• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adam Schiff moves to hide treason

No, I didn't. Trello has no more to do with "Q" than Google does

🤣

Yeah, you did. This is getting ridiculous.

From your link:

[Q #4521] Adam Schiff Introducing Bill to Amend Posse Comitatus Act
https://reputationmanagementstrateg...6/q-4521-adam-schiff-introducing-bill-to.html

EbTQIj_WoAYxTwX.jpghttps://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7297?r=1&s=1?
Worth tracking.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf?
"The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S. Code, Section 1385, an original intent of which was to end the use of federal troops [TO POLICE STATE ELECTIONS] in former Confederate states, proscribes the role of the Army and Air Force in executing civil laws and states."
KEY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT
"Pursuant to the presidential power to quell domestic violence, federal troops are expressly exempt from the prohibitions of Posse Comitatus Act, and this exemption applies equally to active-duty military and federalized National Guard troops."
What is Adam Schiff trying to prevent?
Everything you are witnessing [past & present [future]] centrally revolves around the Presidential Election of 2020.
Win by any means necessary [self-preservation].
Q


That's your source - a "Q drop."


What you CAN'T do is offer a rational or reasoned post - and certainly not one that addresses Schitt's attempt to exclude "evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€.

Read the whole section, and note the bolded part:

ā€œ(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any evidence obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of subsection (a) shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€
 
I’m not convinced Q made it to high school.

You of the left are desperate to derail a thread exposing your party.

That says a lot.

What is Schitt hiding?

Why did the traitor fool move to exclude "evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€.
 
You of the left are desperate to derail a thread exposing your party.

That says a lot.

What is Schitt hiding?

Why did the traitor fool move to exclude "evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€.
Since you're so convinced Schiff is hiding something, tell us what you think it is? You've been asked twice by me; why so coy? Oh, and the only thing being exposed here is the ignorant stupidity of your posts.
 
And was never presented, until it was bundled into the house appropriations bill.

So why is Schitt trying to silence those who bring evidence of criminal acts?

Pretty obvious.

Didn't Schitt claim that he had a military whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, when he staged the attempted coup against Trump? So he wants to block actions he took?

The ā€œStrengthening the Posse Comitatus Act of 2020ā€ was a response to the Trump Administration’s positioning of active duty U.S. Army units during recent widespread protests over the death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis, and considered deploying them to major American cities, according to a statement issued by Schiff’s office. The troops were never deployed.

ā€œJust three weeks ago, the Administration made preparations to deploy active duty U.S. military forces across a number of U.S. cities, including the nation’s capital, an unnecessary step that would have heightened an already tense situation and risked catastrophe,ā€ Schiff said.


ā€œAs we have seen time and again with this President, we cannot rely on past norms to prevent the misuse of authorities. That’s why it is important to make it more difficult for this or any other president to misuse the military in a domestic law enforcement capacity,ā€ he said. ā€œAmericans exercising their First Amendment rights are not enemies, and should never be considered that way. This legislation would help ensure that civil liberties are always protected, including during mass protests.ā€

First passed in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act makes it a crime to use the Army or Air Force to enforce law within the U.S. Exceptions must be authorized by an Act of Congress or the Constitution itself.

The legislation put forward by Schiff would expand the wording of the act to include all branches of the military, according to Schiff’s office.

ā€œAlthough the Marines and the Navy have adhered to these standards according to internal policy and administrative action, this legislation would ensure their inclusion by law, as well as the federalized National Guard and Reserve components,ā€ the statement said.

It would also bar evidence unlawfully obtained by, or with the assistance of, the military in legal proceedings, representatives of Schiff said.


 
You of the left are desperate to derail a thread exposing your party.

That says a lot.

What is Schitt hiding?

Why did the traitor fool move to exclude "evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€.
You don't think you derailed your own argument by calling a Jewish Congressman a Nazi?
 
🤣

You're citing "Q?"


ROFL

I just looked back at the Trello link

[Q #4521]

That is QUESTION. It has NOTHING to do with CNN created Q-Anon

LOL

Wow - not dealing with the sharpest marshmallow in the bag here....
 
