• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Activists Brace for Failure at COP21

Lord of Planar said:
Why do you bother.

We all know he doesn't know of any bad instances caused by global warming.
Click to expand...

That's because the "Scientist" only talk about what will happen, many years from now, unless we we pay out the ass for their schemes to save the future. He cares about your great great great grandkids.
 
Renae said:
That's because the "Scientist" only talk about what will happen, many years from now, unless we we pay out the ass for their schemes to save the future. He cares about your great great great grandkids.
Click to expand...

I think he probably belongs in the CT section. Climate always has been, and ever shall be cyclical. We have a small impact, but I have seen good from the increased temperatures and CO2. not bad. the fact he won't give us a specific example of what harm GW has caused is real telling.

He doesn't care about the truth. Just the agenda.
 
Lord of Planar said:
I think he probably belongs in the CT section. Climate always has been, and ever shall be cyclical. We have a small impact, but I have seen good from the increased temperatures and CO2. not bad. the fact he won't give us a specific example of what harm GW has caused is real telling.

He doesn't care about the truth. Just the agenda.
Click to expand...

Im waiting on the el nino floods here, figure a 60% of bad times in SA
 
Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
Senenth time of asking; What negative effects of GW have happened so far? [7]
Click to expand...

Threegoofs said:
Answered. But you want to be spoonfed, don't you?
Click to expand...

No. You have not answered it you have avoided the question because somewhere inside you you know that there have been no negative effects of GW so far.

Otherwise you would be very keen to point tem out.

So again; what has happened so far that's bad? [8]
 
Lord of Planar said:
Why do you bother.

We all know he doesn't know of any bad instances caused by global warming.
Click to expand...

Yes. Obviously. But the opportunity to make sure that the rest of the world also understands this is just too good to miss.

Without the likes of 3NoFacts it would be much more difficult to get the message that there is nothing bad happening out.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Yes. Obviously. But the opportunity to make sure that the rest of the world also understands this is just too good to miss.

Without the likes of 3NoFacts it would be much more difficult to get the message that there is nothing bad happening out.
Click to expand...

Others who are more reasonable have seen it enough times now.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Yes but there are those who are regulars here and some who just pop in now and again.

Besides, it's just too much fun.
Click to expand...

OK...

I'll agree with the fun.

When I'm in the right mood, I like to point out things like ignorance, stupidity, living in a box, hypocrisy, etc.
 
Lord of Planar said:
OK...

I'll agree with the fun.

When I'm in the right mood, I like to point out things like ignorance, stupidity, living in a box, hypocrisy, etc.
Click to expand...

That's why I'm Tim the plumber. I am a plumber but I love it when some arragant fool tries to tell me that they know stuff that is plainly wrong. Easy victory.
 
Tim the plumber said:
That's why I'm Tim the plumber. I am a plumber but I love it when some arragant fool tries to tell me that they know stuff that is plainly wrong. Easy victory.
Click to expand...

It's not a victory when you celebrate ignorance as some kind of 'point' in a debate.

I told you where the info is, you are apparently too devoted to ignorance to look it up.
 
Threegoofs said:
It's not a victory when you celebrate ignorance as some kind of 'point' in a debate.

I told you where the info is, you are apparently too devoted to ignorance to look it up.
Click to expand...

What are the negative effects of GW so far?

Each time you fail to answer it shows that there are no such troubles. [9]
 
At least one warmist thinks the Paris terrorist attack was on behalf of Big Oil. You can't make this stuff up.

[h=3]But wait, what if it was a Big-Oil plot?[/h] Oliver Tickell in the Ecologist wonders if the aim of the Paris terrorists was to save oil profits instead of being a reaction to dry weather?
“Is it a coincidence that the terrorist outrage in Paris was committed weeks before [the UN’s] COP21, the biggest climate conference since 2009? Perhaps. But failure to reach a strong climate agreement now looks more probable. And that’s an outcome that would suit ISIS – which makes $500m a year from oil sales – together with other oil producers.”
Tickell asked “ISIS Inc defending its corporate interests?”
As Bishop Hill says “A real OMG moment here folks”.
For commenters, thanks to Australia’s 18C laws on racial vilification — even if you are not discussing a race, but a meme or a religion — you can’t cause offence. Please [SNIP-18C] yourself. Don’t do it for their sake, do it for mine. For your info, it appears to be accepted in Australia to say mean and offensive things about Daesh believers.
Weep for our freedom of speech when talking about anyone else.
Niall Ferguson has an excellent article in The Australian and London Sunday Times.
h/t climatedepot.com, David, Colin,
 
Climate News
[h=1]Memo to Paris: don’t base policy on overblown prediction[/h] Halfway to 2°C – halfway to hell on Earth or just a number? Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley The Met Office is at it again. Just in time for Paris, in a stunt co-ordinated with the unspeakable BBC, it issued a characteristically mendacious press release saying that global mean surface t
 
Some interesting notes on the funding of AGW believer organizations.


