate of no public displays of affection, I find this absolutely appalling and in appropriate for kids of any age. This is something that adults discover on their own and practice in the privacy of their own homes with the curtains drawn so no one can see them.I, personally, would not feel comfortable showing kids such an openly sexualized show such as Cinderella. Gay kids don't need to be needlessly sexually confused by being subjected to straight propaganda at such a young age. Look how openly Disney shoves these heteros down our throats.
View attachment 67384544
Disgusting. Anyone that thinks scenes like this are appropriate for children is probably just a groomer trying to normalize their sick hetero agenda in children.
I think mostly yes. It’s been documented before that primitive societies in Africa don’t even have words to describe homosexuality. Not that they hate homosexuals or are “homophobic” under modern understanding, but that they are literally baffled by the very concept, having never observed it.
This would seem to argue against the idea it’s a genetic condition people are “born” as
Why the heck should we care what a 'religious' belief is on this issue?This is a religious and not a scientific idea.
How can you not take "salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo!" seriously?All in all it's just a fairly good movie with a fun soundtrack that you really can't take ~too~ seriously, like most "princess" movies.
My kid just watched Osmosis Jones during one of his classes. Kids get to not only see movies in school with heterosexuals kissing, but also will hear/read stories about those things too.The FL law is about teachers and what shouldn’t be part of instruction in K-3. The OP didn’t specify at school. Most kids will see Disney movies at home instead of school.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?