You don't think you derailed your own argument by calling a Jewish Congressman a Nazi?
Don't confuse him any more than he already is; he thinks Democrats are Fascists, and doesn't understand the stark difference between those two opposing ideologies.
 
Since you're so convinced Schiff is hiding something, tell us what you think it is? You've been asked twice by me; why so coy?
I don’t know why Uncensored isn’t replying. I think he may be hiding something. After all, Schiff did this in 2020 and it’s being brought up only now. Why? Why did Uncensored wait two years with this secret? And further I can’t help but note that he only became uncensored in 2008. Before that he was self-censored. Why?! What were he and Schiff doing in 2007 that they had to bury so deeply?

We need to look into this very strongly and with great strength. In fact my people are looking into this and you want to believe what they’re finding.
 
ROFL

I just looked back at the Trello link

[Q #4521]

That is QUESTION. It has NOTHING to do with CNN created Q-Anon

LOL

Wow - not dealing with the sharpest marshmallow in the bag here....
This, from someone who thinks Democracy and Fascism are similes. Projection? :LOL:
 
ROFL

I just looked back at the Trello link

[Q #4521]

That is QUESTION. It has NOTHING to do with CNN created Q-Anon

LOL

Wow - not dealing with the sharpest marshmallow in the bag here....

🤣

You can't possibly be this willfully ignorant. Your source even links to "qmap" for it. Here's another link to it:

 
I don’t know why Uncensored isn’t replying. I think he may be hiding something. After all, Schiff did this in 2020 and it’s being brought up only now. Why? Why did Uncensored wait two years with this secret? And further I can’t help but note that he only became uncensored in 2008. Before that he was self-censored. Why?! What were he and Schiff doing in 2007 that they had to bury so deeply?

We need to look into this very strongly and with great strength. In fact my people are looking into this and you want to believe what they’re finding.
I suspect he's only 24. Give the poor dear some slack! Are we still waiting for those 'unbelievable' findings from Hawaii?
 
🤣

Yeah, you did. This is getting ridiculous.

From your link:

[Q #4521] Adam Schiff Introducing Bill to Amend Posse Comitatus Act
https://reputationmanagementstrateg...6/q-4521-adam-schiff-introducing-bill-to.html

EbTQIj_WoAYxTwX.jpghttps://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7297?r=1&s=1?
Worth tracking.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf?
"The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S. Code, Section 1385, an original intent of which was to end the use of federal troops [TO POLICE STATE ELECTIONS] in former Confederate states, proscribes the role of the Army and Air Force in executing civil laws and states."
KEY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT
"Pursuant to the presidential power to quell domestic violence, federal troops are expressly exempt from the prohibitions of Posse Comitatus Act, and this exemption applies equally to active-duty military and federalized National Guard troops."
What is Adam Schiff trying to prevent?
Everything you are witnessing [past & present [future]] centrally revolves around the Presidential Election of 2020.
Win by any means necessary [self-preservation].
Q


That's your source - a "Q drop."




Read the whole section, and note the bolded part:

ā€œ(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any evidence obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of subsection (a) shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€


ROFL

You're calling Rand "Q"


Wow - just wow.

Queen Elizabeth is part of Q-ANON

BWAHAHAHAHAH

All you wanted to do is derail a thread that exposes the corruption of your party.
 
I don’t know why Uncensored isn’t replying. I think he may be hiding something. After all, Schiff did this in 2020 and it’s being brought up only now. Why? Why did Uncensored wait two years with this secret? And further I can’t help but note that he only became uncensored in 2008. Before that he was self-censored. Why?! What were he and Schiff doing in 2007 that they had to bury so deeply?

We need to look into this very strongly and with great strength. In fact my people are looking into this and you want to believe what they’re finding.

Uncensored is a double agent for the cabal....
 
Rep. Adam Schiff (Nazi,CA) snuck a provision into the defense appropriations act which alters Posee Comitatus to bar investigators from investigating criminal and potentially treasonous acts by government officials.


In the face of a Republican takeover of the House after the November elections, Schiff is engaged in a coverup to hide the actions of the J6 committee in a bid to avoid prosecution for acts up to and including obstruction of justice and treason.

