• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adam Schiff calls for investigation after report of his phone records being seized by Trump DOJ

Business ties to a business in Russia or business ties to Russia?? Those are two distinctly different things (unless one is a conspiracy theorist like yourself).
trying to deflect again I see with word play. Fact is Trump lied about his ties with Russia. Period. End. of. staement and fact.
 
The fact remains that the IG report said the words were false. IG Horowitz worked for Obama before Trump.
The fact is anyone can say it but nothing in has ever been proven false...

Hell bar said there was no collusion and then the Mueller report was released and we learned he lied...
 
The fact is anyone can say it but nothing in has ever been proven false...

Hell bar said there was no collusion and then the Mueller report was released and we learned he lied...
But what you’re saying here is provably incorrect. You clearly have your mind made up and surely won’t be dissuaded by the facts. I wonder what your opinion of the IG will be when he completes his review of this matter.
 



The phone metadata of Democrat Reps. Schiff (CA) and Swalwell (CA) (and their wives and children) were secretly subpoenaed by Trump/Barr. I can't recall personal Congressional phone logs ever being subpoenaed.

What is the Garland DoJ planning to do about this?

Hunting Leaks, Trump Officials Seized Records of Democrats

Then he should demand an investigation of himself as well.


Priceless!
 
But what you’re saying here is provably incorrect. You clearly have your mind made up and surely won’t be dissuaded by the facts. I wonder what your opinion of the IG will be when he completes his review of this matter.
Then prove it...
 
Then prove it...
It's a rainy afternoon where I'm at so I do have the time on my hands. Do you require direct quotes from Horowicz testimony or will an article that highlights them suffice?
 
It's a rainy afternoon where I'm at so I do have the time on my hands. Do you require direct quotes from Horowicz testimony or will an article that highlights them suffice?
Prove something in the dossier that has been proven false...
 
Prove something in the dossier that has been proven false...
I’ll play your little game because I suspect I know what your tactics will be. So here goes:
The dossier alleges that Michael Cohen traveled to Prague to coordinate things. The problem is Michael Cohen (at least the Michael Cohen connected to Donald Trump) says he has never been to Prague and his passport proves it.
 
I’ll play your little game because I suspect I know what your tactics will be. So here goes:
The dossier alleges that Michael Cohen traveled to Prague to coordinate things. The problem is Michael Cohen (at least the Michael Cohen connected to Donald Trump) says he has never been to Prague and his passport proves it.
And he lied, it was proven his cell phone pinGED off a tower in Prague.

Try again...
 
And he lied, it was proven his cell phone pinGED off a tower in Prague.

Try again...
Damn. We should ask Bob Mueller about it.
Anyway:
The dossier allegations about the pee pee tape.

Horowicz says there was no corroboration for that. A source for that allegation called it rumor and speculation.
 
who signed that subpoena? What was their evidence that led to the need to seize his records? If it was strictly political, people need to go to prison....if not...we need to see what their motive was..
You don't get to raise such outrage until you have the same level of outrage for #59.
 
Damn. We should ask Bob Mueller about it.
Anyway:
The dossier allegations about the pee pee tape.

Horowicz says there was no corroboration for that. A source for that allegation called it rumor and speculation.
There is much in it that has not been verified, but nothing has been proven false.

Steele himself estimated the accuracy at 75%...

Ad for the pwe tapes we may never know, but seriously what we know about trump isn't it very probable.

I mean he hired a Obama impersonator so he could yell at him for hours, not much of a stretch to think he would have bookers per on a bed Obama and wife slept in...
 
And the Carter Page/FISA fiasco.
Agreed.
That would be an evidence #1 of Obama politicizing federal agencies and wielding them as political weapons to the point of defrauding the FISA court to do so.
Evidence #2 would be the active orchestrating of General Flynn's entrapment, via FBI's investigative and the Mueller investigation's prosecutorial malfeasance.
 
There is much in it that has not been verified, but nothing has been proven false.

Steele himself estimated the accuracy at 75%...

Ad for the pwe tapes we may never know, but seriously what we know about trump isn't it very probable.

I mean he hired a Obama impersonator so he could yell at him for hours, not much of a stretch to think he would have bookers per on a bed Obama and wife slept in...
So this is a document with an author who rates its accuracy at 75%, an IG found to be largely uncorroborated, the CIA called internet rumors, and whose own sources have disputed claims about what they said…and you call it a “factual report”?
 
The fact remains that the IG report said the words were false. IG Horowitz worked for Obama before Trump.

Why are you so hung up on the steele dossier? Oh because you hope no one questions your post. The IG report stated there was zero political bias and it was properly initiated, but please go one about the dossier.
 
So this is a document with an author who rates its accuracy at 75%, an IG found to be largely uncorroborated, the CIA called internet rumors, and whose own sources have disputed claims about what they said…and you call it a “factual report”?
Much of it has been confirmed, nothing has been disproved.

That is basically the definition of factual information...
 
Much of it has been confirmed, nothing has been disproved.

That is basically the definition of factual information...
I have 3 billion dollars in the bank, own six private jets, four yachts, and a house in every state in the US. Prove me wrong.
 
I have 3 billion dollars in the bank, own six private jets, four yachts, and a house in every state in the US. Prove me wrong.
There is not a US citizen who owns six personal private planes, so your wrong...
 
There is not a US citizen who owns six personal private planes, so your wrong...
You do see the point though, right? Obviously at this point you’re just stirring the pot so this is where we part ways. Probably best to keep this thread on the topic at hand.
 
You do see the point though, right? Obviously at this point you’re just stirring the pot so this is where we part ways. Probably best to keep this thread on the topic at hand.
Tip I've challenged many to discredit the Steele dossier.

Like you they go to colleen in Prague as it is the only thing that has truly been challenged.

Then it's all deflection, distraction, disinformation and then surrender..

Thanks for playing...
 
Tip I've challenged many to discredit the Steele dossier.

Like you they go to colleen in Prague as it is the only thing that has truly been challenged.

Then it's all deflection, distraction, disinformation and then surrender..

Thanks for playing...
Ok last thing, maybe (I can't resist). The dossier was used as an intelligence document. Intelligence is not presumed true unless proven false. That's not how this works. This was a big reason the FBI got their pee pee slapped by the FISA court. I can just picture it:

FISA judge: And you are stating that the information provided is correct?
FBI lawyer: Well, nobody has said it isn't correct, amirite???
FISA judge: Ahhh yes. Approved!
 
Ok last thing, maybe (I can't resist). The dossier was used as an intelligence document. Intelligence is not presumed true unless proven false. That's not how this works. This was a big reason the FBI got their pee pee slapped by the FISA court. I can just picture it:

FISA judge: And you are stating that the information provided is correct?
FBI lawyer: Well, nobody has said it isn't correct, amirite???
FISA judge: Ahhh yes. Approved!
It was a fraction of the evidence for the fisa warrant, and thanks to the "patriot act" it is far harder to not get a fisa warrant than it is to get one I believe it's a total of nine that have ever been turned down.

The dossier did not even need to be presented...
 
It was a fraction of the evidence for the fisa warrant, and thanks to the "patriot act" it is far harder to not get a fisa warrant than it is to get one I believe it's a total of nine that have ever been turned down.

The dossier did not even need to be presented...
If only 9 FISA warrants have been turned down by the FISA court, isn't the conclusion that the FISA court is failing in protecting the rights of citizens?
I mean given that the FISA court has been defrauded by the FBI at least once if not three times (including FISA warrant extensions).
 
Back
Top Bottom