faithful_servant
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 12,533
- Reaction score
- 5,660
- Location
- Beautiful Central Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
We went through this, it was a Pumpkin launched from the USS Jack o Lantern in the Pacific.
Ok. It wasn't a plane. What was it and what kept it in the air?
One person (from let's roll?) said it looked like the wings weren't stationary and something was rotating. I have no clue, but maybe a small drone. That's not slow-mo either. No way that could be a plane. Too small and slow. The footage is good enough to conclude that it wasn't a plane or chopper. Beyond that it don't really matter to me.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sma...ei=0fntVObnJpGUyAS85YBo&ved=0CDMQsAQ#imgdii=_
[/URL]
Ok. It wasn't a plane.
You keep saying it, but make no attempt to prove it. How is a floating ball a plane? How would you prove it beyond saying you believe it's a plane?
By the way, it's quite strange how this "ball-shaped" object that hit the South tower looks exactly like a plane.
You are delusional. It wasn't plane for one simple reason. A plane could not pass east of T1 less than two seconds before it struck the southeast corner of T2. That's a fact you can never refute.
No you fail to understand 3 dimension movement.
That is a failing on your part one of your many many many failings such as failure to make the video fuzzier so the plane is still visible.
Its not a ball its a plane, you keep saying its a ball I think you need to get your eyes checked or post fuzzier videos because you are the only one who doesn't realize its a plane.
Its not a ball its a plane, you keep saying its a ball I think you need to get your eyes checked or post fuzzier videos because you are the only one who doesn't realize its a plane.
Well, besides other conspiracy theorists like him that believe in this narrative.
Are you sure about that?
Lies! You fail to understand the truth because you are a brainwashed sheeple!
Well, besides other conspiracy theorists like him that believe in this narrative.
No you fail to understand 3 dimension movement.
That is a failing on your part one of your many many many failings such as failure to make the video fuzzier so the plane is still visible.
Why doesn't the ball look like a plane? Everything else is made out clearly.
Go ahead and explain it. You would have to prove the news anchors were wrong.:lamo A plane would have been captured by chopper 4, but it wasn't. It also had to be coming south to north. The ball moved west to east in a straight line.
Well there may be a few loonies, one should never expect everyone to be sane
The PLANE moved in a curve not a straight line, it only looked straight in your fuzzy video because of the perspective. Not that it would matter in 3 dimensions it could still do that in a straight line, but you dont think in 3 dimensions.
Why didn't chopper 4 capture 175 flying over NY bay in the two minutes prior to the ball showing up?:lamo These are questions you'd have to answer in the real world.
The ball never curved in any way when it was in sight.
You know you are right they did have one of those super 360 degree cameras that can see through buildings going didn't they?
Not from the perspective of that video. You need to think 3 dimensionally to understand this
Not from the perspective of that video. You need to think 3 dimensionally to understand this
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?