[h=1]Can of Worms (2) Tellus Mater[/h] Posted on 22 Nov 15 by Geoff Chambers • 2 Comments
Wherever you look in the strange world of Climate Campaign Funding, the same names keep popping up; philanthropic foundations set up by dead American billionaires; various offshoots of the United Nations and the European Commission; the Dutch National Lottery – and Tellus Mater. I’ve spent a morning idly googling around and this is what I …
 
Lord of Planar said:
Why do you bother.

We all know he doesn't know of any bad instances caused by global warming.
Click to expand...

More arable land, less starvation... that leads to overpopulation! :roll:
 
jmotivator said:
More arable land, less starvation... that leads to overpopulation! :roll:
Click to expand...

OMG....

So true.

Global warning helps the planet to have more people.

Damn. I have been so wrong. We need less productive land so the people will die off.

My mistake.
 
[h=2] Only 3% of US people think climate is most important issue[/h]
Has there ever been a greater disconnect between what the elected leaders are offering and what the public really wants?
Obama must know what these polls say, so when he tells us that “climate change is the greatest threat” we know he’s not doing it to win votes. If he is hoping to “lead” the people, his failure is dismal.
Is there any doubt left that The Climate Cause serves politicians and not the people?
…

The numbers have shifted since July when the survey was last done. “Terrorism was up from 11% to 24% thanks to Paris. The economy and jobs was down from 30% to 21%. Climate change was all of 5% then, dropped to 3% now (pretty much in the error margin).

SOURCE: Fox News Survey. 1,016 registered voters of a random national sample with a margin of error of plus or minus 3%.
 
[h=2] Climate Spectator bites the dust[/h]
Shucks. A few days before the giant UNFCCC starts in Paris, Climate Spectator has been closed. (Didn’t know it existed? It was a part of the Business Spectator). Maybe Big Renewables is not doing such a roaring big business?
You can see how active and non-stop the pro-green energy message was, thanks to Google caching of The Climate Spectator. That was yesterday. For some odd reason the headline link to it is already gone, obliviated already and fed through to the mother-publication by default. Typically, the more popular articles got 5 – 10 comments, the rest, zero. To get the flavor, see “Going off grid” — where Tristan Edis argues that all that solar energy you make will be wasted (and it will cost you a lot of money too). He seems to think that intermittent unreliable energy is “useful” to the Grid, and there’s no sense in the article that I can see of the waste of the Grid’s resources and energy in accommodating his surplus.
The collapse of the Climate Spectator is of course, framed by some as “Murdoch strikes again”. Presumably Murdoch acquired it in 2012 and has been waiting all this time to fulfil his evil plan…
The Climate Spectator was part of suite of news website that came with the acquisition of Australian Independent Business Media by News Corp in 2012….
It’s a conspiracy you know. Though the love media, like Fairfax, have also been cutting other journalists. Coincidence?
Editor, Tristan Edis let slip that he sometimes cursed the competition from The Conversation:
“The Conversation has also added a new insightful set of voices, even though I often cursed it for taking away several learned voices of friends and long-time colleagues I would have preferred to have been writing for Climate Spectator exclusively.
Yet again the government funded groups help drive out the free market competitor that provides the same service at no expense to the taxpayer.
It’s tough competing with the ABC, SBS, and The Conversation.
The Climate Spectator may be just another victim of Big-government.
h/t to Jim S.
 
[h=1]People of Earth, Your Attention Please[/h] Posted on 28 Nov 15 by Alex Cull • 3 Comments
On the eve of COP21 the UN has uploaded onto YouTube a brief speech by Ban Ki-moon exhorting people everywhere to “push your governments to deliver what we need in Paris”. The words and the tone are eerily familiar – indeed, replace “Paris” with “Copenhagen” and this is something that might almost have been copied … Continue reading →


[h=1][/h]
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=1]People of Earth, Your Attention Please[/h] Posted on 28 Nov 15 by Alex Cull • 3 Comments
On the eve of COP21 the UN has uploaded onto YouTube a brief speech by Ban Ki-moon exhorting people everywhere to “push your governments to deliver what we need in Paris”. The words and the tone are eerily familiar – indeed, replace “Paris” with “Copenhagen” and this is something that might almost have been copied … Continue reading →


[h=1][/h]
Click to expand...

Greetings, Jack. :2wave:

What does "reducing the consumption of sausages and bacon" have to do with climate change? I think they were panicky back then, and they haven't improved much since, that I can see! :sinking:
 
polgara said:
Greetings, Jack. :2wave:

What does "reducing the consumption of sausages and bacon" have to do with climate change? I think they were panicky back then, and they haven't improved since! :sinking:
Click to expand...

Greetings, Polgara.:2wave:

If you're a warmist then everything is about AGW.:mrgreen:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom