It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?
It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.
It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.
A police report on the death of Michael Brown is missing key information and violates Missouri open records laws, an ACLU attorney told Yahoo news on Friday.
But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?
:laughat: Duplicitous report? Ha, ha, ha!You don't have to assume anything.
All you have to do is take a look at the duplicitous report that the Ferguson police put out to see that there's a cover-up going on.
Eventually (At the trials maybe.) all of the facts will come out.
It is irrelevant what they can or can not figure out.Many journalists have attempted to figure out the timeline, but it is virtually impossible because of the lack of cooperation and available information from local agencies.
Reaslly? ilol :dohDid Wilson report the incident? We can't determine that for sure.
What false info? And what was redacted?Why did the police chief release false information regarding the robbery? Who knows, he later redacted it.
Wtf?Why is there no record of the event in the daily logs? Seems rather fishy to me.
Oh geez! :dohWhy have the protesters been harassed and arrested? Perhaps they're being unlawful, perhaps not.
Journalists are part of the problem in enforcing order. They do not get to act with impunity just because they are the press. They too must remain orderly and follow direction. But that has nothing to do with this at all.Why are so many journalists being harassed and their movements curtailed? Who knows.
No. :naughty Simply no.When the details of an event such as this are shrouded in secrecy, it all but ensures that assumptions of a coverup will be made.
:laughat: Duplicitous report? Ha, ha, ha!
It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.
And? You have nothing there.You don't have to assume anything, just look at the report that the cops put out.
Nobody can point to much.There is almost nothing there...
View attachment 67171832
And? You have nothing there.
Nor could you point to anything there.
A police report on the death of Michael Brown is missing key information and violates Missouri open records laws, an ACLU attorney told Yahoo news on Friday.
Read the article here: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael Brown's death violates law
Eventually all of the facts will come out because the ACLU will insist on that.
But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?
Nobody can point to much.There is almost nothing there...
View attachment 67171832
They know there was a murder so they aren't saying anything.
If there was evidence for justification they would have put that in the report.How do you know there was a murder with no evidence of one.
It is possible they have evidence of murder but equally likely they have evidence proving that the shooting was justified.
Where do you get your insight? ESP?
Both pages even. St. Louis County Police Department report also. iLOLOf course there's nothing there, they censored it!
You have no evidence to back up your absurd claims.With nothing in the report, there is nothing they need to defend.
It is a stonewall defense that reeks of guilt.
Anything they say will point to murder ... so to protect the murderer ... they say nothing.
How do you know there was a murder with no evidence of one.
It is possible they have evidence of murder but equally likely they have evidence proving that the shooting was justified.
Where do you get your insight? ESP?
If there was evidence for justification they would have put that in the report.
It was a murder.
Both pages even. St. Louis County Police Department report also. iLOL
That's funny.
Exactly what the trolls of the ACLU deserve.
All the evidence points to a pissed off, out of control cop ready to exact a lethal vengeance on an un-armed black kid who disrespected him and caused him to bump his head on his own car door.You have no evidence to back up your absurd claims.
And they are absurd, considering most of all the other evidence points to his being justified.
Nothing is going to change that evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?