The new provision outlaws "whistle blowers" from exposing criminal acts by superior officers or civilian officials. The act would exclude any evidence of crimes from all courts

{
(3) by adding at the end the following:

ā€œ(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any evidence obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of subsection (a) shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.ā€.} (Emphasis added)
This certainly appears to be an attempt to protect some previous action from future prosecution. Wonder why? Schiff has long had a big mouth and made accusations he couldn not back up. His claim to have the evidence of Collusion never materialized. I would suspect he is in fact looking to protect himself and other democrats from possible wrongdoing related to their many investigations and claims against Trump.
They love to claim they were proceeding in "good faith" which we all know is BS.
 
ROFL

You're calling Rand "Q"


Wow - just wow.

Queen Elizabeth is part of Q-ANON

BWAHAHAHAHAH

All you wanted to do is derail a thread that exposes the corruption of your party.
Oh dear. The poster you replied to clearly cited qmap.com as one of your linked sources. Nice try at deflection, but as with all your other posts, you failed. Maybe you should quit digging that hole?
 
ROFL

You're calling Rand "Q"


Wow - just wow.

Queen Elizabeth is part of Q-ANON

BWAHAHAHAHAH

All you wanted to do is derail a thread that exposes the corruption of your party.

🤣

I guess we're in the "flailing" stage, now.
 
ROFL

I just looked back at the Trello link

[Q #4521]

That is QUESTION. It has NOTHING to do with CNN created Q-Anon

LOL

Wow - not dealing with the sharpest marshmallow in the bag here....
Uh pro tip: marshmallows are usually round or have rounded corners and edges, and lack sharpness. I guess we’re not dealing with the roundest marshmallow in the bag here…
 
Don't confuse him any more than he already is; he thinks Democrats are Fascists, and doesn't understand the stark difference between those two opposing ideologies.
I mean, my disdain for antisemites notwithstanding, there is a discussion to be had here. You can engage with the history of the Spanish falange, Italian fascism, the Lebanese kataeb or elements of the French AF and and not immediately encounter the 'Jewish question'. But this just doesn't hold true for the Nazi Party, or the Romanian Iron Guard, or the Hammerskins of Pennsyltucky. With them, antisemitism is the thing.

And I am just not buying that it's an accident that this guy, - or the millions like him - obsessed with death camps for white people and the Ron Watkins New Protocols of Zion Happy Hour are just, whoops, lasering the word 'Nazi' at Jews, homosexuals, Black people, the Other from mere ignorance.
 
So.... no breaking news in this thread then?
 
I mean, my disdain for antisemites notwithstanding, there is a discussion to be had here. You can engage with the history of the Spanish falange, Italian fascism, the Lebanese kataeb or elements of the French AF and and not immediately encounter the 'Jewish question'. But this just doesn't hold true for the Nazi Party, or the Romanian Iron Guard, or the Hammerskins of Pennsyltucky. With them, antisemitism is the thing.

And I am just not buying that it's an accident that this guy, - or the millions like him - obsessed with death camps for white people and the Ron Watkins New Protocols of Zion Happy Hour are just, whoops, lasering the word 'Nazi' at Jews, homosexuals, Black people, the Other from mere ignorance.
Or, more simply, he's just engaging in projection-but I take your point.
 
Since you're so convinced Schiff is hiding something, tell us what you think it is? You've been asked twice by me; why so coy? Oh, and the only thing being exposed here is the ignorant stupidity of your posts.
I'm sure many people wonder about Adam Schiff's roll in the Collusion narrative and the Ukraine phone call investigation. The mystery whistleblower was believed to be attached to Schiff. Was Schiff writing the narrative would be the question. Was it fact or was it fiction? Did Schiff create it for purely political purposes to try to remove a President?
 
Or, more simply, he's just engaging in projection-but I take your point.
With these guys, what they project is always the fevered heart of their all-consuming desire. They can't help it. They tell us what their daimon is when the point their fingers and accuse.
 
I'm sure many people wonder about Adam Schiff's roll in the Collusion narrative and the Ukraine phone call investigation. The mystery whistleblower was believed to be attached to Schiff. Was Schiff writing the narrative would be the question. Was it fact or was it fiction? Did Schiff create it for purely political purposes to try to remove a President?
I don't deal in speculation; just facts.
 
Back
Top Bottom